Should I disclose the details of expertise?

[fross]

Сообщение от Eugene

I agree, good fellow, but here the situation is exactly the opposite advice was too late ...

Oh, and you people bezhitrostny Eugene. I explain again. Valuable kept in sight, but in peremezhku with useless and if a substantial amount of information, then handle it impractical and the information is better protected than if it put a separate and classify.

[Meister]

If you want a skilled forger can "make out" creativity "original" to the smallest pebble, and really draw so that not every superprofessionalny expert differences. In today's market a lot of serious fraud, it is gross, which is more or less experienced market participants see a kilometer away. A good forgery is not so much because it is very difficult to make a good thing, which theoretically could have ever painted by the artist. When information about the stylistic peculiarities of the artist will be available to the public, when people will know why this can not be original, the desire to forge an artist I feel lost. Because Aby some rough forgery not roll, but it must be good enough already that deal, so more and have at least some skill. I think it will help reduce the level of fraud on the market.

[Nik]

Сообщение от Meister

When information about the stylistic peculiarities of the artist will be available to the public, when people will know why this can not be original, the desire to forge an artist I feel lost.

Meister, and you do not admit that poddelschikam simply nowhere closely acquainted with the works of certain artists? They do not live their work, and buy the work for this purpose, they will not (the more you need to buy more than one job). Permanent exhibitions there. Catalogs may also not be. Well, and what they do next? They write on the photo likely. And the features of the style of the artist, as well as other details, they too may well not know.

It is one thing, when counterfeited Aivazovsky, about whom we know everything. And another - non-conformists.

[Meister]

Nik, oh, never mind))) is on the books who is not? ))) Optionally can be found on any artist information)) and a lot of catalogs, and books, this is not the Soviet era. voobshchem probably Selene law, a single point here is not found.

[Nik]

Сообщение от Meister

if you want you can find information on any artist

Oh, your mouth would ... In my experience, that this is not so. Very, very far from it.

[LCR]

Сообщение от Eugene

Read carefully what I write, and if the buyer and seller will combine their efforts to legalize falshaka? What will make Liana? "She works all the signs of authenticity Roginskaya described the photos, paintings, reverse side, seals, birochek laid out, the life story told ..
  You are right when the conversation is about such sums, fuckers usually fake pictures of this level are not engaged.
But so far only Lian collecting material for a union catalog of works Roginskaya .. but someone might get ahead of her adding there falshakov 100-200, with signs of authenticity rabot.Uchityvayte problems which have arisen at Lianas with relatives Roginskaya, and the situation that the other party may issue such a big catalog, Liana, I think understand what it ..

So, I have not seen this post, I think we need to give some clarification.
In March Roginsky show was canceled, because I really have problems with relatives.
However, these families managed to cancel the exhibition of my husband solely because of the effect of surprise, which they created, and the lack of a competent lawyer, who would have consulted us.

Since then, everything fell into place: under French law, which applies to heritage Roginsky (probably by Russia, too), a widower /widow of the artist is the exclusive right to exploit lifelong artistic heritage of the artist. This means that for the organization of exhibitions and publishing reproductions of works require the consent of the surviving spouse.
If it were not so, I in no case would not allow himself to speak about the upcoming opening of the exhibition Roginsky Moscow - is first and foremost ... "
Let's stop fantazmirovat, Eugene. There is no union catalog nobody, while I was alive, without my consent can not publish. Description Print USSR Ministry of Culture - yes, that's, of course, first-class, and most importantly, completely confidential information!

You have repeatedly expressed their opinions, lochevidno, there are other members of the forum, including myself, who do not share your views.

And finally, do mercy, did not tilt me and my situation in all positions. Do you have as much reason to believe that I was wrong, how much and for me - to believe that I'm right, maybe I have them and more because I know my situation is probably lichshe than strangers.

[Selene]

LCR, if I may, I will answer to your question posed to nowhere: in Russia the right to succeed is recognized, as in France. This site has an article "Author's share", just the right distance, or, as it is called, the right to equity in Russia. Only in Russia is right and by law and by will arise, and in France - only by law.

[color="# 666686"]Added after 3 minutes[/color]
Lord, I believe, the dispute still deadlocked. There is no single answer to the question of whether or not to widely inform the public simply can not give: (.

[fross]

Selene gave a comprehensive explanation why disclosure of details of expertise beneficial both for the buyer and the seller.
The question is whether the benefits of this more and those who work spoofs? I do not think that it will help them greatly improve the quality of the fakes, if you would very much like, and without us all be known. Well, if anyone of them and reach heights of excellence, and this agree considerable work, then you probably will not stop and wants to his own name was found.

[Selene]

I among others would like to emphasize that the sellers, intermediaries, not less buyers are interested in obtaining information, especially if any - professional market participants. Since they demand more.
Any fakes, whether food, clothing, shoes, money, antiques and fine art have different levels of performance. Some can be seen immediately, while others can be identified after the study without the use of special equipment, and others - only after special studies, sometimes very serious. Dissemination of information will reduce the turnover is just the most serious counterfeiting, trafficking in which it is possible just because of ignorance.
I believe that those who are serious "works" for a particular artist, has the necessary training and knowledge, and forgery was originally performed, so that with high probability to pass even a very difficult test. But this requires time, resources and talent of the artist.

[dedulya37]

: mad:

Сообщение от Selene

I think that those who are serious "works" for a particular artist, has the necessary training and knowledge, and forgery was originally performed, so that with high probability to pass even a very complex test. But this requires time, resources and talent of the artist.
     

Nonsense!
This is similar to Stozharov?