Henry Campendonk (1889-1957)

[Тамара]

Сообщение от LCR

A? You think a plausible explanation?

Excellent explanation! Thanks, Liana! I have so much of these explanations iskustvovedcheskih've been listening to a hundred times ears faded. And here shortly and once in the root.
There is much to learn ...

[Сима]

Сообщение от LCR

or the Cubists with their typical rather dull gray-brown color.

That's strange, a different perception - I always Cubist flavor seemed very exquisite - a pearl. And Russian sezannisty not everything's so awful - Falk, for example.

[Seriy]

Seema, as well as you think, where the egg and the chicken where the Blue Horseman? why the same palette?

[LCR]

Сообщение от Sim

That's strange, a different perception - I always Cubist flavor seemed very exquisite - a pearl. And Russian sezannisty not everything's so awful - Falk, for example.

Yes I Russian sezannistov not hulyu. "Óìîðà" - is not curse, just a palette in all of them at the beginning was the same, but some people have not changed. This applies to foreign first Cubists - not for nothing that the first period of Cubism called sezannovskim.

Of course, Falk good artist, from bubnovovaletchikov (so to speak 40 years ago one of our fellow student-iskusstvovedma, I really like) I'm still very fond of Shevchenko.

As analytical Cubist, no, it's not for me. Do not want to talk to not to offend anyone (but rather hinted about his attitude to this art against in the past), but it seems to me this dull monochrome, and yet due to the fact that Picasso had no sense of color. Here you are, now you know

[Сима]

Сообщение от Seriy

where the egg and the chicken where the Blue Horseman? why the same palette?

Seriy, Oh and a question! The answer really should be very long. Briefly: in each group had its own aesthetic doctrine (it is often philosophical). Kandinsky was anthroposophy. And the color of his anthroposophical - mystical, the spiritual vision. More "Blue Riders" (funny - and now "blue noses"), I think, belonged to the same unorthodox "religion". They (anthroposophists) did a whole system of symbolic colors. Is related to spiritual insights and knowledge.
In Kandinsky's book is "On the Spiritual in Art", there is an explanation. As for chicken and eggs - the case. when the hen is sitting in the egg. And the egg - a doctrine. T.e.nikto of them, I believe, did not affect their color (RGB) - it is their world view in light of anthroposophical doctrine. This does not negate the difference of temperaments and characters.

[Seriy]

LCR, Picasso, an artist with an absolute sense of color. I am only one of its job cuts eye, most likely - I do not understand, everything else from start to finish flawlessly and unattainable. He was brilliant at first, take a look the years 1900-1901. Then he became more restrained, played a more subtle combinations than in the forehead and on his forehead.
But even when in the late 30's and 40-s again began to write vivid colors, he has never been kakafonii. I am sensitive to color and to me all the authors quickly bored by their color decisions, but Picasso is a cure.
How to give perfumers smell the coffee, bring a sense of touch, as Picasso is well to glance for cleaning clogged color channels.

Added after 6 minutes
Seema, thanks, very interesting and really explains a lot ... What puzzles and discoveries!

[LCR]

Сообщение от Seriy

Picasso, an artist with an absolute sense of color

As you say

How can I answer that? I hold my opinion, quite skeptical about this artist. God has given him much mind, which he made up for lack of talent - in this, in my opinion, his main achievement.

Perhaps it makes sense to return to this conversation in 5 years (if I'm alive).

Added after 1 minutes 55 minutes
I placed the continuation of the coloring Riders in the plot on German expressionism, he was there the place.

[Seriy]

LCR, yes, Picasso's decision is not in the picture, but in some space near the picture-in speculative, in the historical. He was an ordinary artist until 1901, but with the opening of the blue period began to play more with the audience and himself in the game around and for the picture. As regards the assessment of purely pictorial talent, you're right, but the measure Picasso by the standards of conventional art is impossible. Yes, he did not reach to great skill, but a sense of proportion and a sense of painting him enough to never be wrong with any color, or with the composition.
And what will happen in 5 years?

[Meister]

By the way, someone very well have bought 2 February at Christies Campendonk, only 2,5 million wonderful year, super-duper size, oil. I think after two years he will be twice the cost.

[LCR]

Сообщение от Meister

By the way, someone very well have bought 2 February at Christies Campendonk, only 2,5 million wonderful year, super-duper size, oil. I think after two years he will be twice the cost.

Generally at poslednik tender and at Sotheby's, Christie's and have been quite a lot of German Expressionists, and the prices were serious (from memory, drawing Macke left in the 100000 pounds). In principle, we ought, of course, to analyze - here's an idea, Master

Because I absolutely agree with you, and not just about Campendonk, among them are authors with a very good investment potential (Nolde, in my opinion, the most promising - I'm talking solely about money.)