Turzhansky it?

[Altim]

[Игорь Гурьев]

I also like very much.
I could really write exactly the same for another family member.
The more details (a branch of the sticks in the window), they differ.

It is not enough for mazisto Tourjansky?
Well, when the files were not up to mazistosti.

In general. I personally do not cause suspicion, at least, in my opinion, it is written better than Leonard Viktorovich.

[Altim]

Repeats large successful works - this is a very common food for most professional artists.
The degree of impasto - a question like that. There is a signature and a number of other items available for technical studies, these tests will remove half of the questions. If the signature on-wet, if a set of pigments and painting and other elements all right - style will discuss separately.
Good roads of all the technical questions should answer confidently and without alternative. If not - let the risk of someone else.

I consider it necessary to decipher all the inscriptions, etc. There are very interesting cases.

[Glasha]

I can not judge which one is the real Turzhansky, but the work is, in my opinion, do different hand.
At the museum - a slender track, as shown in - somehow not glued, porch generally deployed and waddle. Also - just opinion.

[Altim]

[QUOTE=\\

[Артём]

[QUOTE=\\

[Romario]

I wonder how you can judge the authenticity of the work on this overexposed flash photos.

[Glasha]

On the authenticity of anyone and does not judge on such a terrible picture, and compare the two works.

[Тютчев]

For those who are more or less familiar with the work Tourjansky the thought of repeating the work it must seem absurd. This is contrary to his creative method. We must understand how it worked. He made no preliminary drawing on canvas ... great work he did write spatula ... And how to explain this difference in size with such a meticulous repetition of all the details of composition? Get up and let a large canvas on a copy of the work written by a palette knife in one sitting? Yes, it is easier and more logical to write one more picture from the same place! In what sense? Why he wrote this work? What guided? Definitely - a copy of the work Tourjansky to set the signature of the author copied the work, and therefore FALSHAK! I do not understand just why it is not done in size? ... But perhaps none was originally intended to issue a copy of the author's repetition.

He worked always in the same breath and wrote a paper a few sessions, he tried to take it all from nature directly, doge large landscapes to four feet are written directly to the canvas. Another fresh landscape, painted a palette knife, brush crafted homes in the studio. Brought from the Urals to the Moscow apartment of the work finished off, but never copied, my father did with them repeats. It's very appreciated and kept the state that they were captured from real life. This made his paintings and sketches so far have kept their sound, force and freshness.

Honored Worker
 Culture of the RSFSR
I. L. Turzhansky

False works Tourjansky much! Be careful, gentlemen!

[Wladzislaw]

Сообщение от Guriev, Igor

there were thousands of such names, we must look at the book, and then if there is.

Thousands of thousands! And further - that the relationship with the artist and the owner, simply order, or friendly meeting ...