Makovsky, or not?

[AlexanderG]

Сообщение от yaks

'll show please!
Could this be the work of the portrait of Konstantin Makovsky?.
I would like to hear opinions from people well versed in art hudozhnika.Spasibo.

Vopros ob avtorstve ne reshion. Vy predpolozili, chto kartina mozet byt 'napisana tem-to i tem-to.

Added after 2 minutes

Сообщение от ANTIK

Signature 100%false.

Fal'shivaia podpis' na rabote neizvestnogo hudoznika?

Nikto ne opredelil avtorstvo raboty, a podpis' uze fal'shivaia!

Kstati, eto initsialy. V katalogah dolzno zvuchat ' "initialed" not "signed".

Added after 3 minutes

Сообщение от yaks

Yes, that signature is fake, I wrote myself in the beginning, here on speech rather than sign [for this reason it is in this section, rather than selling ....]. Message

Net, vy ne sdelali utverzdeniia, chto podpis' fal'shivaia.

Added after 4 minutes

Сообщение от Artem

Someone has a blue ribbon and the signature spoiled a good, a professional portrait.

Eto vashe mnenie, no ne fakt. Komu-to bantik nravitsia.

Added after 8 minutes
Imenno takoi neprofessional'nyi podhod, mozet imet 'razlichnye negativnye posledstviia. Pri otsenke i attributsii nuzen sistematicheskii podhod. Dannaia forma ne informativna i vredna.

Eto mozet vesti k dal'neishim sporam v stile "Saryan, 1911, expert opinion from the State Tretyakov Gallery.

[яков]

Сообщение от OlegTsi

yak, and make a place, please maximize the big picture of the letter K (from signature). Especially the central part. Thank you.

That's the maximum size of the big picture if you zoom in the letter - lost kachestvo.Spasibo.

[Артём]

Сообщение от AlexanderG

Komu-to bantik nravitsia.

Maybe like someone, I will not argue.
Imenno takoi neprofessional'nyi podhod, mozet imet 'razlichnye negativnye posledstviia. Pri otsenke i attributsii nuzen sistematicheskii podhod. Dannaia forma ne informativna i vredna.
Professional portrait, painted by Sfumato. Ie imposed in a manner Sfumato, colors as it were, dissolved in each other, not forming distinct boundaries and effecting haze. Increased tone may occur only at the touch of parts or objects.
In this portrait can be seen as mildly (tonally) fits pillow in the background and the colors are not disrupted by the method. The head girl is the center of the color and tonal composition, the eye almost in the center of the oval, but slightly shifted, which again points to the professional approach of the author. Just the eyes are the darkest spots on the picture and they are the basis of the dynamics and the illusion of life (the imaginary reality).
Bow - regardless of the method. Dramatically inscribed with the moment of fixing the image. In other words, like "nailed" to the head.
Perhaps pririsoval by the author himself after, at the request of the customer.

[redbor]

Сообщение от AlexanderG

Fal'shivaia podpis' na rabote neizvestnogo hudoznika?
Nikto ne opredelil avtorstvo raboty, a podpis' uze fal'shivaia!

Of course, we can not say that the signature is fake, not knowing whose signature is and who the author works.
 One can say that the work could theoretically belong to brush Makovsky,
and the signature - is clearly not the signature Makovsky.
 Yes, place a signature, a kind of awkward.

[AlexanderG]

Сообщение от Artem

Bow - regardless of the method. Dramatically inscribed with the moment of fixing the image. In other words, like "nailed" to the head.
Perhaps pririsoval by the author himself after, at the request of the customer.

Artiom, bantik eto tol'ko odin moment v otsenke dannoi kartiny. V otsenke dannoi kartiny net logicheskoi posledovatel'nosti iznachal'no. I imenno ob etom ia pisal.

[Артём]

Сообщение от AlexanderG

V otsenke dannoi kartiny net logicheskoi posledovatel'nosti iznachal'no.

Agree.
Can add that Makovsky enjoyed the usual three-stage method of painting, nor as not Sfumato. Although everything is relative, can one portrait and wrote, we need deeper examination. To cite one example, the portrait and signature Makovsky, compare.

[redbor]

Сообщение от Artem

need a deeper examination

Really not go without it!

[яков]

Сообщение от Artem

One could add that Makovsky enjoyed the usual three-stage method of painting, nor as not Sfumato.

I can of course be wrong, but look at the photos in post number 12. It seems that now, how it rubbed khim. means, over the years, it has a whitish hue - from the one and Sfumato napominaet.Ne could the author first insert a picture in a frame, and then build upon that either.

[Артём]

Сообщение от "yaks, 839,961

. I could not by first insert a picture in a frame, and then build upon that either.

That is exactly what did the wizard (very often). First, preparing the work podmalevyvali and registration done in the frame. No wonder.

[Romario]

I eskpert on painting, but working Makovsky seen. in his portraits are always so expressive features of persons, especially - eyes. I think that this work is weak and deflating for Makovsky.

Added after 1 minutes

Сообщение от Artem

I agree.
Can add that Makovsky enjoyed the usual three-stage method of painting, nor as not Sfumato. Although everything is relative, can one portrait and wrote, we need deeper examination. To cite one example, the portrait and signature Makovsky, compare.

I think it's portraits of different artists.