Please help to identify the author...

[Гриф]

Сообщение от nemo69

selected view points to another location author

Hmm... Did you hope that he is writing from life???
Wow...

[nemo69]

[QUOTE=Artoil-A;3375851]
But the author, in a hurry, mixed color rather in a single layer, making the use of dim.
I have this obyasnyau@

About the dullness of work, I'm afraid you're wrong.... it is rather time and absolutely improper storage of this work...
"But alas.... time stochelo percussion mechanism

[nemo69]

[QUOTE=Гриф;3375881]Hmm... Did you hope that he is writing from life???
Nothing sebe@

"The optimistic hopes, Joy elders served", But gradually fade away. And finally, on the slope of days Suddenly understands human Vain hopes, vain ideas... "some are not, and those far away"

But seriously, that is, I have some facts in favor of you voiced version....

[Мимопроходил]

Сообщение от nemo69

And you do you consider spelling of this work one of the students respected Yu Yu Clover...... Because it is clear (even to me the layman) that this picture has its own unique perspective.....
For example the picture of S. Platonov (another open me)... obviously has much in common with the famous work of Clover.... but the selected view points to another location by the author when writing....
Something like this.... sorry for sobornost speech

Your picture is a typical "wall", performed in the style then fashionable salon painting academician Julius von Clover. "Piers" closed voids between the Windows. Although the level of meet and good works, artists named "walls" did not write.
About the angles... All landscapes Clover fantazine, anything from nature, he did not write, the version with "other locations of the artist" dead-end, don't waste her time.
Workshop Clover have been dozens of artists, whose names history has left, and how much there was Bessmertnykh artists on podmalevka - not sure... And imitators was even more...
Do not worry - You have a good old work, will not spoil a specific interior, but collector value has not.
Good luck to everyone!

[Artoil-A]

Сообщение от nemo69

And you do you consider spelling of this work one of the students respected Yu Yu Clover...... Because it is clear (even to me the layman) that this picture has its own unique perspective.....
... but the selected view points to another location by the author when writing....
Something like this.... sorry for sobornost speech

You are mistaken. Installation of a composition is often a star, built at the intersection of Golden sections of the perimeter of the picture. The angle in this case is simulated. Did a picture of an experienced designer. This approach allows to mount on the picture box any images.
http://artoil-a.narod.ru/book007.htm

In our case, the aligning went about as well:

[Гриф]

[QUOTE=Artoil-A;3375931]You are mistaken. Installation of a composition is often a star, built at the intersection of Golden sections of the perimeter of the picture. The angle in this case is simulated. Did a picture of an experienced designer. This approach allows to mount on the picture box any images.
http://artoil-a.narod.ru/book007.htm

In our case, the aligning went about takie@


Sorry, but You allow some systemic error.
It is necessary not to impose the "classic" grid on the picture, and the pattern elements to build the grid and after to compare it with the classic versions.
Your ruling just shows that the author nakasaki, slightly shifting the window of the attic, for example, and other bright elements of the field of the cloth do not fall into the anchor point.

[Artoil-A]

[QUOTE=Гриф;3375941]Sorry, but You allow some systemic error.
It is necessary not to impose the "classic" grid on the picture, and the pattern elements to build the grid and after to compare it with the classic versions.
Your ruling just shows that the author nakasaki, slightly shifting the window of the attic, for example, and other bright elements of the field of the cloth do not fall into the hub tocci@

Not the ingress node, and the use of diagonals stars as tangential to the main optic masses or to the contours.
And anchor points just auxiliary delights....

From the point of view of mathematics, the path and the tangent to the contour point rigidly concatenated serif Golden sections of the sides of the perimeter of the picture.

And overlaying the grid on the picture - checking mechanisms mounting of the composition.
Estestvenno that the editing of the film is roughly based on the visual coherence of the image.

[Гриф]

[QUOTE="Artoil-A;3375981"]And anchor points just auxiliary izycki@


Yes no.
"Mesh" is nothing if the human brain can not looking at the object to build the geometry. Without logical connection of the device.
And to do it without the "nodal points" of our subconscious mind is not able to.
That's the focus. That picture of the sun on the subconscious.
Mona Lisa - presses.
Not in vain in the "rose of the world" D. A. she collapsed into the lower layers of hell.

[Artoil-A]

[QUOTE=Гриф;3376011]Yes no.
"Mesh" is nothing if the human brain can not looking at the object to build the geometry. Without logical connection of the device.
And to do it without the "nodal points" of our subconscious mind is not able to.
That's the focus. That picture of the sun on the subconscious.
Mona Lisa - presses.
Not in vain in the "rose of the world" D. A. she collapsed into the lower layers Ada@

Receiving, commercial painting and drawing. When working on the advertising pipeline, the use of mesh and reduced installation time image. Development, as a rule, signed in print by the customer (merchant) with the first presentation.
Perhaps this is a scientific justification. Similar techniques have been used for over 2000 years. Using a 12-beam grid I recorded about 350 years ago in C. Rose.

But to use anchor points I was not inclined never...

[Гриф]

Сообщение от Artoil-A

Using 12-beam grid I recorded about 500 years ago in C. Rose. .

I so thought that artists came to this intuitively. And great masters worked "grid" unconsciously. Then "middling" scratched turnip and pokulev paali, what's the matter, and began to do what You suspect.
But the wizard still sculpt mesh. But not simple, and complex. Petrov-Watkin, for example. With curved space, close to divinescheme.

And there happen to nonsense. Prodvinutyh people and subconscious advanced. And they build a "grid" of a high level. And normal boys, the subconscious is nothing on these key points are not builds.
And it turns out RACCORDI. "Highbrow" admire,and "people" does not perceive what the piece...

Now, actually, for this art and need...

PS Excuse me, but you, as a thought, why, this grid??? Just for fun? Well, Yes. D would be the time to spend... Grid brings real money: the audience feels it as something attractive. Why? The subconscious mind! But, we unconsciously see the lines.