Art Moscow 13

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от Konstantin

And to those that exceed 10 000 $, the main question for so many, and whether to grow further.

Yes, not just to answer such questions, I understand. : D

[Vladimir]

Target should be honest. For example: you get is not an investment asset with reasonable risk and predictability, and a prestigious consumer goods, which is intended to emphasize your status and deliver aesthetic pleasure. For this, and pay. In addition, in the commodity and laid lottery potential. In the best of circumstances the price of any product may grow in value many times over.

[Физик]

Сообщение от Konstantin

interested in modern artists in the age, I determine for itself, up to 50 years. And the prices at which up to 10 000 $. And for those that exceed 10 000 $, the main question for so many, and whether to grow further.

Here age may be a little more, because "sixties", then those who attended, many are working full swing and exhibited. Many artists are not included in any group, their ideas were, but now, when the market and already there was talk that we should sell various art ... And yes prices, rising. The fact that in 2003 was worth $ 800 now more than twice ... Even the simple themes, still lifes, etc.

[Vladimir]

Сообщение от Physics

Here age may be a little more, because "sixties", then those who attended, many are working full swing and exhibited.

Job sixties already living on antique rules. There are statistics and the auction and place in art has already been defined. Risks of investing in the first row of artists unofficial art is not so much. This is another topic. Unfortunately, the work of the sixties is expensive and not directed at consumers. The price of issue is usually 50-100 thousand dollars

[Konstantin]

And yes prices, rising. The fact that in 2003 was worth $ 800 now more than twice ... Even the simple themes, still lifes, etc.

No, because in the "general" does not respond properly, let us names.