Charles Saatchi: Sharks are good, and feces artists - too

[Тютчев]

Сообщение от Meister

quotation from an interview with Saatchi magazine "Journal des Arts" in 2004: "snobbery of those who think that art is only available starry-eyed, I just laugh. God willing, none of the actors of the art market has never joins the estetatam ".

Mr. Saatchi for some reason believes that snobbery and aestheticism is the same thing. However, these terms have different meanings. snobbery - is the manner of human behavior, a claim to elitism. Snob value items for their first class, but not for their quality. Aestheticism emphasizes the predominance of aesthetic values of ethical and over social issues.
      Saatchi as it equates them. Why? Perhaps, then, to have more freedom and not be limited to the principles of aesthetes who believe the beauty of the main factor in the art. Indeed, why limit yourself? Moreover, the beauty of this thing at all capricious and unreliable. Invest in some ephemeral as something silly for a businessman. On the beauty of money will not do! Now if we could set itself is beautiful, and what is not. What is important and what is not. Wow! However, what about the other stubborn notion - "the creative process, how to manage it and its only member - the artist? We're rightly believe that the artist - the main subject of art. Saatchi believes much the same but with a small caveat: the artist - the main character, but only in his performance, where he is, a gallery owner, is a director. So, it was he introduces new characters and adjusts the game actors. This is quite typical of America, where, for example, instead of author's cinema film producer, dominates. In the art business is the same: it is the gallery set the tone, they make choices and elevate artists to the heights of success.
                   All would be good, if not a paradox that arises in connection with the foregoing. Saatchi, laughing at the snobbery of "those who think that art is only available starry-eyed, he himself had his work creates a new elitism, offering its first-class artists for all those same snobs who buy art, created by new artists - idols, which, in its turn, produce such as Saatchi. In this case, what I said Saatchi, can be rephrased, without loss of meaning, thus: "Those who see themselves as aesthetes, no not aesthetes and snobs! Aesthetics - it is generally a relative concept. And if so, then I, Saatchi, will tell you what art is and point you to what you want to buy. You may also call snobs and fools, but you know something that is not true. Because we agree with you that you are not snobs, and my clients. And I can not make mistakes, because I'm cool, successful guy and me in the newspapers and magazines, well and that I myself am ordering these items, it is a trifle, not worthy of your precious attention. Believe me! I-Saatchi! I! I! I am! "

[Mark]

Сообщение от Tjutchev

quote from an interview with Saatchi magazine "Journal des Arts" in 2004:

Good article, giving the keys to understanding the driving forces of the art market, sent the market-makers and curators, feeding them with his hands. However, such an approach, with a fair amount of healthy cynicism, was to determine the market in the second half of XIX century. Here is what this old man Livshits in his book "The Crisis of Ugliness" back in 1960:

Читать дальше... 

<...> As for the economy, it should not be forgotten that Cubism was at the very beginning had its business relationships. The independence of the young Picasso was supported Vollarom, behind Braque was a German businessman Wilhelm Uhde. But the main finance minister Cubism was Daniel Henry Kanveyler. after the war gave place to Leonce Rosenberg. The case was fairly widespread. Already outlined during the Durand-Ruelle possibility of speculation in rising fashion trends for the first time adopted here is quite real forms. Private Galleries, then there are shops for the sale of paintings, exhibitions of "abroad (from 1909 to 1914, Picasso had several solo exhibitions in England, Germany, Spain, America, not to mention his participation in a joint exhibition Cubists in Russia), promotional material such series to be released by Rosenberg, the seizure of a group of artists-Cubists advantageous position in the Salon of Independent by this "pronunciamentos 1911 - all these little resemblance to sacrifice.

<...>

What was the real underside of painting at the very beginning of the century, shows evidence of good knowledge of life and customs of their environment Camilla Mockler - art critic, is quite sympathetic to the first generation of innovators, but not beyond. Speaking of that open unknown geniuses became the fashion and business is acquired as a sporting interest, Mockler lamented the consequences of such intrusions into the world of art "counterfeit coin". Opened a real opportunity to declare someone an artist regardless of his actual talent, wrote Mockler. The success increasingly depends on the play of forces, and a work of art has ceased to be himself oboe - it becomes a function, an echo of the external activity of the artist, or rather, a certain group, can make their people.

<...>

The value of the work here has a lower priority than perfect methods of creating fashion for the artist. We see the masterpieces of this kind, as a trader paintings works wonders and its system is a magnificent organization. Thus, the invasion of capital in the history of art, so noticeable in recent decades, began in the era of Cubism.

<...>

The scandal associated with the emergence of a new painting, it was inevitable not because it is far superior to the average human understanding, but because without it there would not be the most modern painting. She is and was not so much in the arts, but in particular the behavior of the actor. Human activities with a palette has become a symbol of negation of all accepted norms. In short, it was not so much paintings as a program for a scandal.

<...>

Concept of "revolutionary" has any meaning only if it concrete content. And this is especially true nowadays, when the abuse of such concepts occur at every step

<...>

Incidentally, the recently deceased was quite well-known artist Yves Klein expressed the same idea, but without words, practically. By the end of his life he no longer selling artwork, and the net share of innovation without translating it to the canvas. In receipt of money Klein gave a receipt, which the lover of painting could hang in his living room ... .... Magical gesture Klein is the culmination of a long series of such gestures, which are gradually released "contemporary art" from the obligation to be the real thing related to drawing, chiaroscuro and color, that is, freed from the obligation to be art in the old sense of the word. Here begins something else.

<...>

Erotic, pathology of the nervous system, the political allusions, the criticism of civilization, the latest scientific discoveries, space, all possible kinds of strong stimuli, always new and unexpected, all external symbols, but not painting!

<...>

It is crowd trampled praises of the new criterion for their own value products, attributing the art of completely extraneous purpose. We saw above that Impressionist painting is attributed to the proof of "conditional nature of color, and Cubist painting -" conditional nature of space. " Such phraseology is walking, the system of words accompanying the triumphant march of new artistic techniques. These explanations make the artist in the half-educated art historian who writes his dissertation on the canvas in order to prove something or other

.

[Тютчев]

"Incidentally, the recently deceased was quite well-known artist Yves Klein expressed the same idea, but without words, almost. At the end of his life he was no longer selling artwork, and the net share of innovation without translating it into cloth. At the receipt of money Klein gave a receipt, which the lover painting could hang in his living room ... .... Magic gesture Klein is the culmination of a long series of such gestures, which are gradually released "contemporary art" from the obligation to be the real thing related to drawing, chiaroscuro and color, that is, freed from the obligation to be adept at former sense of the word. Here begins something else. "


Thank you, Mark! Excellent article.

It begins aware that: policy and great grandmother!

[Тютчев]

30 questions to Charles Saatchi. Part 1

A Briton of Iraqi origin, Charles Saatchi (Charles Saatchi) is one of the most famous collectors of works of art in the world. He was born in Baghdad in 1943. Family Saatchi moved to London, where the future megakollektsioneru was four years old. He attended high school Christ's College.
In 1970, Charles and his brother Maurice (Maurice Saatchi) founded the advertising agency Saatchi & Saatchi, which became one of the largest in the world. The most known project of the agency - the campaign of the British Conservative Party, for which the brothers came up with a slogan Labour isn't working ( «Work is not working" - a reference to the eternal enemies of conservatives - the Labor Party, or Trudoviks). Through the campaign the party won elections in 1979, and its leader, Margaret Thatcher (Margaret Thatcher) became Prime Minister.
Charles Saatchi began collecting art in the early 1970's. In 1985 he opened a Baunderi Road gallery. In 2003, she moved to the building of the District Council, situated on the south bank of the Thames. However, two years later it had to shut down: blame the tension with the owner of the premises. Last fall, at the Kings Road has opened a new gallery.
Saatchi became famous for the fact that the world discovered the "new British artists - Damien Hirst (Damien Hirst), Tracey Emin (Tracey Emin), Chapman brothers, and others. In 1997, a protege of Saatchi creations were exhibited at the scandalous exhibition Sensation at the Royal Academy of Arts. "A shark in formaldehyde" Hirst, painting with elephant dung by Chris Ofili (Chris Ofili), a portrait of filicide Myra Hindley (Myra Hindley), made by Marcus Harvey (Marcus Harvey), - all that was presented there.
In 2006, the collector has opened an online gallery of Saatchi Online, which exhibit their work can anyone. Earlier this year he announced the launch of its own reality show - Best of British, «Star Factory" for artists. Show starts in November this year.
September 8 in the publishing house Phaidon published autobiography Saatchi called "My name is Charles Saatchi, and I artogolik". In honor of the book in the Guardian newspaper published a long interview with the collector. ARTinvestment.RU is its translation.


Question: You are famous for their ability to discover new talents. However, it was felt that the greatest artists are always misunderstood by his contemporaries ...
Charles Saatchi: In general, these talents are few and misunderstood geniuses are much less frequently than mediocrity, which is extolled to the skies.

Читать дальше... 

Q: You are called "superkollektsionerom" and "the most successful art dealer of our time." How would you characterize your work in the past 20 years?
CS: Yes I am over this much minds. Generally, by and large, collectors of works of art are not so important. What really matters, what remains for centuries - is an art. I buy art that I like. I buy the product in order to display them at exhibitions. And then, if you want, I sell them and buy new ones. I had these 30 years, and I think most of those associated with art, know about it. If I sell a product, it does not mean that they lose one's attraction to me. Just not like I keep for years.

Q: You entered a fashionable investment in the creativity of promising artists, and this practice has largely determined the current state of the art market: following your example, many people, both novice investors, and the wise elder collectors hunt for the works of young, yet not very well known authors. Do you agree with the fact that it was thanks to your work of modern art market is a speculative nature?
CS: I hope that everything is as you say. Artists need collectors, many different collectors willing to buy their art.

Q: Do you think that can ruin someone's life, deciding to get rid of all his creations?
CS: I'm not going to buy the product only in order to please the artist, as well as to sell his creation in order to ruin his life. Do not do this melodrama.

Q: What do you want to do before they went into advertising?
CS: I did not want to - it armistice. When I was 17, I could boast only that passed the two final exams, and that is not the first attempt, so that the career prospects did not have any. Consultant guidance of our Christ's Sollege could not help me, he did even in the face did not know - I was the worst truants. With the announcement in the newspaper Evening Standard, I was able to get a job as a clerk with a salary 10 pounds a week. My employer was a tiny ad agency in Covent Garden, and I was required to bypass all the newspapers on the street Fleet Street - then there were hundreds of these revisions - and collect the old rooms, where they were placed advertisements of our clients. I had to take the newspaper, find the page with ads and paste there the tab so that the client knew that his announcement appeared there, and paid to our agency. As you can see, my post was great. One of the advantages of working in the tiny agency was that when their creative department, consisting of one young man who suddenly fell ill, they did not know what to do and turned to me and asked to make a commercial for one of their clients, [poultry] Thornber Chicks . Advertisement intended for a magazine [for farmers and cattle breeders] Farmer and Stock-Breeder and had to convince farmers that the laying hens Thornber able to provide them with cheap and of good quality eggs, so invest in them very profitable. I do not know how to write advertising slogans, and generally not able to write almost anything, except the phrase "I do not miss the meeting, which I had to use very often. I flipped through magazines Farmer and Stock-Breeder and Poultry World, chose few encouraging "positive" words and phrases that brought them together, prisobachil title - I think I stole it from an old American newspaper - and get the advertising campaign, "Ask that, from whom they already have, with joyful farmers Thornber. The customer was satisfied.

Q: Is it true that love for art, especially Renaissance painting on a biblical theme, brings man to God?
CS: I think God is very disappointed with his creation. Mankind has not evolved especially since the creation: we are just as stupid and primitive as they were centuries ago, and the poor, God is probably the whole day sitting and sad because of our vileness and stupidity everywhere. Or maybe he is laughing at us. But I hope that our art to God like, and he will forgive the sins of humanity - mine in particular.

Q: I like your new gallery, but the [Old] gallery in the building of the District Council, I just hated. What were you thinking!
CS: I was a fool, a fool and a fool again. My first gallery, on Baunderi Road, I knew so well that he could sit in a lounge chair in Margate, to within a centimeter to say, where there hangs a painting - and I was bored. Besides, I wanted a new skill learned about a lot of people, and building on the south bank of the Thames, from Ferris wheel London Eye, is suitable for this task much better. So my art has moved from the bright, spacious rooms at Baunderi Road in a small room with walls upholstered oak panels. And no one did not like it. I set myself a challenge, which ultimately proved to be unbearable for me.

Q: What Works artists decorate your house? Perhaps you are constantly changing the "exposure"? Do you have any favorite works, which always you hang?
CS: I care mess. But soon we will finally hang some of the pictures that are still "live" on the floor.

Q: Which of your "discoveries" You can name the most enjoyable?
CS: I was lucky - since [I started collecting] sometimes I could see the works of great artists who are at the beginning of a creative way, and I am always glad that he had met with the world. Nevertheless, I also "discovered" a huge number of artists, which no one except me, was not interested in their career and develop very slowly, if at all developed. So no "infallible intuition" for potentially successful artists I have not. To be fair, I bought the work of Cindy Sherman (Cindy Sherman), exhibited at the first group exhibition in which she participated - among them were black and white images from the films, which then amounted to a collage of 10 images. In the next few years I have acquired many of her works. I also bought most of the works, which were presented at the first exhibition of Jeff Koons (Jeff Koons), held in New York's East Village, belonged to some artist of the small gallery, which is now gone. There were basketballs floating in glass aquariums, as well as vacuum cleaners and other appliances in the shop windows filled with fluorescent lights. But to praise myself, I do not want - the truth is that good artists, which I did not pay attention, as much as those whom I have "Hello."

Q: Investing in art is probably more profitable than the shark in formaldehyde? Hirst's shark (Damien Hirst) looks worse and worse, and the painting by Peter Doig (Peter Doig) in 10 years will be as beautiful as it is now, and restore it would be much easier.
CS: There are no rules of investing do not exist. Can invest in sharks. And in the wastes can be an artist. And in oil painting. Now there is a whole army of conservatives who are ready to take care of keeping all that an artist would call art.

Q: Why in the Tate collection of Brit-art worse than in museums outside the country?
CS: Because in the early 1990's, when even the most bobtailed budget could provide you with an excellent collection of art, curators of the Tate looked unclear where. But I'm not better. I am a regular "open" for themselves already known artists, which in its time has not noticed or ignored.

Q: What, in your view, would be in the British art of the beginning of the XXI century a hundred years? What contemporary artists will be the test of time and will be considered great?
CS: The authors of books about art, dating from 2105 year will be as ruthlessly edited the end of the twentieth century, like all other periods in art history. All artists, except for Jackson Pollock (Jackson Pollock), Andy Warhol (Andy Warhol), Donald Judd (Donald Judd), and Damien Hirst can expect a maximum of short mention.

Q: If you decide to order your own portrait, what would you have chosen - a painting, sculpture or some more?
CS: I would rather eat cardboard than ask someone to write it to me.

Q: How do you feel in the role of the wife "the goddess of the hearth" (wife Saatchi, Naydzhella Lawson (Nigella Lawson), is the host of a popular culinary TV show. - Ed.)?
CS: She's too good for me, I know, but she knows it too, and reminds me of it every day.

Q: Do you ever cook?
CS: I know how to cook an omelet. And corn flakes.
Q: Are you striving to ensure that your children are interested in your art, went to museums and galleries?

CS: In the view of my children, everything connected to my gallery, can not be steep. But the shop in the gallery they can easily taste.


Q: What advice you and your spouse give to children?
CS: Mom Naydzhelly told her, the essence of "good behavior". Says Naydzhella, her advice sounded something like this: "Better to be enchanted than charm. She meant that the man most loves himself chiefly then, when he feels that in some situations, it was fascinating and interesting that he listened. In her view, the desire to attract attention and be the most amazing person in the room is vulgar and shows a completely inappropriate vanity. Trying to be charming - means to indulge their whims, allow others to charm yourself - is to be brought up.

Q: How do you feel about the fact that the state spends more money on something to save the masterpieces of old masters for the nation? Is it more important than the purchase of works by artists of new generation?
CS: At the risk of again incurring the wrath of an art community, I say that now there is no need to "save" the picture for the nation by supporting the young art. What is the difference, which hangs Titian - National Gallery, the Louvre or the Uffizi Gallery? Now is not the XVIII century, people go around the world, and it is not necessary to awaken in them a sense of nationalism with the treasures of world art. Support living artists is much more important.

Q: What is your favorite museum?
CS: The Prado Museum in Madrid. I have a weakness for creative work of Goya, and the museum itself so unpretentious, and all of his masterpieces are on display without any fanfare. With every visit there, I reinforce the opinion that art will always be important.

Q: I know very little about contemporary art, but I have a thousand pounds, which I want somewhere to invest. Something recommend?
CS: Premium bonds. Good to earn on the art you can, only if you are very lucky and get a "bypass" the professionals in their territory. Buy only what you really like and will for years to give you a thousand pounds of happiness. And not in a hurry, looking for something truly special. Select [works of art for the collection] - is a separate pleasure.

Q: Which of your accomplishments are you most proud of?
CS: I'm not proud. This does not mean that I do not have egos the size of an airplane hangar, but I'm not proud of it even.

Q: How much money you lost in a recession?
CS: Even thinking about it I'm afraid.

Q: Do not you think that the pictures with circles (Damien Hirst. - Ed.) Look like wallpaper?
CS: One could also say that the paintings Rothko (Mark Rothko) look as beautiful rugs. There is nothing wrong with that some works of decorative art.

Q: People say that Mark Rothko's paintings evoke the idea of infinity. What do you think?
CS: "Infinity" I understand this: every one hundred years sparrow flies to the top of big mountains and cleans its beak on the highest rock. When a rock, podtochennaya [sparrow-beak], has become a small handful of dust, can be said to have passed the first second of infinity. I thought about this last time, when standing in front of Rothko's work, but the sense of infinity, I was not absorbed and no mystical insights I had not. Maybe I've seen too many paintings by Rothko and no longer feel the pulsations of their unearthly splendor. Or maybe I never realized what wonderful Rothko.

Q: Do you think the exhibition Sensation culmination of your career, after which all slowed down a bit?
CS: Well, no one is pleased to hear that their best days behind. But perhaps you're right. Of course, once I was more active, more engaged in their advertising business and collecting art with wild energy. Now I'm tired, but I still like to organize an exhibition of my favorite art and introduce visitors to our gallery with the works of new artists, and I hope that these goals are worthy to continue on this path to go.

Q: Do you think someone from the early deaths of artists - Jean-Michel Basquiat (Jean-Michel Basquiat), Eva Hesse (Eva Hesse), Felix Gonzalez-Torres (Felix Gonzalez-Torres) - could be truly great?
CS: Although it sounds a bit cynical, I can not see that many artists become cult status because they die before they turn their creativity into the endless repetition of already traversed. Pollock was honored for his masterpieces, but we do not know what would have happened to him, if he painted another 30 years. The works of Basquiat I never particularly liked, despite the efforts of its dealer Annino Nosey (Annina Nosei). She led me into his cellar, where the boy he painted and talked to anyone who was not too lazy to listen to what the young Basquiat - a genius, but his paintings are just $ 500. I am a fool, thought that his painting unoriginal and decorative - is one example of why my tastes can not be trusted. Eva Hesse has been tremendous. Felix Gonzalez-Torres - not quite. My beloved, pardon the expression, the deceased artist who could compete with all of them - is Scott Burton (Scott Burton). About him little say in the late 1970's, he made such bizarre furniture that can be perceived as a sculpture, and sculpture, similar to furniture - for example, "stone chairs", which he created by making two cuts on the cobblestones. He is now almost forgotten, there are only a handful of his fans who revered him even then, and very rare to find his work on large exhibitions of American art. That he was so.

VA: Alfred Hitchcock (Alfred Hitchcock) or John Ford (John Ford)? Martin Scorsese (Martin Scorcese), or Spielberg (Steven Spielberg)?
CS: I'm always glad when I can see the best films of these directors. We Naydzhelloy arrange for a small film festivals - for example, the season of William Wyler (William Wyler), Ridley Scott (Ridley Scott) and Fred Zinnemann (Fred Zinnemann). In films of the great directors I admire each frame.

Q: Can you draw or paint?
CS: Just do not know how.

Q: Who will be the new star of modern art?
CS: Hopefully, this will show our TV project.


Material prepared Yulia Maksimova


Permanent news address:
http://artinvestment.ru/news/artnews...interview.html

[color="# 666686"]Added after 7 minutes[/color]
30 questions to Charles Saatchi.


September 8 in the publishing house Phaidon published autobiography of the British megakollektsionera Charles Saatchi (Charles Saatchi), entitled "My name is Charles Saatchi, and I artogolik". On the occasion of the book's publication the Guardian newspaper claimed in an interview with the collector. The first part, consisting of 29 questions and answers was published on our website yesterday. And the most important question Saatchi said in his book.

The main question is: what do you think about the art world?
We have with David Sylvester (art critic, 1924-2001. - Ed.) Was a silly game: we asked each other, with someone from the art-world personalities - artists, curators, collectors and critics - we least like to spend a few years on an uninhabited island. Of course, each of the categories listed above does not suffer from lack of heinous representatives, and we always answer the question differently, depending on who is to us last week the most boring. Such are the conclusions we eventually reached.

Dealers
I love the arts, according to some of my friends, collectors, there is a dark side - you have to communicate with a certain type of art dealers. This pretentious, arrogant and overbearing "Keepers of the public taste" should be on the face control at the club stand, to decide who to let, and who not. Their arrogant behavior discourages many novice collectors and prevents them how to understand the work of artists. These dealers are very fond of thinking that they "control" the market. But when the market is the artist's "blooms", then it becomes impossible to manage. Recently, one prominent New York gallery owner said that he does not like a good auction results of one of his wards, because now collectors are not required to stand in line for his work. Instead of rejoicing in the success of the artist, it is to sneer at the fact that someone is deprived of his power. Of course, dealers are not always so - there are real visionaries, without which many of the great artists of our time would have passed unnoticed.

Critics
Art critics of some British newspapers with the same success could settle in the section "Horticulture" or "Travel" and happy to work there until retirement. Many newspaper editors do not have enough time to ensure that both should read the reviews section, and the art they are, it seems to me, not very interested. Therefore, we can now see how the critics fall into the ecstasy of the works of artists who are ignored or ridiculed a decade ago - and all because these artists are now considered respected and satisfied with first-class exhibitions. For such critics, probably hamstring shake the thought that comes some villain and tknet their noses in their old writings. And when Matthew Collings (Matthew Collings), star of television art critic, said that the loss of many works of art in a warehouse on fire Momart - it is "okay" because "the artists are young, still write, you know all about the evil nature Some citizens, who earn their living with stories about art. Nevertheless, there is nothing better than a critic, who perfectly understands his subject and writes so that you open any new depths.
NB Some time later, after I wrote it, I was a little talk with Matthew Collings, and I realized that I really like. It's a pity that I decided to quarrel on him, rather than someone else of our most respected art critics.

Supervisors
With very few exceptions, all of them toured the world-famous curators who organize all Biennale and other mega-exhibitions, work, holding in one hand, the electronic guide, in the other - a book like "You - a connoisseur of art theory. How to convince others. All their projects are the same as the days of the protagonist in the movie "Groundhog Day". They are arranged only to two and a half, hundreds of people who share the same ideas, they saw and praised. It seems that no show is not carried out, except those "remarks on the socio-political themes, in which either no soul, no life, only the claim. Everywhere some relics of 1970's Conceptualism, boring photos and texts in frames, though descended from the conveyor installation banal impenetrable, gloomy dark room where screens show indistinguishable from each other video - here's a result of decades of curatorial lawlessness. The fact that the pictures write all of the forty-five artists nominated for the Turner Prize in the past 10 years, raises questions not about a crisis in painting, but what we have curators. But sometimes in a different way: when you see a very special exhibition, organized by people who sincerely loves his job, then you understand that we owe so much to a remarkable curators and their memorable exhibitions. Unforgettable in the literal sense - you will forever remain in memory, that they exhibited, where and how.
NB Since writing this note [passed a few years], and several award ceremony Turner. Of the 16 nominees are two painters.


Artists
If you decide to explore some great work of art, you'll likely find that its creator was a genius. And geniuses are different from us to you. So let's not calling them capricious, self-centered, impudent and infantile. Artist - the most difficult profession of all possible, and all who decided to earn a living art - a little crazy. All the artists I love.

Collectors
Of course, many collectors do not collect art because of love for him. Many people want so show that they deserve to occupy a high position in society, some simply want to decorate the walls. But I admire the fact that more and more rich people decide to collect contemporary art, rather than race horses, antique cars, jewelry and yachts. If they do not, then the art world all would be run by the state. And we all would be allowed to look only at work, approved by the apparatchiks of the Ministry of Culture. If I were asked, whose taste I trust more - [rich] Goldfarb spouse or bureaucrat who, in another scenario, be prepared any tax documents - then I would have chosen Goldfarb. In any case, some of my friends collectors simply charming people. They have enough energy and enthusiasm, and communicate with them - it is a pleasure.

Permanent news address:
http://artinvestment.ru/news/artnews...interview.html

[Тютчев]

Сообщение от AlexanderG

Saatchi magnat potomu, chto on sozdaiot rynok. On ne sleduet, a lidiruet.
Vy ze znaete, chem on ran'she zanimalsia? Poetomu i lidiruet.

Сообщение от Tjutchev

Or, rather, creates the illusion of leadership. And people believe ... Time will pass and everything will fall into place ... But when it will be?

Сообщение от AlexanderG

A vsio i tak na mestah. On ostanetsia v istorii, plody ego deiatel'nosti toze.

Added a 52 seconds
Vernee, on uze istoriia.

Сообщение от Tjutchev

Do you believe that all artists Saatchi is really so interesting, as they now stand? Every last one genius?

Сообщение от AlexanderG

Ia nichego ne govoril o hudoznikah, ia govoril o Saatchi. Pri chiom zdes' hudozniki?

What to do with it? He makes the names!

[AlexanderG]

Сообщение от Tjutchev

How do I do with it? He makes the names!

Pravil'no, eto ego rabota, za kotoruiu on ostanetsia v istorii.

Ne sovsem ponimaiu vashe neponimanie

Ia nichego ne govoril o hudoznikah voobsche. Moi liubimyi Duveen - kakaia raznitsa, chto on prodaval, vazno kak.

V dannom kontekste akuly i pr vtorichny.

[Тютчев]

Сообщение от Yaya

And it seemed to me remarkable that despite the fact that its Hurst, by and large, tossed, he believes AX great artist. This is amazing!

He created it! How can you not love your creation! Children love these, they are ... Oh, children, children! ...

[Veronic]

Сообщение от Tiutchev

"Incidentally, the recently deceased was quite well-known artist Yves Klein expressed the same idea, but without words, almost. At the end of his life he was no longer selling artwork, and the net share of innovation without translating it into cloth. In obtaining Klein gave the receipt of money by an amateur painting could hang in his living room ... .... Magic gesture Klein is the culmination of a long series of such gestures, which are gradually released "contemporary art" from the obligation to be the real thing related to drawing, chiaroscuro and color, that is released from the obligation to be art in the old sense of the word. Here begins something else. "


Thank you, Mark! Excellent article.

It begins aware that: policy and great grandmother!

That is probably it's all over. Sell air, that is, the idea of pure art.

[AlexanderG]

Сообщение от Veronic

That is probably it's all over. Sell air, that is, the idea of pure art.

A chto ze eschio mezdu kartinoi v $ 1,000 i $ 10,000,000?

[ikoku]

Veronic now, probably it's all over. Sell air, that is, the idea of pure art.


AlexanderG A chto ze eschio mezdu kartinoi v $ 1,000 i $ 10,000,000


But I think this idea is as old as the world.
 I've also pondered how something on the theme of zeros, we obtain an interesting picture (sorry, a little pofilosofstvuyu). Many things in this world that people sometimes seek simply linked with zeros, not the actual quality of life in principle. For example, a machine for $ 10 000, but I'd like for $ 100 000 you can buy shoes for $ 100, but the dream of those for $ 1000, for more prestigious, a boutique, etc. But these achievements do not make us happier in fact, except for a very short time, because then we osozaem that there are more and more expensive things. The result is essentially the pursuit of pusotoy. for zeros. Here Mr. Saatchi and saw this uncomplicated and simple mechanism by which you can offer air and be with confident! Because the buyer is, well and good, respectively, offer not difficult.
And indeed, the artists here are absolutely nothing to do with. What do you mean artists?
Oil painting (s)