Your opinion about this picture

[Amateur]

Сообщение от OlegTsi

Amateur, Maybe you should not have to provide the text of the inventory?

That would be a reasonable solution. Had made a photo picture and asked to express an opinion on it as a painting by an unknown artist. They asked to make hypotheses about the possible authorship. I am sure the debate would become a much more practical nature. And you immediately - Rembrandt ... For detection of unknown paintings by Rembrandt would be without any exaggeration, an event of world significance. Miracles happen, but, basically, in fairy tales, so forum users and have decided that you tell them a story.

On language. We're not discussing your personal statements, but only the style and language of the "inventory" , drawn not by you. At the forum a lot of people whose native language is not Russian, they will never have absolutely no complaints. Moreover, the forum will be only too happy to add new members and expanding its geography. But agree that the inventory of an unknown until now confidently assert the authorship of paintings by Rembrandt, you must have good human (or even better - art history) education. Such education requires a good command of language as a matter of razumeescheesya. And when you see some, shall we say, "rough" language, and inaccuracies in terms involuntarily begin to doubt and professional qualifications of the man who wrote this "inventory", as well as in its conclusions.

You personally have absolutely no complaints. You did the right thing, had doubts about the authorship of Rembrandt. And if you think that the discussion was somehow marked hurt you, then please accept an apology.

[Vladimir]

Сообщение от OlegTsi

Why personal criticism for making a topic for discussion (the site to find, register and offer ... Rembrandt). What to offer? Who and whom to invite? I asked your opinion, because it is doubted in the Rembrandt. If I had foreseen the intonation of your comments, never used in my life would open the topic for discussion.

OlegTsi, do not take to heart. Before you respond, please note, who exactly makes a comment. And it was there earlier in the comments vysskazyvayuschegosya Validating anything useful. It happens that people come to the forum to practice in sarcasm - what can you do, the party publicity.

[Allena]

OlegTsi, completely agrees with the authors of posts 14 and 15.

Сообщение от OlegTsi

This is not a literary forum for poets, writers, linguists and readers.

Quite true, but you yourself know very well how important for the attribution may have documents. Major participants in our forum pay attention even to trifles.

[Кирилл Сызранский]

I've just noticed the message OlegTsi, they are sensible, interesting, is immediately obvious that the new party knows what wrote.
"ABC" Narbut, Trush, "Steinberg family sheltered themselves after a period of Boris Sveshnikov", it is understandable that people in the topic etc.
I have such "newcomers" nicer and more interesting than many ...

[Jasmin]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzransky

I have such "newcomers" nicer and more interesting than many ...

Oh, it's not about me? I'm also already Newbie ... just yesterday drew attention to ...: confused:

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Jasmin, Naah, not about you ...
Congratulations to "starozhilstvom "...

[Игорь Гурьев]

Very average picture late 19 - early 20 th century.
It is unclear how the school.

[sergejnowo]

It is clear that he did not.
Apparently the work of the late 19 th century, or even younger.
The tree on which the written work, a typical basis for the second half of the 19 th century in the style of old masters.
It can be attributed more to Repin than Rembrandt.

[K-Maler]

Сообщение от sergejnowo

It is clear that he did not.
Apparently the work of the late 19 th century, or even younger.

This is not a Rembrandt, not because he wrote and drew a little better, but, most importantly, there is no sense of the image, in which recognizable Rembrandt and valued.

[Евгений]

Discussion at the forum "Rembrandt" sense?
---------------------------------------------
The research project "Rembrandt" (born Rembrandt Research Project) - the Amsterdam team of scientists, formed in 1968 for the study of Rembrandt's artistic heritage in order to verify its authenticity and the actual origin of the great artist's brush.

Читать дальше... 

Many of the works attributed to Rembrandt, were made by his pupils and apprentices and for centuries were sold under his name, by the middle of XX century there were more than a few thousand. Research project "Rembrandt" gave sensational results: pictures, previously known as Rembrandt's works, was denied authorship of the artist, which led to serious criticism of the project by the museum community.

To determine the authorship of works by Rembrandt was difficult even to his contemporaries, as Rembrandt often only with difficulty be distinguished from the works of other artists: Howarth Flink, John Livensa or Arent de Gelder. From paintings of Rembrandt in his studio often write copy and replicas. For example, we know the ten versions of the picture "Judas returned the thirty pieces of silver", which can not be clearly defined to attribute the artist. Sometimes, in order to identify the author, using archival documents, literary references, or engravings, reproductions, but they do not have sufficient reliability. In addition, natural-science research is conducted, as well as the work involves experts in the field of quality and stylistic peculiarities of the artist. So it is possible to establish similarities and differences in comparison with the works that have no supporting documentation.
Site http://www.rembrandtresearchproject.org/index.php?5