"Mark Rothko: the unknown world", an exhibition in the "Garage"

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от Nara

We have the sea and there's no ....

Aivazovsky lived in RI, part of which was, and Armenia.

Added after 49 seconds

Сообщение от Eugene

Who is he Russian??

Yes, a Russian painter of Armenian origin.

[spigo]

Сообщение от Nara

And Rothko вобщем something no Russian artist, in my opinion.

About me, he said in Russian: "I-man"

[Евгений]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzranskiy

Yes, a Russian painter of Armenian origin.

Possible and so ..

[Nara]

Сообщение от spigo

About himself, he said in Russian: "I-man"

Probably these were the only words in Russian, which he remembered ...
A Jewish man - is from the soul!

Question Admin'u - and why I smileys do not work?
<!--~ ~--><!--~ 6 7 8 ~--><!--~ ~--><!--~ a ~-->
A: As it does not work? They work!

[Сима]

I want to return to the topic. Yesterday visited. Very impressive! Painting as it is, you might say. In its original form.
The light is really dull for dark visuals (it can be called "but, nevertheless, not a picture too!) But one of the black and purple also not let go. Second - steam (?) Left indifferent. Perhaps a different balance of emission and absorption, with subtle nuances, because composition, in fact, identical. Purple perceived as purple - a sacred color. A bright mural (?), I think, in the dark to emit energy. Interestingly, it shows the spectral analysis?
But like you, Vladimir able to feel the effect is 40 cm high with me, closer than 1 pm - squeaking scream. Entered into polemics with the guard about the distance - the artist himself, I say, ordered with a 40 cm watch - politely apologized, but alas, did not become disabled. But from 1 am also vibrates. (Maybe this is my subjective and cardiovascular effects? - I thought. But then realized that "swayed" by no means all. And psychedelic music is also valid.)

[Vladimir]

Сообщение от Sima

But how do you, Vladimir, were able to feel the effect is 40 cm high with me, closer than 1 pm - squeaking scream.

Aaa ... squeaker put the visitors drive away? That's right, nothing to hang around all kinds of viewers and fulfill the wishes of Rothko "I was at a media preview the day before - security pishchalki were not included, but all the walls protecting the table and made a step in readiness to repel an attack spectators. So reporters are lucky - they could see up to 40 cm.

Well though the protective glass is not closed. As the exhibition Krasnopevtsev have Markina some of its hardboard under glass sparkled (I think Semenihinskie, but do not remember exactly), so that the audience is not attacked or bitten.

[Черномашенцев Владимир]

I myself saw Rothko, but his work did not approve of - so I could write 20-30-40 years ago. And now they have faded bright stars, shining to us from abroad. Prekartsnoe Delek was simple, commercial and not interesting. And sometimes even unpleasant smell.

Today, alas, such is not to say. But, to paraphrase the well-known proposal, I would venture to enter into a polemic with the lovers of the great upholsterer. I myself Rothko first time I saw a year ago at the American exhibition in the Tretyakov Gallery on the Crimean shaft, but work did not approve. Here and now.

Rothko saw it originally divided into two polar camps:
1) Some people in ecstasy
2) Others say - wallpaper.

I belong to the latter. It is noticed that delighted with Rothko's mostly women. Together with me on the show had a friend with a girlfriend. Friend liked what we were in a deep cultural shock. I did not just settle it with their views and attacks, simply asked: "And what was it like?" And the answer we heard: "Very nice, warm colors, very home-like . I feel like in a fabric shop ".

Then we laughed for a long time. The same wallpaper, but the side view.

Note that the girlfriend - a woman trained. Turner, for example, is well understood.

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от Chernomashentsev Vladimir

I note that the girlfriend - a woman trained. Turner, for example, is well understood.

Good phrase.
I remember the Soviet times and the phrase there: "He was reading Faulkner's".
Remember, Igor Guriev?

[Маруся]

Сообщение от Chernomashentsev Vladimir

I myself have not seen Rothko, but his work does not approve of - so I could write 20-30-40 years ago.

But why are the same so far to go, another year had passed, as the same thing at the forum heard from you. Or do you forget? All forum persuade you first go to look, and then have to express their love - do not like.

Now it happened:

Сообщение от Chernomashentsev Vladimir

I myself Rothko first time saw a year ago at the American exhibition in the Tretyakov Gallery on the Crimean shaft, but work did not approve.

And yet:
Will look like this esthete, if his "prepared by the familiar" hint that Rodchenko's more like a Malevich than wallpaper ...

[sur]

My friend was on the show and returned winged,
 bursting with energy and a desire to urgently do something great. "Become an artist

  My aesthetic tastes are not sufficiently developed in order to admire works of Rothko, so I do not regard this exhibition to the activities required to visit .


  I think this show should definitely visit specialists in branding. And the phenomenon of prices Rothko art should be subject to detailed analysis and study.