Moscow gallery owner, began a lawsuit because of modern artists

[Черномашенцев Владимир]

Сообщение от vadim

I lost something at all.
In the picture, what is there?
And it still costs money.
I climbed to understand

This is blank verse? Or Hock from Hokkaido?

Recently, I walked with a friend of the museum. Suddenly, my friend began to laugh in front of a painting. It turned out he was delighted with the plaque that was made in Japanese style. Hock (or tank?), And only:

"Autumn. Semaphores.
     Canvas. Oil.
     Inv. 17346 "


The conversation is about a picture of Nyssa, GG "Autumn. Semaphores", 1932.

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от Chernomashentsev Vladimir

Suddenly, my friend began to laugh in front of a painting. It turned out he was delighted with the plaque that was made in Japanese style. Hock (or tank?), And only:

"Autumn. Semaphores.
Canvas. Oil.
Inv. 17346 "

I do not know something to laugh your friend, but you have to "plate" of such a text could not read. : D
This work is in the State Tretyakov Gallery Nyssa and there quite a different order of writing the text labels, and only "Inv. 17346"-just in any gate, I'm sorry. : shy:

[Тютчев]

Сообщение от Meister

is not surprising, because he has not once in the gallery saw more than 30 works by "old style and primitive" artist)))) and they with the ability to sell Tatintsian apart rather quickly! and, of course, expensive! ))

     I have seen these works, but honestly, I'm very sorry, I do not believe that out of only two remained unsold (at that time).
      I'm not sure if that is so, so once again sorry. It may be I am wrong.

[Черномашенцев Владимир]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzransky

I do not know something to laugh your friend, but you have to "plate" of such a text could not read.
This work is in the State Tretyakov Gallery Nyssa and there quite a different order of writing the text labels, and only "Inv. 17346"-just in any gate, I'm sorry.

Everything flows, everything changes.

This photo pictures Nyssa GG "Autumn. Semaphores", 1932.
This photo I have done in the State Tretyakov Gallery.
But the photo of this plaque with the above text - I'm not too lazy and photographed. For the size I have removed from their "Hoku" Figures 1932.

Or do you doubt that I could visit the Tretyakov Gallery?

[Vladimir]

To be easier to remember - this is a link to our photo essay from the exhibition Kondo http://forum.artinvestment.ru/showth...ghlight =????? The exhibition was launched luxury directory articles, photographs from the studio. Many esperimenty models have been documented. This cycle is quite an artist is not mine, but the approach - very professional.

[Тютчев]

The Moscow gallery settle disputes with New York

Moscow gallery Gary Tatintsian and New York Luhring Augustine Gallery settled their dispute out of court, reports The Art Newspaper.
Claim Gary Tatintsian Gallery pertaining to the transaction in 2,7 million dollars: Tatintsyan purchased from Luhring Augustine 12 paintings by George Condo (George Condo) at a discount of 30 percent (from 225 thousand dollars for a picture). In July 2008 he was made an advance of 1.35 million dollars. In the summer of 2009 Tatintsyan said that since not a single picture is not received and filed suit in the Supreme Court of the State of New York.

At Luhring Augustine, in turn, claimed that the buyer breached the terms of the contract - in particular, refused to accept the five paintings, arguing that they were sent late and wrong.

The conflict of the two galleries built in and around the work of Richard Prince and Christopher Voula: Tatintsyan claimed that he bought the work of the Prince of $ 2 million in exchange for the promise of discounts on now Voula. However, the latter in Moscow had not been delivered. New Yorkers have denied the fact of agreement. The total amount of the claim Tatintsian three million dollars.

Now The Art Newspaper says that Tatintsyan took all the work and refused to litigation. His lawyer said the lawsuit was necessary to achieve satisfactory for Tatintsian terms on which the dispute could be settled. Representatives of the Luhring Augustine, by contrast, called the trial a waste of time for both parties.

http://www.lenta.ru/news/2010/07/27/tatintsian/