"Ulanova as Maria," statuette, evaluation

[Артём]

Сообщение от Mihalich, 2537881

Judging by the silence

Mikhailovich, there are other things.

I do not know, because in such matters toe, but the figure is in good condition, what you see hair, so it will not be seen, only in macro shooting, do not forget the value of the object.
A year in the test side in 1937, take a look.

[Артём]

Сообщение от Mihalich, 2535801

Place the bottom of the whole photo, pliz.

Here's more.

[Артём]

Сообщение от Mihalich, 2535801

Place the bottom of the whole photo, pliz.

Here are more pictures.

[Solovlad]

Good night colleagues.
Agrees with the original subject of artemisinin, painting author-artist-ka (s) have the initials on E, are more likely to say that the subject of the pre-war, rare.
From SW.

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от Solovlad

painting author-artist-ka (s) have the initials O E

Here the author - Janson-Manizer Elena.

[Solovlad]

Yes, the author of the sculpture known - Manizer EA

As I understand it, the author painted a worst-to (CA) with the initials O E

From SW.

[Михалыч]

What can I say after these photos. Yes, perhaps nothing new. I'll ask just one more sharp in the macro picture of the part that stood out.

Well, about the painting can say one thing and the most important - Janson -Manizer of those sculptors who create objects do not require any decoration ( paintings). Sculpture she created in basis - bronze, that never rospisyvalis . And those that were created in china - and not rospisyvalis and remained in their underwear, because to the level of that of the sculptor - just language plastics. She made ​​sculptures , and not " nakomodniki ."
So again :
1. Option originality - Paintings ( Evgeny Oleynik ) is created on the personal initiative on the original figure.
2. Option bullshit - painting done under the authorship Oleynik E. perhaps the figure using the original cast bronze sculpture , which served as a model.

I will not say 100%no either. Give pliz photo.
In general, these controversies on the photo is not correct to attribute .
In what city figure?

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от Mihalich , 2538081"

Well, the ones that were created in china - and not rospisyvalis and remained in their underwear , because to the level of that of the sculptor - just language plastics.

The catalog GFZ see skupturu EA Janson -Manizer in painting : " Ballerina TM Vecheslova in the party in the ballet Esmeralda C. Pugni " Esmeralda " 1937 , overglaze polychrome painting, gilding, a . 40.5.

And LFZvskom ginger - some of its post-war sculpture in painting : " N. Anisimov of the Spanish dance" Panaderos "...", " Simon in the Spanish dance ... " , "Ballerina OV Lepeshinskaya in The party Cinderella ... ", " GF Solovyov Party Clown ... ", " GS Ulanova in the party of Tao- Hoa ... ", " GS Ulanova in the party Juliet ... " .

[Михалыч]

Thank you, I have these books >
The exceptions prove the rule.

Сообщение от Cyril Syzran

" Ballerina TM Vecheslova in the party in the ballet Esmeralda C. Pugni " Esmeralda "

And around this one in the painting - 3 in lingerie.

Сообщение от Cyril Syzran

" N. Anisimov in the Spanish dance" Panaderos "...", " Simon in the Spanish dance ... " , "Ballerina OV Lepeshinskaya Cinderella at the party ...", "GF Solovyov Party Clown ... ", " GS Ulanova in the party of Tao- Hoa ... ", " GS Ulanova in the party Juliet ... ".

And around these rospisannyh 6 - 24 in the laundry.

[Solovlad]

I agree with my colleague Mihalich that the classical version of the series, sculptures, clothes', but can not rule out that the figures rospisyvalis artists plant, although quite possible that could be a third-party, late Exercise.