Artist Leo Tabenkin

[ВЯЧЕСЛАВ]

Сообщение от Eugene

Vyacheslav, there are artists Shilov, Nikas Safronov, Mikhail Satarov, you can enjoy them, everything is beautiful, clean, smoothed ...
-------------------------------------------------- ---
For VYACHESLAV, site of Michael Satarova ....
http://www.satarov.ru/page.php?vrub=...9&lang=rus
-------------------------------------------------- ----

Thank you for your concern, but you have the wrong door.
Your Satarov - glamorous sediment, hiding behind arguments about academism and classicism. I do not know what motivates them in abusive arguments about Chagall and Malevich. Perhaps aware of its weakness, in spite of "the freedom that gave money."
Here, the forum has many fans, "glamor" http://forum.artinvestment.ru/showthread.php?t=37245. All questions on Satarov-to them.

Speaking of N. Safronov. He was at the opening ceremony in Odessa on 30 August and vootchiyu seen as a syrup poured from the lips of many local "aktualschikov" position themselves "fans nonkomformizma all times and peoples." Ottoptali each other legs and scored elbows to touch the "beautiful".

[gans]

Сообщение от Konstantin

I think even cause a positive picture, and characters are good, though "unusual".

me too much, not noticed any negatives. Yes, there are author's style, but this is largely positive, in my opinion.

[color="# 666686"]Added after 1 minute[/color]

Сообщение от VYACHESLAV

Here's say - can LA Tabenkin draw the usual kettle or a box of matches, that they live in the painting, called the tide of an ordinary human warmth.

Of course tomorrow.

[Pavel]

How can like gray painting. Painting gray does not exist. When an artist can not write, he begins to tell how it would be nice that he wanted to write. These artists are not there nor here-vsegdaodnoobrazny and boring and political background is the only thing that is there and is confusing. Primitive.

[Евгений]

Сообщение от Pavel

Primitive.

Are you about his paintings? Agree ..

[Konstantin]

Are you about his paintings? Agree ..

Eugene This is a bust. Paul openly showed us what he is doing what, especially as he in his statements about other artists, does not say "I'm better." Let us argue with him not at a level "And what about who?" Yes, even with glasses and a hat, but essentially the theme. He does not like painting Tabenkin, because it is gray ... Well, the view, as if yes, not very bright colors.
But most importantly, is it in the number of colors on the canvas?
Is this a criterion of quality?
That's what let's ask Paul.