Help with identification

[jurineo]

Dear Eugene,
because, as I noted above, my data is fairly scarce, I will not insist on the absence of consanguinity.

[observer]

Originally Posted by Eugene

What is interesting for the expert (Alec Wildenstein), you can write a few words ..? He represents the Foundation for the Study of heritage E. Manet, or is something else?
This collector's son Daniel Wildenstein?
-------------------------------------------------- -----

http://www.wildenstein-institute.fr/

Recognized worldwide structure for scrutiny of many works of French and some European artists, in particular - the French Impressionists.
If you want, for example, sell at a decent price occasionally found among the grandfather of Claude Monet painting of things without the need of this institution is indispensable.

In simple cases where, for example, is given a negative opinion on the price of photos from 150 to 250 euros.

[jurineo]

Originally Posted by observer

http://www.wildenstein-institute.fr/

Recognized worldwide structure for scrutiny of many works of French and some European artists, in particular - the French Impressionists.
If you want, for example, sell at a decent price occasionally found among the grandfather of Claude Monet painting of things without the need of this institution is indispensable.

Yes and no. Yes, and recognized, because it is not fashionable and very cheap, no - because I met (though not often) and frank lyapy from this office. In my opinion IMHO it still falls short of the pathos name "institute" because of their excessive financial orientation.
Sobsno I wish all this to say that in any case, their experience and opinions are always useful, though not perfect.

[Евгений]

Originally Posted by jurineo

met (though not often) and frank lyapy from this office

More specifically, can give an example?

[jurineo]

Originally Posted by Eugene

Specifically, can give an example?

Yes, of course, only pliz not today. Today, I have too "rough day" is issued, and here we need to seriously dug archives.

[observer]

Originally Posted by jurineo

Yes and no. Yes, and recognized, because it is not fashionable and very cheap, no - because I met (though not often) and frank lyapy from this office. In my opinion IMHO it still falls short of the pathos name "institute" because of their excessive financial guidance.

In this context, institutions and structures, synonyms, in another way - an institution. Reputation he deserved, its products are of high quality. Enough to see them released multi-volume union catalogs of major painters of the French Impressionists. Most of the employees highly skilled professionals. Atmosphere of good. Attitude to customers friendly, respectful. Unlike the other similar organizations.
As for blunders, then, as the French say, the risk of 0 does not exist. Have the right to make mistakes, but this organization in their times less than that of many others.

[Евгений]

Originally Posted by observer

enough to see them released multi-volume union catalogs of major painters of the French impressionist

By Edward Manet have a directory published by the fund?

[observer]

Originally Posted by Eugene

By Edward Manet have a directory published by the fund?

Denis ROUART, Daniel WILDENSTEIN, Manet. Catalogue raisonné.
Lausanne, Paris, La Bibliothèque des Arts, 1975.
Format 28 x 38 cm.
Tome I: Peintures, 308 p., 4 pl. couleurs, 430 fig. noir et blanc.
Tome II: Pastels, aquarelles et dessins, 277 p., 4 pl. couleurs, 679 fig. noir et blanc.

Paul JAMOT, Georges WILDENSTEIN, Manet. Catalogue critique.
Paris, Les Beaux-Arts, Édition d'études et de documents, collection «L'Art français», 1932.
2 volumes, format 24 x 32 cm.
Tome premier: 202 p., 546 numéros
Tome second: 487 phototypies en 220 pl. noir et blanc.

[Семен Семенович]

Originally Posted by jurineo

Here are photos of this "miracle"

It seems that this fragment. You could not photograph the side of the upper and right side?

[jurineo]

Originally Posted by Semen Semenovich

It seems that this fragment. You could not photograph the side of the upper and right side?

So far, at least until Friday, I can not do anything because the thing is returned to the owner. But the auctioneer promised on Friday to send more details and photos.
Concerning the fragment, then I doubt it - rather it's a bad picture. There's enough normally to be met all the proportions and perspective.