Question rated our auctions

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от Lev Reyner; 2383461"

I think it's fair , no %.

But I think it 's fair to%%, as it is the price fall of the hammer +%of AD and have the money for which the lot was for the new Owner.
The same opinion is shared by Sotheby's-Christie's, as I understand it , as they give the price of care to buyer's premium .

Сообщение от Lev Reyner; 2383461"

We say that Shishkin 55.2 million

"Russian Seasons" , you want to say? Aivazovsky care there ?

[Lev Reyner]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzran

But I think it 's fair to%%, as it is the price fall of the hammer +%of AD and have the money for which the lot was for the new Owner.
The same opinion is shared by Sotheby's-Christie's, as I understand it , as they give the price of care to buyer's premium .

I noted that in this case it does not matter. Let it be with%. Count with%, but all and not just for those who care to indicate the price %. Information must be objective. Especially on such a reputable site , which this information and specialized. Do you agree?

Сообщение от Cyril Syzran

" Russian Seasons" , you want to say? Aivazovsky care there ?

Yes , sorry. Something I'm all about Shishkin and about Shishkin >. Aivazovsky , of course! Shishkin why ? Apparently, the wait for the next season record of Shishkin >

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от Lev Reyner

agree?

I agree that it is necessary to specify the price of care to%%BP.

[John Preston]

And who knows what percentage is taken from BP deliverer "Office"?
Do they take the money for publishing things in the catalog as "Scoop"?

[Konstantin]

Сообщение от Lev Reyner

Count with%, but everyone, not just those who point out the price of care with%.
Information must be objective.

Thank you for your attention to our data.
Note pertinent now to fix that.

[Lev Reyner]

Сообщение от Konstantin

Thank you for your attention to our data . Note pertinent now to fix that .

Thanks for the material! Is not wrong , as you know someone who does nothing.
One last thing . Top-25 must be a top -25. If the two pictures showed identical results (for example, Grabar and Fechin ), they took the 2-3 places , and next to them should not be third in the ranking , and the 4th. Etc.

[Vladimir]

Сообщение от Lev Reyner; 2383931"

no mistakes , as you know the one who does not do anything .

Thanks for the idea. Made some adjustments to the rating. Places with the same strike price decided to divide (well, in the spirit of Kandinsky ). Was better. The fees too razrulili . In Kisling missing middle name, but everything else is spot > Well , let's hope .