Jeff Koons in the Garage. Star without a "star"

[Vladimir]

Сообщение от Konstantin

Vladimir, can be a bit more detail about the meeting. How many of people, who are these people?

I heard that a meeting had been registered about 300 people. Not counted, but the hall was full. The journalists, TV reporters, photographers and those who can be called vip-guests.

[Meister]

Vladimir, so you heard that Koons spoke about his work. Perhaps it will make a short summary?

[Vladimir]

Сообщение от Meister

Perhaps it will be able to make a short summary?

He did what he wanted, without regard to what this will say in polite company.

[Meister]

Сообщение от Vladimir

Do what you want, without regard to what this will say in polite company.

OK, understandable. and the power of his art, then?

[Vladimir]

Here's a funny article with a fun picture http://kommersant.ru/doc.aspx?DocsID=1142626
"Nimbus" Abramovich - is actually a modern-day round of the barbed wire (part of the product Adel Abessemeda).

[ВЯЧЕСЛАВ]

Сообщение от Vladimir

says Koons well and on the merits. This, incidentally, an important criterion when the artist is able to explain why and what he does without laminating and eyes, and feigned fog. If there is an intellectual component, found the idea, but you can not really explain - to the public and collectors is an occasion to reflect.

Why should an artist do something to explain ... When you're finished, the artist quietly step aside and not chattering like a magpie in his jacket, telling neophytes what he meant creating a product.

[LCR]

Сообщение от VYACHESLAV

Why did the artist do something to explain ... When you're finished, the artist quietly step aside and not chattering like a magpie in his jacket, telling neophytes what he meant by creating a work.

Absolutely correct. But this requires that he was engaged in art, and Koons and Kunst - two are incompatible

[Vladimir]

Сообщение от VYACHESLAV

When you're finished, the artist quietly step aside and not chattering like a magpie in his jacket, telling neophytes what he meant creating a product.

If an artist does not need a viewer does not need the feedback, it can be. But this is strange. One of the advantages of the acquisition of the Modern Art - the chance to direct dialogue with the artist. If he "stepped aside" or two words can not bind (see interviews with many young), it is reason to doubt the intellectual work done. Even if вешь turned out beautiful.

[color="# 666686"]Added after 5 minutes[/color]

Сообщение от LCR

But you need to he studied art, and Koons and Kunst - two things are incompatible

With some things it's time to accept. Koons is already in history. I noticed how much of it written monographs and published album.

[color="# 666686"]Posted 6 minutes[/color]

Сообщение от Meister

ok, understandable. and the power of his art, then?

For example, in the integrity of the technical realization of artistic conception.

[LCR]

Сообщение от Vladimir

  With some things it's time to accept. Koons is already in history. I noticed how much of it written monographs and published album.

If you step back, so Fortuny was also in history, and how.
Fifteen years ago, "history" was Sandro Kia, but where is he now? Here you, Volodya, you know this artist?

It is clear that in this nedokunsta invested a decent money, just will not let him fall. But let's continue this conversation in 15-20 years (if I live that long, but if not, necessarily fabricated himself some ectoplasm and send it from your response to demand, so that tremble)

[ВЯЧЕСЛАВ]

Сообщение от Vladimir

I noticed how much of it written monographs and published album.

Design is not taken into account when assessing the work.