Technique of oil painting and preservation of paintings

[NATA NOVA]

Сообщение от artcol

I'm just in the fact that I personally do oil painting only as a vintage voprinimayu. It all innovations, it seems to me unnecessary, and sometimes harmful.
__________________

Only canvases (gruntovynyh) traditional (vintage) orientation in the sale and then there's nothing! All vinyl-emulsin ...
If anyone knows, publish, pozhlst.!

So that's more inclined to acrylic ..
I now think acrylic base (binder for pigments) buy-like mix-so that logically turns smoothly sehat in acrylic ...

[Posav]

Сообщение от artcol

You'd think 90%of painters problem is not utilitarian! In the eternity hostage!

Yeah, something like this:

[Pavel]

Сообщение от Seriy

is an acrylic polymer binder instead of linseed oil. Pigment ink exactly the same as in oil. Plus, after drying, curing it is chemically unchanged - with nothing happening. And oil continues to live-polymerize, oxidize, decompose, exposed to microorganisms.
Previously, the term oil paints inferred mineral pigments. Now it is more synthetic, so that from the "traditional" an oil painting remained only a shell.
The same with linen canvas-absorbs moisture, highlights, destroys bacteria, decompose, oxidize. A PVC all the drum.

Plastic aging.

[Marta]

Сообщение от Posav

In the figure you can re-photograph the technique of painting, that we must mount and otprintit on fabric.
This is suitable for non-artists.

Very interesting, when, say, a composition is created on the computer, then the image is printed on canvas, and then re-or pre-treated with it as - normal for modern art? The main thing - the idea, and attached to the skill and hands - not very much and it is important or what? In my opinion, make this process easier as dirt, had the money for photography and printing, but is awkward to call it art ... or those moral and ethical "brake" long day the day before yesterday?

[Posav]

Сообщение от Marta

then the image is printed on canvas, and then re-or pre-treated with it as - normal for modern art? The main thing - the idea, and attached to the skill and hands - not very much and it is important or what? In my opinion, make this process easier as dirt, but it is awkward to call it art ... or those moral and ethical "brake" long day the day before yesterday?

It is necessary then it would indicate that the used "photographic images, computer processing, coloring, ie work in mixed technique, or a collage.

[Marta]

That is, you feel quite equal the work of modern art?

[Posav]

Сообщение от Marta

That is, you feel quite equal the work of modern art?

Frankly indicates the manufacturing techniques and is not issued for the painting by hand, it may well be a new kind of art.
An example of such a creature appeared fotoshopnaya painting, which can take any student to manage the program and passing the training pattern, plastic anatomy and TAs. the artistic establishment.

[Marta]

Yes. Even if the work is done much more complicated, in the final analysis, it will still run out.
Once so far failed to form a relationship to this, but we would like.

[Posav]

Here's an example of this artist working with photoshop:
http://liveinternet.ru/community/802038/post48475517/
Website
budaev.ru

[NATA NOVA]

He (Buda) and then overwrites them with oil or directly on the canvas "zhikliruet" and all?