Jan van Goyen (1596-1656)?

[Балагур]

Сообщение от Tyutchev

Thanks , now clear.

[color="#666686 " ]Added after 3 minutes[/color]



go here [/URL]. There, I wrote in detail about the technique of the painters of the 17th century. Of the writing is clear why no craquelure .

OK, agree. However, the picture presented by roman99 painting quite lame, even close up ruined - all spread out . Brushes were probably bad or someone tried their "skill" on the old board.

[Тютчев]

Сообщение от Balagur

OK, agree. However, the picture presented by roman99 painting quite lame, even close up ruined - all spread out . Brushes were probably bad or someone tried their "skill" on the old board .

 "Lame" and how! Jan van Goyen one of the titans of holland painting of the 17th century. Forge his work very difficult. But from the 19th century, there is interest from collectors to the Dutch , who were lost in the 18th and early 19th centuries. There was a demand - appeared falshaki . A tree for the job is very rewarding material . < - 6 ~ ~ ->

[Игорь Гурьев]

And more. How much can you tell from the photo , the sky is clumsily written , monotonous, coarse , primitive, mixing two or three colors and razbelivaniem their places.
The nature of the clouds do not pay attention .

Ie most suspicious in the picture - is an image of the sky.

Figurines and earth is just a very good idea to write , but as if sketched from somewhere ...

[Тютчев]

Сообщение от Igor Guryev

Ie most suspicious in the picture - is an image of the sky.

Sky - skate Jan van Goyen .

Added after 5 minutes

Сообщение от Igor Guryev

Figurines and earth is just a very good idea to write , but as if sketched from somewhere ...

" Figures ," he always clearly legible and accurately transferred to the movement , and even the characters . Always clear what is happening. Large Master !

[Балагур]

Сообщение от Igor Guryev

One more . How much can you tell from the photo , the sky is clumsily written , monotonous, coarse , primitive, mixing two or three colors and razbelivaniem their places.
The nature of the clouds do not pay attention .

Ie most suspicious in the picture - is an image of the sky.

Figurines and earth is just a very good idea to write , but as if sketched from somewhere ...

To the " figures and the earth" , let me disagree with you . All poorly written ... it can hardly be called a letter , it is - daub . I have a picture I would not buy a glance at her.
Sorry, that is dissonant with your opinion.

[Игорь Гурьев]

Сообщение от Balagur ; 2320241"

To the " figures and the earth" , let me disagree with you . All poorly written ... it can hardly be called a letter , it is - daub . I have a picture I would not buy a glance at her.
Sorry, that is dissonant with your opinion.

No, okay.
But did you remember the size of little things ?
She's tiny , in general.

[Балагур]

Сообщение от Igor Guryev

No, okay.
But did you remember the size of little things ?
She's tiny , in general .

Size: 30 x 25 cm! "tiny "? Now I start to stutter . At this size can be " dashing hussar squadron " with all the details and the details of fit ! Dutch and not on such a scale figured compositions wrote .