The most significant artists of the twentieth century

[galatey]

Сообщение от Vladimir

Well then , I persuaded myself that the most znachtelny Russian artist - is Vrubel <! - ~ 1 ~ -> Who will propose other candidates ? It is better to agrumentatsiey .

Good day to all .
Vrubel and Ge . Everyone probably has their favorite artists, but is distinguished by a great master , in addition to the quality of execution of work , a strong emotional impact on viewers , the desire to look at work, think back to the good work ney.Prosto hudozhnika.Vydayuschiesya of a monologue , it is always a dialogue with the audience, involve him in " his story ." well, I think so ...

[Магнолия]

Сообщение от galatey; 2105701"

but is distinguished by a great master , in addition to the quality of execution of work , a strong emotional impact on viewers , the desire to look at work, think back to the good work ney.Prosto hudozhnika.Vydayuschiesya of a monologue , it is always a dialogue with the audience , involving him in " his story ." well, I think so ...

Good for you ! It seems right !
Add from the depths of the definitions of " monologue " and " dialogue." First - one of the works , the second - the achievement of the Truth and the Truth. Therefore, the hurt .

Added after 10 minutes

Сообщение от Laura; 2105851"

can interpret it as you like, anyone can create an image for a myth (although it is not even an image , as a regular geometric figure ).

IMHO Malevich , despite the availability of skills , yet pure and simple fraud . Not only did the idea to steal squares , and even earned it. But as a business man - a genius! That there should be air - sell (the idea of ​​the Cheka , is the air , anyway ). A thin value does not represent any of the Cheka , too, anyway

Perhaps the essay " To critics of philosophical " change your mind?
It can be read in my diary .

[artemirra]

Meister,
what you mean by the concept of "Significant"? if the criterion of the artist - the novelty of utterances, it is one thing. And if the artistic quality - both.
Because if in terms of novelty, here is easier to search the most significant work, but not very significant artist. And then it clearly - "Black Square" by Malevich, no matter how banal. And then in the conditional category "Paintings century. Because "art objects" - is "Fountain" Duchamp putting a urinal exhibit. Malevich makes the point in painting and Duchamp, opens a new era in completely different forms of artistic creativity.

[Meister]

artemirra, the question correctly ... but let's still be judged on originality, the innovation, because from an artistic point of view it was a lot of good artists, but many of them were just followers and imitators. However he did not spread to all art, because there are many other areas ...

[qwerty]

If we talk about art, then, in my opinion, Malevich is certainly the most significant artist of the twentieth century. Impressionism, cubism, expressionism, surrealism - the development of academic ideas, change the view of the image of reality. Malevich also launched a whole painting on a fundamentally new way, way irrelevance. All modern art in varying degrees based on the ideas of Malevich.

I really like Duchamp, but it is not art - the art of shocking.

[artemirra]

qwerty,
I, on the contrary, I do not like Duchamp, but I think that what he had to flip the view of the entire artistic process. It was after it emerged an idea of what is important is not itself a work of art, and the context in which it places the artist in which he treats the audience. He is the founder of conceptualism, if you like. A lot of the latest relevant for - there. Another thing is that yes - this is not art and not art, even in its classical sense ...

[Meister]

Then get whatever you can cram in conceptualism and call it art. Look what you excuse the expression, half-wit in Germany wants to make the exhibition a dying man (as has been the dog. Let me remind you, then this is an "artist" tied the dog in some sort of exhibition hall and all went and watched it die without water and food). And by the way, what is the Academy of Arts is supported. So conceptualism conceptualism, and all the better to retain the same common sense and do not call everything art.

[artemirra]

Meister,
I'm not saying that it was good. Or that me or you, or it must be like. I'm just stating a fact - so-called "actual" art based on the principle of novelty and outrageous statements. It should surprise and shock. Unfortunately more often it becomes not so much the brink of sanity, but simply humanity - first, this moron, who made sculptures out of human bodies (dead homeless people, if calling a spade a spade), then do-not-know-what-his name with a dog - and yes, he also received an award for it. That's the problem that all this art - award-winning and famous, and there was no alternative. Or I do not see her.
And yes, I understand, this is one of the principles of this art - anything can be called art. If an artist is so decided (

[Varvara]

I think we must draw the line between art - an object and a work of art. The form of the transfer of emotions distort an artist in the new century. It is very pleasant to reflect on the creativity of the now recognized by the creators of XX century, and called one - means slukavit. After a lot of interesting work, it makes sense from one year to get to them in different parts of the world to enjoy the beautiful.

[Nik]

I am afraid that the line between art object and a work of art to be extremely difficult. Anyway, to each her own. That's why there are different trends in art, and it's wonderful.

Сообщение от Varvara

It is therefore very pleased to reflect on the creativity of the now recognized by the creators of XX century, and called one - means slukavit.

Barbara, and you call her favorite artists. It is not the "most significant" and generally recognized as the most beloved and yours. They're for you and are most significant, is not it?