Landscape. Help in the attribution

[Toinen]

Сообщение от Alex_SG

Or 961 edinichka where it was lost over time

This writing is not worth it.



P.S.
On the other hand, you still had 904 messages and you like gibberish - Guru!

[Alex_SG]

Сообщение от Toinen

This writing is not worth it.


P.S. On the other hand, you still had 904 messages and you like gibberish - Guru !

What do you say ? Really? This is for you gurus measured by the number and the message Read More#, but for me it is secondary.
There was hard to see 901 or 961 , respectively, year or in 1901 or 1961 , and that this nonsense? Just do not write nonsense type for this is not important in 1901 or 1961 .

And that's what you have written, do not write worth it. Because , as I charge in pursuit of some sort of mythical points , and this is a pure lie ! If it is in your power can reset my counter on Communications and my thanks , though not so much , let your will add to it if you will warm the soul <! - ~ 1 ~ ->

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от Alex_SG

It is difficult to see, the 901 or 961, respectively, year or in 1901 or 1961, and that this nonsense?

1961 date of writing under consideration scenery can not be.

[Toinen]

Сообщение от Alex_SG

This is for you gurus measured by the number and the message Read More#

I think your ranking in other units, and to write, a year of writing may be shown pictures of 1961 - this is nonsense!

[Alex_SG]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzransky

1961 considered the date of writing the landscape can not be .

Thanks Cyril, I have carefully read the topic and how much understood , the work of the early twentieth and do not argue, just saying that seen bad. And on this , and you said that the author can not be Moses Spiridonov as at 1901 it was only 11 years old . It seems to me that you already know the answer to ownership, a share?

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от Alex_SG

... how much understood , the work of the early twentieth and do not argue, just saying that shows bad. And on this , and you said that the author can not be Moses Spiridonov as at 1901 it was only 11 years old .

I have not calculated the . I just saw a painting of one of the founders of the Chuvash professional fine art , Honored Artist of the Chuvash Autonomous Republic, Honored Artist of the RSFSR People's Artist of the Chuvash Autonomous Republic. He had not been able to draw .
  

Сообщение от Alex_SG

I think so, you already know the answer to ownership, a share?

This landscape is signed and the author is known - is one Mic . Spiridonov . But that's who he is , I do not know.

[Alex_SG]

Сообщение от Toinen

I think your ranking in other units , and to write , a year of writing may be shown pictures of 1961 - this is nonsense !

So, I realized what was happening . I did not write that year of the painting 1961
I just wrote a bad sign seen 901 or 961 , respectively, and an inscription of the year for example if it was added later would be 1961 . There's an inscription by the way numbers can be seen only three this fact can not be 901 years old .
I apologize if my inaccuracy led to the not so pleasant conversation.

[Toinen]

Сообщение от Alex_SG

I apologize if my inaccuracy led to a not so pleasant dialogue

Alex_SG, nothing personal!
Just makes me sick to look like a professional forum once turned into a big top, circus horse-drawn.

[Elrick]

gentlemen,

Thank you all for wanting to help. We will know that once there was a certain artist Mikhail Spiridonov , soulful follower Savrasova <! - ~ 1 ~ ->

Threat . Small Allahverdi . It seems to me that the most correct way to save some refinement of the professional forum - not to support non-professional or amateurish or just plain populist polemics. So far for an example not to go : if you just ignore it, let's say , trolling people type kamenskiy1967, then they eventually become uninteresting <! - ~ 1 ~ ->
Thank you.