Petr Konchalovsky Foundation - examination of works

[Евгений]

ACG, as that issue went to the other side. "Art Consulting, a normal company, everyone there are individual errors. In the Tretyakov found about 200 of erroneous assessments (and only in recent years), and all with technology, laboratory .. something to discuss? And so everything is clear as day .. ..

[fross]

qwerty
Your arguments seem more convincing. I will tell something more about good opportunities. I Yavlensky very much.
ACG
Your managerial pressure with which you propagandiruete services your company is able to convince to the contrary and even cheerleaders totally neutral and had even previously known positive opinion of man.
Absolutely infallible conclusions in any field of knowledge can not be. The more technically reliable methods (just where something I understand). Why do they promise to aggressively?

[Евгений]

Foundation for the preservation of cultural heritage of the artist Pyotr Konchalovsky
About us
Directory works
Biography
Periods of creativity
1880-1906
"Early Years"
1907-1910
"Impressionism"
1910-1916
Knave of Diamonds "
1917-1922
1920
1930
1940-1950
Pyotr Konchalovsky
of artistic
creativity
Bibliography
Examination and attribution
Principles and Methods
Procedure
Fakes
Partners
News
New link http://www.pkonchalovsky.com/a_found.html

[тата]

ACG,
As for mistakes, then you probably know that liability insurance experts - our principle.

All this is wonderful. Give examples of insurance payments. Was there even one? If they were not, then it must mean that you never made a mistake. And I know exactly what you working with various experts from the State Tretyakov Gallery and Grabar. Explain this discrepancy, TG, and Grabar mistakes often do not recognize the original works, confirm Mashkov, who have knowledgeable people (to which I myself and counted) cause only a surprise but you have those same experts are not wrong.

[олег назаров]

The fact that there is such a fund - I think great!

[Евгений]