Photo: Leonid Tishkov Gallery Krokin

[LCR]

Wall hanging with the figures, in my opinion, charming (I go back to Tishkov).

A Golitsyn, the first time I see that I like very much, thank you, Galya.

Volodya, you want to say that the works of your favorite - and me - Volodya Yakovlev valuable intellectual component of their works?
I must say that this is the intellectual content was completely unclear to me, enlighten, be different!

[Meister]

agree with Gala, surely today to admire the beautiful I should definitely prosshuat hour lecture on his intellectual component? the art has to hang naturally, not artificially.

[iosif]

Tamila,
I explained about the explanation personally Krokin. He said that art does not require explanation - and not art at all

[Vladimir]

Сообщение от Tamila

art should be an explanation. not enough to hang a picture or put an object, need a story, a legend.

Yes, exactly. Age of pure beauty, do not need to be explained, has long thrown off the ship history. IMHO rightly so. Modern man important component of intellectual work.

[Glasha]

Сообщение от Vladimir

Age of pure beauty, do not need to be explained, has long thrown off the ship history. IMHO rightly so

I do not like categorization. And in this case do not understand.
Vladimir, "Shelves, shelving Mikhail Roginsky shown us Liana, or for example," Street "," Red Circle "Clara Golitsino - they do you need an explanation? Or dropped from the ship?

[dedulya37]

Сообщение от Vladimir

Yes, exactly. Age of pure beauty, do not need to be explained, has long thrown off the ship history. IMHO rightly so. Modern man important component of intellectual works

Complete nonsense!
I will not go into detail and repetition, but rather to compare our good old cartoons with coarse, vulgar, dirty, stupid, "intelligent" American "works".

[Сергеич]

Also not so "Wally" of the last cartoons - very good.

[Vladimir]

Сообщение от dedulya37

I will not go into detail and repetition, but rather to compare our good old cartoons with coarse, vulgar, dirty, stupid, "intelligent" American "works".

So true. Because life stage an advanced user of Soviet and American cartoons. Adoption, in my opinion, very tendentsiozno.Tochnee indiscriminately. Both cartoons are masterpieces and cultural nizkosortitsy. The only difference is that we have almost finished masterpieces with the fall of Soviet power. An example of a masterpiece - Disney's "The Lion King." Not a single reproach. Above script works a brilliant team, the technical implementation flawlessly, moral etichskaya side - perfect. This is about the "dirty and vulgar" American cinema. And they have found "chewing gum", rubbish. And we happen some "new adventures of parrot Keshi and new Well, wait a moment" - a rare wingless nightmare.

[color="# 666686"]Posted 11 minutes[/color]

Сообщение от LCR

Volodya, you want to say that the works of your favorite - and me - Volodya Yakovlev valuable intellectual component of their works?

Yes. Including. The intellectual component is present not only in the plot (it is an apple and an apple in Africa, but the person-crosses or cat with a bird of course self-explanatory), but in the approach, in Gunter creative research. I do not mean that intellectual picture - this is sure to puzzle.
By the way, Expressionism, but also the first time love is not all. Not once observed. It is a pleasure for the viewer prepared. Those who are brought up on the antique and Renaissance pure beauty not understand. Can not understand. Or proburchat that "eclectic".

[color="# 666686"]Posted by 21 minutes[/color]

Сообщение от Gala

"Shelves, shelving Mikhail Roginsky shown us Liana, or for example," Street "," Red Circle "Clara Golitsino - they do you need an explanation?

Dear Gala, for you, konenchno do not need, because you have your way in understanding have already done. But try to show their man in the street. You will hear a lot of unexpected questions Works great. Mug is good. But everything has its time.

[fross]

Vladimir Because life stage an advanced user of Soviet and American cartoons. Adoption, in my opinion, very tendentsiozno.Tochnee indiscriminately. Both cartoons are masterpieces and cultural nizkosortitsy. The only difference is that we have almost finished masterpieces with the fall of Soviet power.

Are even more advanced user cartoons (perhaps because of coincidences of life stages) and I can say that we have not finished masterpieces - "Mountain Gem" Studio Pilot is one example. But what! All possible techniques, a variety of artistic styles, and extremely subtle, ironic and careful reading of the tales of different peoples.

[Сергеич]

What exactly reminiscent of Malevich?

Well, for example, while another had Leporskii figures.