Investment attraction works V. Titov

[LCR]

Сообщение от Tjutchev

All would be nothing if it is written, it was not in comparison with the works of other artists. All would be nothing if the artist Titov at least a little closer even to the very few significant name from the list.

Wow! My friend Tiutchev, easy ideas you have truly unusual - in fact, as befits a great poet.
Written, must be in a creative frenzy, but being here Titov? He is not a chair to break it!
To whom is he can not come close?
Do you really think that Elskaya - the light of Russian art (I take it as "the most insignificant of the artist from the list" in the hope that you do not challenge my choice)?
And correct me if I'm wrong, but I have seen in your text some inattention to Titov, the artist, whom you might not know well.

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от LCR

Titov, the artist, which you may be, is not well known.

I've been, like, it do not know much.

[Тютчев]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzransky

Not only joking, but expressed, in a joking, of course, fashion-opinion.
You do not like it, but I do not like it, for example, your favorite Bogolyubov.
Who shot? You, as a retrograde and admirer of the king of painters, or me, as a "traitor Rossssii" and not an Orthodox patriot? Or do without blood?

By Bogolubov I will be back. There was no time because of the Salon and in bulk cases. We invite you to discuss the topic, the more that you expressed in my theme several allegations.
      Not need to shoot anyone. Instead, propose to conduct a civilized discussion, ie argue his point of view and not use the methods of the "yellow press".
      Why in this particular topic to discuss our political beliefs. Let's talk about the investment attractiveness of the artist's works Titov. Here you consider whether their investment attractiveness? I am interested in your opinion as an art dealer. If you find them attractive, then who, in your opinion, could have bought this, because the notion of "skill", "talent", "aesthetics", "taste" no one has ever been canceled?

[color="# 666686"]Posted 6 minutes[/color]

Сообщение от LCR

Wow! My friend Tiutchev, easy ideas you have truly unusual - in fact, as befits a great poet.
Written, must be in a creative frenzy, but being here Titov? He is not a chair to break it!
To whom is he can not come close?
Do you really think that Elskaya - the light of Russian art (I take it as "the most insignificant of the artist from the list" in the hope that you do not challenge my choice)?
And correct me if I'm wrong, but I have seen in your text some inattention to Titov, an artist whom you might not know well.

With creativity Elskoy, I must confess, I do not know. That is all! How to - that I missed this point. But the work of other artists I have seen many times. When writing, thinking, of course, about them.

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от Tjutchev

Let's talk about the investment attractiveness of the artist's works Titova.

I have already said that is not familiar with him, nor had he ever engaged in, do not know much of his work ...

[SAH]

Сообщение от Tjutchev

who, in your opinion, could have bought this, because the notion of "skill", "talent", "aesthetics", "taste" no one has ever been canceled?

Yes, and is not "is" buy, you will not notice? About the taste - it is somehow not quite understand, the taste of it deeply personal. Ranzher showed the artist in his view of investment attractiveness, that's wrong. Artist interesting because even provoked debate, I like very interesting to learn the names of which I previously knew. Thanks to everyone who shares information, in this case Ranzheru.

[Grigory]

Please do not become personal!
Here are discussing the "investment attractiveness of the products of V. Titov, and more!

[Meister]

Сообщение от ranzher

Speaking of the undervaluation of some authors, it should be noted, and the fact that quite a number of names greatly overestimated. For example, V. Nemukhin, E. N. Elskaya Rukhin or not made in the world and Russian art is nothing that could justify the current prices of their work. The price vector of such artists in the light of the above reasons must turn 180 degrees, and the prices themselves take their rightful place.

can not talk like that ... And Nemukhin and Rukhin - recognized and formed the artists who took his place in history and very popular for collectors. Oprovegrat their undeniable contribution to the development of non-conformism as stupid as a change of day and night. The works of both of them very promising from an investment point of view, so you should not deny the obvious, to promote their artist. Of course, to the creation of a particular artist can be a different attitude, but bend with the assessment of other not worth it.

And personally LCR - Tselkov - fine artist, and you'll see even more costly than today. Nearest capacity - 500 thousand. Do not draw conclusions based solely on personal taste)))

P.S. Yes, even ranzher wrote that Titov works a little. So, in order that the artist had the investment prospects, it must create at least 100 works, but better than 150. Otherwise it simply will not market, and without this in any way.

[ФАИв]

Сообщение от Meister

So, in order that the artist had the investment prospects, it must create at least 100 works, but better than 150. Otherwise it simply will not market, and without this in any way.

How many famous works of Vermeer?

As V. Titov, the question interesting. It really is not the roads, and the artist present. BUT! Not everyone нравяться "shit" which he wrote. So level Veisberg Krasnopevtsev and he probably did not reach, and the best things Rukhin and Nemukhin - will be more expensive now and in the future.
Although I personally some of his things very much. In particular, those in which the mud and slush, and on top of all this calligraphic - some kind of banality written. Cool.

[NATA NOVA]

Сообщение от FAIv

Not everyone нравяться "shit" which he wrote.

And you can "shit" to the inspection request? (I'd like vzlyanut - can it not "shit" WOCE for someone?)
And then just talk ... no pictures .. (and uninteresting without images)