N. Kravchenko

[наследник]

Сообщение от Mongolia 270395

but there are pictures that more 100let with this white canvas?.

There. On the dark canvases are caught "fuckers". And cracelures too.

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от Mongolia 270395

matures legitimate question to the professionals: and there are pictures that more 100let with this white canvas?.

After asking a question, you showed a piece of the picture discussed and looked at him a part of the edge of the canvas and a little bit without paint.
But most likely it is visible light soil. Apparently, the artist has used a primed canvas, the factory primer. In this case, the soil could not darken over time.
You're not talking about the color of the back side asking, according to the fragment shown you?

[natacha_m60]

Сообщение от heir

Please write the exact year - I could not see the last digit.
And. You may want to consider painting the background?

Unfortunately date bad read, either in 1918 or whether 1912, painting in the background, too, is not clearly visible

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Signature and date as a "drifting" ... What they suffered, I wonder?

[natacha_m60]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzransky

Signature and date such as "drifting" ... What they plotted interesting?

This picture from the site is visible here, too bad date

[наследник]

Сообщение от natacha_m60

whether 1918 is a 1912

You are not mistaken? - Where 19 ..? 18 ...

[natacha_m60]

I never dark, there is no such privychki.Data birth and death Kravchenko 1867-1941, so probably a 19 ...

[наследник]

natacha_m60, at your picture in the photo! I see 18 ...
You have the opportunity to consider the date in the magnifier. Take a look and tell me what you saw.
By the way, Kravchenko and in 20 years he painted portraits. That is, in 188 .. year.

[color="# 666686"]Posted 10 minutes[/color]

Сообщение от natacha_m60

so probably a 19 ...

That I can write - "probably." Since I-assumptions, and you must be facts that you can verify, having studied the subject at hand.

[Allena]

I am not an expert on creativity Kravchenko, but I think that the way to the painting under discussion differs from that in which the written work presented on the site. And swam signature is in doubt. In short, before you install the identity of the model, I would have doubted the attribution.

Perhaps, in Odessa, preserved his work, and Odessans better help in this case.

[natacha_m60]

Take a look and tell me what you saw.


Looked through a magnifying glass and saw in 1918