Resale Royalty

[Маруся]

Сообщение от LCR

I do not really understand how they could write in comments,

I, too, can hardly understand, and who writes our laws so that one protivrechit another, but still manage them with an intelligent view of all this comment!
Just clowns!

[LCR]

All this is relatively easy to understand, it is surprising that we have cities such fuss

I was more interested in another question: if in the case of public auctions information about the transactions can not be published and, therefore, is publicly available, as is the case with the tracking of gallery sales?
In Europe, all based on the vigilance and severity of sanctions, the fiscal authorities, which keep people in constant fear and accompany the development of law-abiding and civic-mindedness. Of course, the committed transactions "in black", in cash (for the French it - as a fast ride for Russian), but I think that such a tiny minority: cash pay 3000 euros more expensive items prohibited by law.

But in Russia, I think, the fiscal system has not reached perfection in Europe, so that even the most highly moral gallerist (do not be offended at me, dear gallery owners, you know how many good words I have written about you, and with what affection I regarded the profession, or at least to some of its officials!) may get the idea: Do not play me in the "commission"? He arranges a deal, gets his commission, and everyone is happy - except the artist: the public sale was not, the seller sold to the buyer = private transaction, the right route has covered one place. A? As you my idea? You already thought about this? Well, please, what I say

[Маруся]

Then my legal campaign against illiteracy simply not appropriate !

[Пар-И]

Сообщение от LCR

However, the very gift or sale of the author of his work is not a resale.

in this case, the resale of the word is a legal term and said the transition of ownership as I understand from the author to the first owner.

[LCR]

Сообщение от steam-I

in this case, the word resale is a legal term and said the transition of ownership as I understand from the author to the first owner.

Think about it: if the assignment of the author's work is the first resale, which means that a person who by selling his work, the author thereof, shall pay an additional 5%(or less, the right distance is inversely proportional to the value of the work, but it does not matter) from its value. With donations, and worse still: imagine that the person to whom the author has presented his work, must pay him the same 5%(but with any amount!), So this is - a goldmine for artists who can not sell their products: Dari every day on the picture and get their 5%, and the bread and butter money to

It is solely on transactions in which neither the author nor his successors did not participate. Correctly, daughter?

[Пар-И]

Сообщение от Maroussia

can manage with an intelligent view of all this comment!

I wanted to raise the moral and the ethical aspect and not a legal and intelligent, I do not want
This seemed all the words words .... ridiculous.

[LCR]

Сообщение от steam-I

I wanted to raise the moral and ethical dimension and not a legal and intelligent, I do not want
This seemed all the words of the word .... ridiculous.

Yes, this is not about you, Par-I, and the authors comments that you have read

[Пар-И]

Сообщение от LCR

Think about it: if the assignment of the author of his work is the first resale, this means that a person who by selling his work

after the first sale goes public resale of which the author .... .. This jur casuistry

Added after 8 minutes

Сообщение от LCR

everybody is happy - except the artist

Сообщение от LCR

so that even the most highly moral gallerist

About a decent relationship gallerist-hudozhnik.Dazhe minor payments gallerist heats the ice in their relationship.

[NATA NOVA]

Pereprodzha is always "alienation", but the alienation is not always "resale" ..

[Пар-И]

With no interest to the theme from .... it can be closed.