Artist Valery Rybakov

[Peter]

I ponravilos.Derevo bloom or not? If not, then the gaps between the branches a little darker in tone than nebo.Tak-nice, for the simple palitry.Nastroenie transmitted.

[Валерий Рыбаков]

Yes, it really is a flowering tree "

[Marta]

I was in all respects like the sketch. For only he who sees the original, will be able to judge - the impression is better than the picture, or worse.

 In my opinion, and in the latter "mastihinovom" creation appeared that something new was better. Perhaps starting to feel the space. And it is you have some kind of sucks. Something about this is . "I'm just in general, such a fiery colors are not to your liking. I do not know, maybe someone likes it. Note - a small sketch image in general looks very organic and "palette knife, falling apart. That is, not yet formally decided. Well, the plot - there is still something to think so?

[Валерий Рыбаков]

As an experiment ...

[Валерий Рыбаков]

Etude ..........

[NATA NOVA]

Rybakov, and business is already zarigestriroval?

[Peter]

Сообщение от NATA NOVA

Rybakov, and business is already zarigestriroval?

Yesterday was the opening of one vystavki.Vpolne decent artists, honest, someone better, someone net.Horoshee obschenie.Mnogo lovers of the beautiful and t . p.Razgovorilsya with a rather pozhilym.On pictures did not participate. The artist showed photos of his old rabot.Kommertsiya 100 protsentov.A because in iskussive understands, realizes that now that net.Stal remember what he wrote: it is under the Impressionists, while well-paid, it's Venice on the order, it erotika.Dengi, money ... In the end he said: "But nothing ventured this show, still no one will buy." I felt sorry for him.

[Валерий Рыбаков]

Peter, do you think that the last sketch written by me for commercial purposes - as well leave the flowers to the left and right as the pies?

[Peter]

Valery Rybakov, I just do not think so, especially since the flowers do not diverge as pies, a gallery owner said it to me (apart landscapes <!--~ ~-->) Just a message from the NATA NOVA gave me reason to think about this rasprstranennom type of artist (and most of them). The purpose of art of artist money, it narrows its scope and creative sposobnosti.Dlya bankers is on the contrary, I estesstvenno.A flowers. lyublyu.Vot itself is an example natyurmorta.Kommerchesky it or not? "I do not know, you can tell .

[Валерий Рыбаков]

Сообщение от Peter

Valery Rybakov, I just do not think so, especially since the flowers do not diverge as pies, a gallery owner said it to me (apart landscapes <!--~ a ~-->) Just a message from the NATA NOVA gave me reason to think about this rasprstranennom type of artist (and most of them). The purpose of art the artist is money, it narrows its vision and creativity sposobnosti.Dlya bankers is on the contrary, I estesstvenno.A flowers. myself very much . Here's an example natyurmorta.Kommerchesky it or not I do not know, you can tell a .<!--~ ~-->

I, Peter, still need to brush up on this issue (for the separation of art for commercial and noncommercial).
I would be happy if it's to comment on my recent flowers.
Thanks

Posted 2 hours 51 minutes

Сообщение от Valery Rybakov

Some improved left now

This picture is already in Germany on the wall of the buyer