Kandinsky Prize 2009

[Евгений]

By Theme: Photo Essay on premises. A lot of interesting (EA)

Сообщение от Konstantin

It was in the CHA to the exhibition of Russian artists, Susan, and suddenly found ... Kandinsky. Went and did not regret. Good, interesting, more fun. Not at all inferior passed Biennale. First impression - funny farm, in the best sense of the word. Most exhibits task surprise, rather than admire. Sometimes it succeeds, sometimes not. But go and dive - intresno. Visitors as I noted in another Reporting - youth 20-35 years old, and the ticket costs 300 rubles. But worth it, spend time with pleasure.
'll Ask for my reportage to comment our editor in chief Vladimir Bogdanov. He is now firmly prepared for the seminar on investment in modern art and much in the subject.

[Евгений]

Сообщение от Konstantin

And they take part? Revised its photo essay and saw the work of these artists, and I photographed almost everything.

Constantine did not understand your question, are you talking about ...
-----------------------------------------------
 Shortlist went to 3 nominees.

Project of the Year "- 24 nominee (40 thousand euros):
Vadim Zakharov
Nicholas Polissky
Paul Pepperstein

"Young Artist of the Year. Project of the Year "- 10 nominees (up to 30 years, 10 thousand euros):
Eugene Antufiev
MAKEEV
Alexander Frolov

"Media art. Project of the Year "- 11 nominees (10 thousand euros):
Aristarchus Chernyshev and Alexei Shulgin
Julia Devlyashova and Alexander Toschevikova
Vadim Zakharov

[Konstantin]

In CHA Pepershteyna no. Of course I could not help but notice the darkness around was .
In the CHA is not all that I posted?

[Vladimir]

Сообщение от Eugene

Nick Polissky
Paul Pepperstein

In the project, the win or Pepperstein or Polissky. In favor Pepperstein very much: he is a career peak, Venice Biennale, hot cakes, and in general - a man honored. Problems in this case, two: "Kandinsky" - not "Triumph", it does not provide for the historical merits. A City of Russia "- super-draft, but not very new (in memory goes back to the year 2006-2007). Here a strong moment Polissky: "Large Hadron Collider - a new project, a relevant topic, ecology, social responsibility in all senses, the role of technology, the desire for knowledge, a million philosophical premise. Weak point is that no one can seem to me that the topic of multiple-run (though this is likely not). So 50 to 50. Personally, I want to win Pepperstein.

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от Vladimir

Personally, I want to win Pepperstein.

Me too.

Сообщение от Vladimir

Here begins a strong moment Polissky: "Large Hadron Collider - a new project, a relevant topic, ecology, social responsibility in all senses, the role of technology, the desire for knowledge, a million philosophical premise. Weak point is that no one can seem to me that the topic of multiple-run (though this is likely not the case).

It collider issue seemed too short-term, whether that ... Somehow on the image to the "News" appears. Tomorrow it will come down with Collider Web feeds and what will happen? Question-"what is it?" No, I vzgyad, I had this really interesting design to give the name of another, something from the "eternal", not needful segodnyaschnego day, so to speak, neutral, something ...
Although the tower, the 3rd International is the same ... But "Letatlin" too ...

[Евгений]

Сообщение от Konstantin

Let's try to guess who will take the first place.

Project of the Year "
Nicholas Polissky

"Young Artist of the Year.
Eugene Antufiev

"Media art. Project of the Year "
Aristarchus Chernyshev and Alexei Shulgin

[Konstantin]

By what criteria will score (well, except blat)? And on what criteria to assess you colleagues? Krtinery that the author is the peak of creativity, I do not like. But I liked Sergei Chelushkin - Adaptation, see my post number 21.

[Vladimir]

Сообщение от Konstantin

But I liked Sergei Chelushkin - Adaptation, see my post number 21.

His many discerned. Is that in this veschit it in such a shy version. He has a much greater things, not for the living room, but powerful. The seminar dedicated to him a few minutes.

Добавлено через 1 минуту

Сообщение от Konstantin

By what criteria will score (well, except blat)?

Blat is unlikely, as in many open and highly competitive areas. Too many interest groups and there is a jury. If the jury listened to all the influential, the Beliaev-Gintovt prize last year did not give B.

[Vladimir]

Сообщение от Konstantin

By what criteria will score (well, except blat)?

Blat is unlikely, as in many open and highly competitive areas. Too many interest groups and there is a jury. If the jury listened to all the influential, the Beliaev-Gintovt prize last year did not give B.

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от Konstantin

By what criteria will score (well, except blat)?

ArtChronika withdrawn are:
The criteria were:

Relevance. It is obvious that the product made at the prize, should address the problems of our time, fall into the sensitive points of society.

Artistic value. Combines concepts such as originality, novelty, mastery, plastic dignity. This is the most vulnerable, that is the most subjective criterion, without which, however, is indispensable. Suppose that in a situation of post-modernism good old concept of novelty and originality lost its absolute value, have finally renounce them is impossible, based on the very essence of creativity.

Backgrounds. Defines the activity of the artist, its relevance in the professional circles, participation in exhibitions, international projects, such as the Biennale and fair - in the end, its status.

Lobby. Every artist is a fan of his talent, a force that supports the artist, including the gallery owners, curators and collectors.

In my vzgyad-like enough. No?