F. Sychkov? Etude

[Георгий345]

[QUOTE=uriart;3408541] Lot for myself usname@

Never too late to learn. If there will be many new, then share.

[Solovlad]

Good time colleagues.
Not in a hurry would completely eliminate the authorship F. Sychkov, although the signature is uncertain. Take a look at the sketches of the artist in this technique.
Here, too,is a mystery" unfinished painting, though not with a palette knife.
With HC.

[Георгий345]

The signature belonging to the author may be questionable, more noteworthy inscription on the reverse side .
Sorry for pull photos are terrible quality - its archive no:

[Romario]

I why are you under the corner of the picture?
distorted perception, uncomfortable to watch. especially if you ask for help in assessing the performance of

[Георгий345]

Сообщение от Romario

I why you angle photographed?
distorted perception, uncomfortable to watch. especially if you ask for help in the evaluation of

A rhetorical question or need to do it again?
If in the future, we took note.

[молевич]

Added after 46 seconds
I would say that this is the work of the Soviet period,niodin Russian classic would not be writing on this Board and signed clearly not native.Not to mention the weak painting,schools are not visible in the sketch.The inscription on the back made already torn cardboard.

[Георгий345]

Malevich, thanks. Now everything was falling into place. "The inscription ... on torn cardboard" put the bullet in the investigation.

[Eriksson]

Signature brand left. Does not conform to the rules of calligraphy of the late 19th - early 20th century. I even venture to suggest that the signature did a female hand.

[Георгий345]

[QUOTE=Eriksson;3411981]Signature brand leva@

It's obvious.