What distinguishes the true artist from not present?

[Mihail]

Сообщение от AlexanderG

No dlia etogo neobhodimo dogovorit'sia o fundamental'nyh opredeleniiah.
Bez etogo - vriadli poluchitsia.

Art is too subjective, it can not be squeezed into the framework of the basic sciences. Trust your own taste, if you feel that the taste leads are geared to the taste of their authority. At one time, in the walls of the Academy of Arts in traversing discussed the work of the student. Famous Evsei Moiseenko says 5, and the head. Department of Painting Mylnikov says 2, it came almost to blows ... so that in art there are no exact criteria, do not look for them, waste of time ....

[AlexanderG]

Сообщение от Mihail

in art there are no exact criteria, do not look for them, an empty thing ....

 Sovershenno verno. No kogda my govorim ob investitsiiah, fundamental'nye soglasheniia dolzny byt 'dostignuty.
No poskol'ku ih ne suschestvuet, to i ob investitsiiah govorit 'ne prihoditsia.

[AlexanderG]

Сообщение от Seriy

AlexanderG in
And you ever seen a thread devaluation perfume? It is prohibited by the manufacturer. T e Chanel No. 5 can not be discounted and sold cheaper prices, conceived by the manufacturer.
Maybe in Australia different?

Da, inache. Ne polenilsia posmotrel. Toze hochu byt 'ekspertom po parfiumerii

http://www.getprice.com.au/Chanel-No...ns-Perfume.htm

Po ssylke:

V odnom magazine tsena $ 243, a v drugom $ 215.50.

Eto daze ne kopaia.

Added after 2 minutes
http://hisnherperfumes.com.au/public....aspx?pid=2526


Nashiol eschio odin, tsena $ 179.

[NATA NOVA]

Сообщение от Mihail

Art is too subjective, it can not be squeezed into the framework of the basic sciences.

Can, can! (And more like stuffing!)

[Buscador]

Сообщение от Mihail

Art is too subjective, it can not be squeezed into the framework of the basic sciences.

And how you view this:
"They say: Art is not science, not mathematics, it is art, feelings, and that art can not explain anything - look and enjoy. In my opinion, it is not. Art explained and had very logical about it and you need to know it matematichno. In this case, it can be and explain. You can just prove why the picture is good and why bad " (NP Crimea)

[Pavel]

This artist is different talent.
This art-those that can distinguish the present.

[Buscador]

Сообщение от Pavel

This artist is different talent.
This art-those that can distinguish the present.

Lived been an artist and art ... One thought that he is talented, the other saw and admired this talent. They respected each other. They were real. Came third, which also became their respect. And they did. So they were respectable people: a true artist, true art and this third ... More about them no one knew !
".. the highest court for an artist has always been and will be the impression, which is bringing thousands of spectators from the picture." (I. Kramskoy)

[fross]

The famous aphorism of unknown author:

Talent hits a target, in which nothing can get. Genius hits a target that nobody sees.

[Причал]

Сообщение от fross

famous aphorism unknown author:

Very handy aphorism.

[Pavel]

Сообщение от fross

famous aphorism unknown author:

So what's the difference talent-genius? The genius of this is talent.