Aivazovsky. In the sea at dawn.

[redbor]

Сообщение от Nikolai Levenko

Aivazovsky work clearly does not belong.
Original paintings by Aivazovsky repeatedly exposed for sale.

That is, are you sure it's a fake?

But the authenticity of the painting, which was sold - was confirmed by someone?

[Николай Левенко]

Сообщение от redbor; 2921691"

But the authenticity of the painting, which was sold - was confirmed by someone ?

Specify a specific expert opinion I can not. Since I do not own this picture, and on the Internet itself is not vsrechal . But we can assume that passing such auctions like Sotheby's and Christie's , this work has gained the necessary papers .

[Беляш]

Сообщение от redbor

I can not say about the game fields and heat with cold,
 
but I know that this picture has an album Ivan Aivazovsky.
Large collection.
- Volume 2

In this book, 35 percent bullshit

[Николай Левенко]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzran ; 2920771"

Well, actually, not all, but only of " private meetings ."

Let me disagree with you , Cyril .
Albums now published very casually , looking at reproductions, there are questions to galleries . Cite two examples related to the work of Aivazovsky funds TG - compare black and white postcards , published before the revolution and contemporary images of this work , published in the album. This begs the question to the State Tretyakov Gallery , " Lord , where the originals ? "

[Артём]

Сообщение от Nikolai Levenko

Albums now published very casually

Maybe it baldeyut publishers?
I'm with my favorite A.Kiselevym same bad luck started.

Aivazovsky not there ...

[тутмос]

klassnaya rabota