Kabakov as a brand

[Кирилл Сызранский]

[artcol]

[Кирилл Сызранский]

And this is about someone?

[artcol]

[Кирилл Сызранский]

[artcol]

[Posav]

[Pavel]

Сообщение от artcol

It's all the little things and details.

All the above is made up of parts.
Take any famous artist and you will find creativity, ie in different periods of life the artist created the work, which sladyvayutsya in a row and are artist's work. I know artists whose work is divided into the commercial side (for money) and for the creative arts. If we take the Hopper, the more likely it was for creativity and just before election and still in keeping with his creativity.
No artist does not use policy tvorchestve.Tut everything is built precisely on politics, even in speculation on politics of art as such, is not there. Here's more theatrical, calculate on Single-and it becomes ridiculous as it passes through this point. Theatricality visible and Kandinsky prize and many installers so-called modern art. The problem puzzling the viewer, to provoke, etc. The purpose of this art in the heightened expression, therefore it is not nice to look at the work of our sovremenniskusstvennikov, the more that you meet in the work of our entire phrases looted, but without understanding, and therefore if there is one piece work here all blurred, but democratic politics. In my opinion is simply ridiculous, you just have to compare.
From the same opera oevreivanie many artists. Purely commercial reception, can welcome undemanding taste and incompetence of the buyer.

[artcol]

Сообщение от Pavel

All the above is made up of parts.
Take any famous artist and you will find creativity, ie in different periods of life the artist created the work, which sladyvayutsya in a row and make creative artist. I know artists whose work is divided into the commercial side (for money) and for the creative arts. If we take the Hopper, the more likely it was for creativity and just before election and still in keeping with his creativity.
No artist does not use policy tvorchestve.Tut all built exactly on the policy, even speculating on politics of art as such is not there. Here's more theatrical, calculate on Single-and it becomes ridiculous as it passes through this point. Theatricality is visible in Kandinsky prize in many installers so-called modern art. The problem puzzling the viewer, to provoke, etc. The purpose of this art in the heightened expressiveness, why it is so nice to look at our work does not sovremenniskusstvennikov, the more that you meet in the work of our entire phrases looted, but without understanding, and therefore if there is one piece work here all blurred, but democratic politics. And in my opinion is just ridiculous enough just to compare.
From the same opera oevreivanie many artists. Purely commercial reception, can welcome undemanding taste and incompetence of the buyer.

Anything can happen, including and what you write can take place - but their views on creativity Kabakov I said.

[Pavel]

I'm really against it if you like, but when love is good to know pochemu.Mne would have been interesting.