Carlos Khachatryan

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от zen

The last four in my collection.

Сообщение от zen

Thank you. Type of Smolensk, a diptych, here's the second part, and several other works.

I do not understand.
Yesterday read that all the pictures of Carlos Khachatryan presented here are from the collection of Chernomashentseva Vladimir. A user zen just in the present owner photographed them, and then bad, the "bar of soap.
We again thank zen and for showing works from his collection.
What's the situation?
Someone clarify?

Сообщение от Eugene

zen, Carlos Khachatryan, a talented artist, works great in your collection.

[Черномашенцев Владимир]

Eugene, to see the early work can only be in pictures, as they have long been distributed to museums and collections. And he paints slowly. In the 70 years he was interested in photorealism. Artist in early 2000. immigrate to Canada, but not taken root there. What I am very happy - Russia has become a good artist. Since the beginning of 2002-2003 domiciled in Russia - said that living here more pleasant than in Canada. Not to mention the demand for it as an artist.

[NATA NOVA]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzransky

What's the situation?
Someone clarify?

Cloned, probably ...

Сообщение от Chernomashentsev Vladimir

Eugene, to see early work can only be in pictures

And why Guugle no?

[Черномашенцев Владимир]

for K. Syzran:

Easy. Writes Zen, the four paintings are in his collection. More photos he received from the author. Includes photos and my pictures that I photographed myself once on the "shaving" and gave the artist files. Of course, that the artist has the right to enjoy the fruits of his labor - I just bought the original, but no copyright on the image. Because photos were handed over to Zen, which (aq) brewed (and?) This mess.

For NATA NOVA

Yes, he was interested in the 70 years photorealism, but now is not abusing the skill and the ability to write as in the photo. Naturally, the portrait is written largely from the many photos, but to not repeat, it is better to see my comments to portraits Khachatryan here:


http://forum.artinvestment.ru/showth...d=1#post496265

As was his "kitchen" I predict that the artist does not use projectors, computers and other printing equipment. It is easy to see on the original works. Some of them I saw on the job. He is a true artist. He got 60 years because he had not mastered the computer technology and promotes its work in the network. A Guugl - not a panacea. In the Internet a lot of junk.

Example of working with nature, see "View from my window." But this is not sketch, which are written very quickly. This picture, which made many changes, depending on the ideas of the artist.

Here's an example of work on the painting "Apple God. The left - a sketch, right - ready to work. I note that there were still preliminary sketches, cartoons.

[NATA NOVA]

Сообщение от Chernomashentsev Vladimir

In the 70 years he was interested in photorealism.

This immediately "from the first glance, be seen. Figure faint .. (but for this kind of realism, he does not want .., (IMHO)

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от Chernomashentsev Vladimir

In the Internet a lot of garbage.

As in the MoMA! : D

Сообщение от Chernomashentsev Vladimir

MoMA - The Museum of Modern Art, New-York.
Museum of Modern Art in New York has existed since 1929 and is a respected museum. He owns a lot of Europeans, early 20 century - Van Gogh, Monet, Picasso, Cezanne, Matisse, Munch ... However, the exposition is littered with very modern (and not so - the second half of the 20 century), Amer. "art", which is more napiminaet design at best. Classic Amer. - Warhol, Pollock, Mondrian, Rothko, Bacon ...

Before Carlos Khachatryan American far. He realized this and came back from Canada to Russia. : D

[NATA NOVA]

Сообщение от Chernomashentsev Vladimir

It's easy to see on the original works.

Dear, I have something just for the originals, and then judge ... (or you mean in the real?).
And so all can see .. You talking about? In pointless redundantly communicating interest NO! (sorry)

[color="# 666686"]Added after 8 minutes[/color]

Сообщение от Chernomashentsev Vladimir

Yes, he was interested in the 70 years photorealism, but now is not abusing the skill and the ability to write as in the photo. Naturally, the portrait is written largely from the many photos, but to not repeat, it is better to see my comments to portraits Khachatryan here:

And can this "seed pearl" isolate? What do you mean?
And how (and which) "skill" can be "misused"?
Mastery WHY? Mastery of working with "reference material" (photo)?

Shl: my son calls this style izsneny очено figuratively "saliva" (sorry) ..

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Chernomashentsev Vladimir, so that you clarify, Dear Commercial:
http://forum.artinvestment.ru/showpo...p;postcount=11

zen, and to you the same question.

[color="# 666686"]Added after 2 minutes[/color]

Сообщение от Chernomashentsev Vladimir

So he was on his "kitchen" I guarantee

100%guarantee gives only Gosstrakh. (c)

[Евгений]

Chernomashentsev Vladimir, Thank you for your comment, everything is clear.
Painting "Apple God" like.

[Черномашенцев Владимир]

Lord characters!

If you do not like Carlos Khachatryan ... Sorry, I'll write more accurately, if he calls you bad feelings, then why do you go to his subject?
Artists of many - in Moscow alone more than 1500 official members of the unions, not counting priveznnyh from all over Russia and CIS. And 10 percent of them quite talented. Find a better use. As one friend of mine his radio listeners: "Do not like it - turn off the radio."

And we will be delighted with the Zen creative Khachatryan. Few have seen it in the original, as in the current Rothko exhibition at the Tretyakov Gallery. Who apportionment - Carlos respected. Unlike Rothko.