Constantine Immortal

[uriart]

A good artist!
Not use paint instead of sperm, and feces, and paints in oils as well as many normal artists from different times and peoples!
And all this does not make it non-original!
Interesting way of writing.
Personally I am of his work have left no one indifferent. We gladly would have bought a pair of works.
What are the prices of his paintings?

[Евгений]

Сообщение от Ninni

Bio:

Again, not Russian .. this is bad, the Russian site should be in Russian ..
(PROMT) I should, and I automatically translate, but many who have not, will be inconvenient.
Sincerely Eugene.

[Ninni]

Сообщение от Eugene

Again, not Russian .. this is bad, the Russian site should be in Russian ..
(PROMT) I should, and I automatically translate, but many who have not, will be inconvenient.
Yours Eugene.

Dear Eugene,
It's better - than my poor translation. Of the 2 evils - choose the less

[color="# 666686"]Posted 15 minutes[/color]

Сообщение от uriart

A good artist!
Not use paint instead of sperm, and feces, and paints in oils as well as many normal artists from different times and peoples!
And all this does not make it non-original!
Interesting way of writing.
Personally I am of his work have left no one indifferent. We gladly would have bought a pair of works.
What are the prices of his paintings?

  2 years ago, he could buy from $ 1000 - 7000, now has increased $ 5000 - 30000. Look in a search engine Konstantin Bessmertny .
  I knew how - he works with two tubes:
1 --
Amelia Johnson Contemporary Gallery
g /f 6-10 Shin Hing Street
(off Hollywood Road)
Central, Hong Kong
  Tel: 852 2548 2286
  Email: info@ajc-art.com
Web: www.ameliajohnsoncontemporary.com

2 --
The Chelsea Gallery
Tanya Baxter
07961 360 407
Address:
436 Kings Road,
Chelsea,
London,
SW10 0LJ.
E-mail: Tanya@kingsroadgallery.com
Telephone: 44 (0) 20 7351 1367
Fax: 44 (0) 20 7351 7007
http://www.kingsroadartgallery.com

[antip]

It is useful to hear views on the content of works as diverse
directions and stiley.Vyrazitelnaya score presented here works Mrs. "Munk"!

[Ninni]

Сообщение от Munch

The subject of painting, I would call it one of the salon artists - all works show an idle pastime of representatives of certain sectors of society that must determine the audience of this artist. Extended proportions of figures, their angularity and "Violet"-pink-blue plaque attached to the gamma "finesse". But this is an artificial plaque, imitation, and not the content. Chairs from the artist do not look less important than the people whose faces devoid of emotion and personality, as well as the figures would be cut and placed in the interior like furniture. In my opinion, the artist looks at the characters a little down, but in view most of the works the opposite from the bottom up - that this dissonance is the only thing I can be regarded as a highlight. In general, the atmosphere of emotional impotence - may this is the main idea, but it is not exercised. Therefore, no more than yes.

A certain "Salon" is definitely there but this is the case when an artist is you can put in the plus and not minus.
  For art has absolutely no value what segment of society has chosen an artist for the study.
  Try to look at the pictures on another plane - for me the picture of Constantine is a very interesting addition to composite and planning decisions - and more "Gogol's" look at these characters - at the very same "segment of society." This creative smile author.
  "artificial plaque, imitation, and not the content" - you just voiced what characterizes a certain "social stratum" and the pictures are "artificial" very skillfully communicated.
   "To extend the proportions of figures, their angularity" - I think you do not expect from the actual proportions of art and natural plasticity - for this picture there.
  Chairs .... Some chairs now are valued slightly more expensive than some people ... ))))) But joking aside - the rich, artistic decoration of the interior objects - a nice decorative touch. As the figures and objects - create a harmonizing composition. Artist denies figures cheap, plastic and graceful focus is shifting to the superficiality and heartless characters, their teatralizovanost and pomposity.
  That's why I call it - Gogol look at art
Although I do not agree with your point of view - I sincerely thank you.

[antip]

Opponent, as Munch, and Ninni equally charming in their opinions
of the artist's work.

[Сергеич]

From the photographs it is difficult to assess the quality of the paintings and the artist on a serious level. Who bought the painting at auction, knows that after the selection of the catalog to look alive. And the lion's share of the impact of painting - it is energy. Sometimes it is transmitted and through the monitor. In these pictures I did not feel it.
In this case, all the pictures of the plot. In this and the plus and minus. Plus - you can explore the characters and inventing stories. Less that considered once you stop doing so. Eyes large have nothing to learn.

[antip]

And your observation is quite right ... . For that you will certainly grateful.

[Vladimir]

Сообщение от Munch, 35395

But it is an artificial plaque, imitation, and not the content. Chairs from the artist do not look less important than the people whose faces devoid of emotion and personality, as well as the figures would be cut and placed in the interior like furniture.

Munk - super. Heard. Words like music. But I think in the finals is not good enough curses to deliver a spectacular point

[Ninni]

Сообщение от Sergeyitch

From the photographs it is difficult to assess the quality of the paintings and the artist on a serious level. Who bought the painting at auction, knows that after the selection of the catalog to look alive. And the lion's share of the impact of painting - it is energy. Sometimes it is transmitted and through the monitor. In these pictures I did not feel it.
In this case, all the pictures of the plot. In this and the plus and minus. Plus - you can explore the characters and inventing stories. Less that considered once you stop doing so. Eyes large have nothing to learn.

  Undoubtedly. Pictures should always look in reality. Some artists win at the screen, some lose. Fully agree with you.
  I love figurative painting. Any picture - any style and content - can get bored and lose its impact - if ever before my eyes and look at it endlessly. Artwork should "go" and "return" and each time coming back - to take with a new story and fresh energy ...



  By the way, you can get acquainted with new pictures of Constantine and the data on the http://web.artprice.com

[color="# 666686"]Added after 19 minutes[/color]

Сообщение от Munch

Dear Ninni,
in fact our views seem to coincide. We just found ways to share sarcasm for the artist to the characters. The idea of "Gogol's eyes" - wonderful! Believe me, I do not mind, I just thought (I admit that it's just different shades of the same intent) that Gogol was more ruthless to their characters and portrayed them more grotesque. I believe that the softness in the displacements on the surface of someone's callousness, "especially if the" someone "- the target audience of the artist is certainly reasonable. But it is a commercial "reasonableness".

I think that you are completely right, and although he has a very tough work still can not presume to judge.
  It will be interesting to observe the turns of his work