Mark Rothko

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от vg_edger; 2298131"

I thought and still think that Malevich - divorce and lohotronschiki , and his works - garbage . But at the same time in the world there are many people who can get aesthetic pleasure from the debris, it is their right , let get .

I thought and still think the stock market experts , that b. working with financial assets people even just in everyday terms clever and careful in terms, but reading your ignorant nonsense , I have to admit that
a) whether or not all there is so smart ;
b) or just lying and " of professional stock market ", and of " work with financial assets ".
Periodically here on the forum wander these types , I think they should be left alone with their moronic cliches from " Crocodile" 60s .
I would still said nothing, but somehow it is necessary to stand up for artists, but then so are running too inadequate to the complex here Herostratus wishing though the Internet, " stand " and great.

[vg_edger]

Сообщение от zarajara

I-art.

This does not mean anything.
In any field of endeavor of all working people in her real professional no more than 5%.
For art, I think the proportion is preserved.
Well, if you are among the 5%.

[zarajara]

Сообщение от vg_edger

This may not mean anything . In any field of endeavor of all working people in her real professional no more than 5 %. For art , I think the proportion is preserved. Well, if you are among the 5 %.

You seem to really understand what you are saying. I'm not interested in your opinion about his competence.
Previous my post was , I think, fairly clear allusion to the fact that:

1. Not all critics express admiration for the work of the above (in this case) artists.
2. improper mold labels on everything that you personally do not like
3. If you really one of the cult ( as they say ) the authors do not like it so much that you have decided to speak out on a specialized forum , it should at least be justified.

[uriart]

vg_edger, largely agree with you!
About Malevich, so it also was able to put together beside her students and followers. A sort of a small mass psychosis.
The timing was such that many were looking for myself and could not put it in his work , and that's joined to it.
And then off we go !
Black square !
Genius!
And everything else on the letter " G" is on his own add.

But, as Malevich was a man alive and still and drew something out there.
That is not to talk about it just could not.
Once it is exposed, then the reviews were for his work.

That's interesting what people wrote criticism and criticism in the press of the time.
Cyril, you know about it.
Share the information .

[vg_edger]

Сообщение от zarajara

I think you do not really understand what you are saying. I'm not interested in your opinion about his competence.
Previous my post was , I think, fairly clear allusion to the fact that:

1. Not all critics express admiration for the work of the above (in this case) artists.
2. improper mold labels on everything that you personally do not like
3. If you really one of the cult ( as they say ) the authors do not like it so much that you have decided to speak out on a specialized forum , it should at least be justified.

I sculpt labels , I just express their own opinion. I do not like , simply because I think that there's just nothing like it , works to do, there is only a mockery of common sense. What you as an art like or do not like Rothko works ?

[Игорь Гурьев]

Comrade Adger , you try to find the artistic quality in modernism , and this stuff is where the search is not necessary.

Modernism reversed the concept of artistic quality , and replaced him with a gesture (including antihudozhestvennym ) etc.

Modernism wanted including the fact that they resented such well-meaning citizens like you.
" Epatirovanie bourgeois " is called.

In doabstraktnom vanguard artistic quality was still , then - gone.

But as long as there are fans and opponents of modernism , modernism also exist.

[uriart]

zarajara, I am sure !
What works like Malevich , primarily for the fact that there are a lot of money !
And it works on so many !
The same situation with the works of Rothko and necrophiliac Hirst.
Just Malevich was the first man unwound this shnyagu with pseudo .
And then went to the followers who thought , "But what have I done ? But I am able to fool more people " , and began to talk about the special vision , etc.
Invented there any performances and such nonsense .
And as you come to a normal art gallery, I saw myself more than once.
People who stood beside the classics , considering. A room where exposed to art just like a quick pass. And if they linger near the works, so hear the questions , " How can this be ? This fabulous money 's worth !"

[Konstantin]

Сообщение от uriart; 2298451"

people who stood near the classics , considering. A room where exposed to art just like a quick pass .

Come on you .... Quite the contrary . Though of course the main talent of the artist, standing in front of landscapes Levitan will , before landscape artisans, in a good way - no.

[vg_edger]

Сообщение от Igor Guryev

But while there are fans of modernism, modernism, too, there will be.

I think that basically it is not fans, and partners (such as Leni Golubkova) who hope vparit this garbage even more to the point, until people figure out that "the emperor has no clothes."

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от uriart

Regarding Malevich, so it also was able to put together beside her students and followers.

He did not " together a ", and taught:

1924-26 biennium - the Leningrad State Institute of Artistic Culture (Institute of Artistic Culture), he dtrektor ESO;

1928-30 years at the Kiev Art Institute.