Продано: G. Ustyugov - "childish summer"

[artcol]

Сообщение от bykinist

It's our character to it.

Remembered.
His exhibition in Samara was about 3 years ago.
Together with the photographer.
But such work was not there.
There were some (I thought) the commercial operation.

[Балагур]

Сообщение от bykinist

Sale :

Gennady Ustyugov childish summer, 2004 , 77 x 53 cm , oil on canvas /oil

Yes, there are still a wizard with extraordinary perception of the world , the desire to splash out on the canvas all the best and perfect! Looking at this work, I do not need more toned - as a look at the picture, and toned up ! A powerful thing !

[bykinist]

Сообщение от artcol

remembered. His exhibition in Samara was about 3 years ago . Together with the photographer. But such work was not there. There were some (I thought ) the commercial operation .

artcol, at Ustyugova - in principle - no commercial work (in a teleological sense) and can not be. Is an artist and a man of a plan - one of about 100-150 million.

[artcol]

Сообщение от bykinist

artcol, at Ustyugova - in principle - no commercial work (in a teleological sense) and can not be. Is an artist and a man of a plan - one of about 100-150 million .

Сообщение от artcol

( I thought) commercial work .

MB because of strange photos ... interspersed paintings ...

[bykinist]

Сообщение от artcol

MB due to odd photos ...
interspersed paintings ...

just a beautiful person.

[artcol]

Apparently this is really

Сообщение от bykinist

just a beautiful person.

on glamor photography made me cognitive dissonance.


In short, do not like the way the artist has been filed.
It was all too much, taking photos, especially with such.

[bykinist]

Сообщение от artcol

on glamor photography made ​​me cognitive dissonance.

In short , do not like the way the artist has been filed . It was all too much , taking photos, especially with such .

I would like to praise the contrary , " organizers" for this photo (the other has not seen) - as part of a commercial exhibition (if any) , it is quite appropriate . No vulgarity and obsession.

[artcol]

Сообщение от bykinist

I would like to praise the contrary , " organizers" for this photo (the other has not seen) - as part of a commercial exhibition (if any) , it is quite appropriate . No vulgarity and obsession .

bykinist, see:
1) The title of the exhibition , "I - the artist ." And someone says the opposite ? Unfortunate name . Fact.
2) The photo I have read it ( and the title reinforces this perception) , "I am an artist. Unrecognized. Tipo Van Gogh. Even just look exhausted. 's My work. Can be expensive. Buy . ". This is IMHO.

[bykinist]

Сообщение от artcol

bykinist, see:

1) The title of the exhibition, "I - the artist."
And someone says the opposite?
Unfortunate name.
Fact.

Personally, I think contralaterally.
Title extremely lapidary.
Name - super.

[artcol]

Сообщение от bykinist

I personally think contralaterally.
Title extremely lapidary.
Name - super.

So, always keep in mind my IMHO >