Boris Zemenkov (?), "Portrait of Anna Radlova" (?)

[fabosch]

Indeed, it pulls on real images.

[redbor]

And that leads to the conclusion the author Zimenkova?

[fabosch]

As you noticed with Zemenkovym me nothing in common, and moreover, that the owner of a picture thought his work Zemenkova. This for me, sostvenno there is no evidence, and indeed rebuttal. And all prior arts Zemenkova for me Terra incognita. And what about the version with Nicholas Ernestovich is active dissent. He still pupil D. Kardovsky and Lanceray at the Academy. Yes, and made samples of his early works did not tend to think that he might like this "rollicking" Futuro. I'm not saying even the works of the 1920's. Nothing to do with this pattern. But this is the work of 1913, 1920, 1916 and again 1920. That is, early Radlov - then and Anna was the age of the portrait.
If I understand correctly, A. Radlov was the wife of his brother NE - Sergei Ernestovich? So paint it of course it could. But otherwise ...

[Кирилл Сызранский]

[fabosch]

Thank you, Cyril, frankly, has never faced a rollicking Radlov

[redbor]

IMHO.