Auction "Epoch", Kiev

[snig]

not a lot of interesting and lots of boring, and too young talents - not talent

[ottenki_serogo]

snig, "but too young talents - not talent" whom are you?

[Артём]

Agree Snig, skushnyatina, in flowering landscape is good, nothing else touches.: Cool:

[Altim]

Auction Results:
Sold lot 53 of 148 (36%). Total revenue - 755 800 U.S. dollars.
Top Lot - № 8, a sculpture of Alexander Archipenko, 1914, went for 165 tons at the start 150.
The majority of sales - to start with a small (1-2 steps) growth.
Sold items: 2, 6, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 20, 21, 22, 23, 26, 27, 29, 33, 35, 40, 44, 45, 47, 49, 52, 55, 59 , 60, 63, 66, 69, 70, 71, 80, 81, 85, 88, 91, 93, 94, 95, 98, 104, 106, 108, 109, 115, 116, 117, 118, 126, 131 , 133, 139, 142, 144, 146, 147, 148.

[color="# 666686"]Posted 3 hours 3 minutes[/color]

Сообщение от Tana

Понравилась Tsvetkova, Lot 74

For this Tsvetkova like 12 thousand. Oops :-)

[sergej74]

Dear Altlim and prices could write lots 106/108/109/133/158 such as Lot 111 ZHM not want to give an opinion that work: cool: I was offered for $ 2000 two years ago

[Altim]

Сообщение от sergej74

Dear Altlim and prices could write lots 106/108/109/133/158 such as Lot 111 ZHM not want to give an opinion that work: cool: I was offered for $ 2000 two years ago

Everybody's gone to start. Deign:
106 - 8000
108 - 1500
109 - 2000
133 - 800
158 - a lot do not, there are only 148. 148 th went to 10000.
Lot 111 - is A. Kostecki, he zakarpatets. You probably had a lot in view 110. He did not particularly like this Kontratovicha.

[Tana]

Altim, thank you so much for the review, it is surprising that Lomykin sold Lot 115, somehow I can not say 100%that it was he, some inner sense ... not sold Malyshev, Spring (! ) and Glushchenko (in any form), perhaps the price of spring and Glushchenko were "extremely high ".... well Aivazovsky, is probably" Ukrainian "weakness (och.somnevayus that this is the most Aivazovsky) ...

[sergej74]

Dear Altlim I wildly izvenyayus I mixed up with the last auction: rolleyes:

[SAH]

Сообщение от Tana

.... Aivazovsky Well, it's probably" Ukrainian "weakness (och.somnevayus that this is the most Aivazovsky) ...

The catalog says Ive circle. will appear in Ukraine symbol (the circle of the artist) think that this korektno. and the price at which it sold 55 tons thus justified

[Altim]

Сообщение от Tana

Altim, thank you so much for the review, it is surprising that Lomykin sold Lot 115, somehow I can not say 100%that it was he, some inner sense ... not sold Malyshev, Spring (!) and Glushchenko (in any form), perhaps the price of spring and Glushchenko were "extremely high ".... well Aivazovsky, is probably" Ukrainian "weakness (och.somnevayus that this is the most Aivazovsky )...

Please :-)
115 th lot - dubious, in my personal opinion. I do these rough chopped pastels get around the tenth expensive Lomykinym from them "does not smell."
"Workshop" or "circle" Aivazovsky - it's just no comment, I do not understand how this can be put and buy a lot of money. Who is this attribution in general can do little if anyone copies of Aivazovsky's "spank" in the time and later?
Malyshev was nice and cheap: the 75 th lot - 3 tons, 76 th - 3 tons, but did not find an amateur, but I like his stuff more vivid in color.
Spring, 84 th lot - 12 tons lift that an accurate medium for this artist's bust, I think. So he soon Zakharova "eclipse" the price.
Glushchenko was inadequate road: № 36, c /m, 35х48 - 15 tons, № 65, c /m, 34h50 - 25 tons, № 68, c /m, 34h49 - 25 tons, № 83 - x /m , 80x70, 1958 - 50 tons
Sketches for such money is hardly anyone who needs, and canvas 50-ies he has in general are bad, because are unremarkable realism.

But that's selling very respected by me, Alexander Philbert (70-th lot in life, this miniature is much nicer to live perfectly. Although there are better, of course). A trifle, but pleasant - a good artist is moving gradually to the masses.