What are the critics?

[Игорь Гурьев]

Сообщение от Peter

There have been critics who say a curse Cezanne, then there were others who said that Cezanne fellow, he opened a new look at the painting.

Excellent.
This is a critical process alive.

Which one is more aware of the revelation of God?

Any art is a form of revelation of God, including the creation of the critic.
If the critic is not a woodpecker, it does not matter how he felt about Cezanne: positively or negatively.
His opinion is always interesting.

Here is an opinion, criticism of fog, in order to better express those or other group interests, depending on the conjuncture ."

This also happens, but I am not interested in such criticism.

Here, for example, milk, Jr., beautifully written in the best Russian journal of all time "Results".

[Vladimir]

Сообщение от Guriev, Igor

Milk Jr. wrote beautifully

Milk and listen very interesting, he is a brilliant storyteller and clearly highlight key points, although quick to slaughter.

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от Guriev, Igor

art historian studies the history of art, and the critic says and informs him about contemporary art.

This is where you learn about this?
_________________

Do you thanks-666.

[Peter]

Сообщение от Guriev, Igor

What could be simpler?

The task of the critic - to give information about the artist, as well as express in words how he perceives the art.

True, but expressing his views on the work of a critic of the artist becomes his tolkovatelem.Etakim intermediary between artist and audience massoy.Lyudi beginning to see the artist (his paintings)
through the prism of criticism, which may not always be objective.

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от Peter

People are beginning to see the artist (his paintings)
through the prism of criticism, which may not always be objective.

One might think that "people" read the critics.

Added after 2 minutes

Сообщение от Peter

What a mediator between the artist and the spectator mass.

Where is that "The mass of spectators?

[Peter]

Well written the same article, published biographies, research tvorchestva.Odnogo my friend "investigated." I was told that his work comes from Pirosmani, and he himself always fancied impressionist .

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от Peter

Well written the same article, published biographies, studies of creativity.

I suspect that yes, all this is written ...
But "whether it be"? How is this a "viewing masses?

[Art-ort]

Now all the critics and criticism is essentially an art dealer, but before they performed the ideological task of the party in engaging 'the people' to 'true art. "That's all .

[Pavel]

Сообщение от Peter

As an artist and a man who love art, I have often wondered what the critics want? "What they show in their works that are not visible to the eye, what can not be understood looking directly at the work of art? How their views contribute to the creativity of the artist, while others put a cross? "This is a subjective opinion or attempt an objective analysis of creativity?" I would like to hear the views of critics and art historians.

It seems to me that the task of critics to be able to analyze the processes occurring in a specific field of art and based on extensive knowledge of the work of many painters and artists for generations to conclude that the creation of a certain artist or group of artists. study of creative work of artists from different countries and time allows opreldelit degree of originality and lyrics. giftedness certain artist painter. Everything is understood in comparison, but to compare have to be very much to know and keep in mind.
Unfortunately our criticism and art history mired in commerce. and thus lost their outlook and can not compare. Many of knowledge are limited to superficial knowledge of the national art or narrowly professional knowledge given period. The overall disease-complementarity for the money, kills criticism.

[Peter]

Pavel, agrees with almost all your provisions, except that the "originality so gifted." It's more "modern" approach to the artist.

Added after 5 minutes

Сообщение от Pavel

Overall disease-complementarity for the money, kills criticism.

is interested in unbiased kritik.On can make an artist think, but "in a direction I go, whether in my work" vkusovschiny " and not to change it myself for the sake of fame and money. "Honest criticism is also rare.