Should I participate in these activities?

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от Pavel

This gallery owners and art historians should learn.

There are a lot of gallery owners and art historians, whose orbit of interest now living (live, forgive me) artists are not included.

Сообщение от Pavel

They want to live nicely, let them live without art.

Live, live, and bread chewing.
For them, do not worry ...

[Pavel]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzransky

There are a lot of gallery owners and art historians, whose orbit of interest now living (live, forgive me) artists are not included.

Live, live, and bread chewing.
For them, do not worry ...

about this, and it then must be called differently.

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от Pavel

then must be called differently.

But how you want to call yourself ...
I'm a genius Igor Severyanin ... (c)

[Seriy]

and free participation in the exhibition really happen?

[Причал]

Сообщение от Seriy

and free participation in the exhibition really is?

Not understand the question.
We have a collective always free for artists. Whose work has taken - it's a gallery owner. Sometimes thrown off to the banquet, but it's true - for 200 rubles.

If you carry a collective in Moscow and remove the "wall" or a pavilion or something like that - are thrown off and sent one or two people from the community.

[LCR]

Сообщение от Seriy

and free participation in the exhibition really is?

Of course, it happens all the prestigious exhibition - Free. Here is an example of "Pop Art" and "Sots Art" in the State Tretyakov Gallery, "Russian Collage," "Water in the picture," The Soviet Venus "in the SRM," Russian lettrism "in the CHA - the list goes on. Good picture, too, always make the exhibition free of charge ( "Guests", "Proun", "The Ark", "Fine arts" - these are the first that came to my head).

When the artist to do a solo exhibition at the Museum (TG, RM, GMII), you should find the money to pay the costs (installation /dismantle, lighting, etc.), but the exhibition itself is free, in the sense that the museum with her not receive a penny. Usually they are asked to donate work

The fact that the West is the case, just say, probably does not make sense - and so clear.

From personal experience - for all his life Roginskii never paid for the exhibition.

[Veronic]

LCR, Oh Liana, you say such things wonderful. But we somehow often confronted with the fact that the free and the best rooms - only for members of the Union of Artists. And if someone goes, so go entire fights for the right to exhibit. A free room more similar to a library or those where no one walks.
In the museum, though exposed for free, in Hungary (Museum Festetich), the museum is good, room excellent, place known. There was personalka .... And if the exhibition teams, so always ask money and considerable.

[Pavel]

I can participate, but only if I am invited.

[LCR]

As regards collective exhibitions will not say anything, everyone must decide for themselves.
But if the gallery suggests that it paid for the exhibition, in my opinion, to make this meaningless exhibition: gallery operates just like to rent room, all the talk about "clients", "criticism" and "advertising" - in favor of the poor. They have already received their money and nothing, absolutely nothing to do will not.

I know relatively good galleries that come out occasionally to hold such exhibitions fee (what to do, time was heavy!). So, they are always arranged so that everyone knew that the artist - not one of their clips, so that even more or less prestigious name of the gallery in such a case, nothing brings.
I'm talking about the West.

[L-ana64110]

Any exhibition for artist and rewarding experience, even sad, too, experience. question as you pull the money, without starving swoon? And necessarily required to first show the contract carefully examined now by absorbing the dictates of galleries, curators, artistic council who own the best-paid prestigious stages in the exhibition, the only way to meet new and interesting works of art! I am happy to go it on such an exhibition!