How to make money on the art, without extra costs - Страница 2 - Форум по искусству и инвестициям в искусство

Konstantin · 29.02.2012, 14:58

Цитата:

Сообщение от Samvel ; 2003721"

Why do I need funds

Well , the meaning is.
Alone , if you do not Abramovich can buy the painting for XXX money, and have been together for 1 and 2, and $ 10 million . The meaning of this , the fund has collected $ 20 million from 1000 , and bought five masterpieces. After 3-5 years, sold in ... tsat times more expensive here , and fat . And just when the option will not work instead of five masterpieces buy 1,000 fines .

Posted 3 minutes

Цитата:

Сообщение от Kirill Syzran ; 2003751 '

This is what funds? The local

And we have a really real?

Vladimir · 29.02.2012, 15:03

Цитата:

Сообщение от "Konstantin; 2003761 '

The meaning of this, the foundation has collected

Somehow, our funds shying away from interviews.
In theory - interesting.

Seriy · 29.02.2012, 15:05

Konstantin, but what about here recently, Mr. Bogdanov in his research report we cited examples that almost any picture from the auction a decade ago (?), Even millions, turned out to be profitable at times?
T e need not spend millions?

NATA NOVA · 29.02.2012, 15:07

Цитата:

Сообщение от Samvel

. Fell for it-at least 6.7 years ago.

She can advise and 6 years ago ..

..
on the site for housewives?

luxpresso.com

(I have not opened ..)

Konstantin · 29.02.2012, 15:09

Цитата:

Сообщение от Seriy

that almost every picture from the auction a decade ago

There is not such a context, because the pictures were taken with Christy, and not from the street and it has a good selection of contemporary artists.

Vladimir · 29.02.2012, 15:12

Цитата:

Сообщение от Konstantin

There is not such a context, because the pictures were taken with Christy, and not from the street and it has a good selection of contemporary artists.

The context is even worse.
Not just pictures taken with Christie, but only sold pictures of Christy.
And it sold just over 50%.
That is, there was even a double selection.

Самвел · 29.02.2012, 15:16

Цитата:

Сообщение от Konstantin; 2003761"

Well , the meaning is.
Alone , if you do not Abramovich can buy the painting for XXX money, and have been together for 1 and 2, and $ 10 million . The meaning of this , the fund has collected $ 20 million from 1000 , and bought five masterpieces. After 3-5 years, sold in ... tsat times more expensive here , and fat . And just when the option will not work instead of five masterpieces buy 1,000 fines .

Well, it turns out as a bank , put money in the bank and wait for profits to be more reliable than those funds . I thought we were just talking about individual people who make it, spinning , turning, looking , finds , and so on. The more experience , the more you earn .

artcol · 29.02.2012, 15:23

Цитата:

Сообщение от Samvel

Why not , why do I need funds, the organization, someone to untwist . What would make nothing of this is not necessary. You just study, study and study again . I think so .

It is possible , of course. Here and learn how you can, so to speak, to operate cool things. And where you find them? What to buy? Then organize a fund and ... <! - ~ 1 ~ ->

Цитата:

Сообщение от Cyril Syzran

This is what funds? Thence ?

Yes. Local do not know , something flashed like, not deepened in November .

Added after 1 minutes

Цитата:

Сообщение от Konstantin

And just when the option will not work instead of five masterpieces of stuff to buy in 1000.

One can imagine a situation when the trigger.
But we're on it further and further.

Added after 3 minutes

Цитата:

Сообщение от Samvel

The more experience, the more you earn.

Not only the experience is important.

Added after 7 minutes

Цитата:

Сообщение от Samvel

Well, it turns out as a bank , put money in the bank and wait for profits to be safer than in those funds .

So it turns out. A successful fund paying the dividend - will continue to work. Unsuccessful - burst. Only here the terms of investment , such that in the current situation is very invested in the amateur.

Artforboy · 29.02.2012, 20:14

Read the article and comments.
Guys, forgive, turned out rubbish.
This is not earning as solid spekulyanstvo ...)

Кирилл Сызранский · 29.02.2012, 20:22

Цитата:

Сообщение от Konstantin

And we have a really real?

I do not know why I'm asking.

Added after 2 minutes

Цитата:

Сообщение от Artforboy

This is not earning as solid spekulyanstvo

"Spekulyanstvo" and is "earning".

Buy to resell the more expensive benefit.

Or do you think it is not "earn"?

Making - this is just exhausting physical labor on the 20-degree frost?

29.02.2012, 15:05	Язык оригинала: Русский #13
Seriy Гуру Регистрация: 26.03.2009 Адрес: Москва-Киев Сообщений: 7,078 Спасибо: 4,985 Поблагодарили 6,613 раз(а) в 2,177 сообщениях Репутация: 12970	Konstantin, but what about here recently, Mr. Bogdanov in his research report we cited examples that almost any picture from the auction a decade ago (?), Even millions, turned out to be profitable at times? T e need not spend millions? __________________ художник Ixygon - http://artnow.ru/ru/gallery/3/9765/picture/0/0.html

Похожие темы
Тема	Автор	Разделы	Ответов	Последние сообщения
Help make out the signature	Бург	Costs, valuation, attribution	0	31.08.2010 20:34
The question of costs, the author is not known	mark4445	Costs, valuation, attribution	12	27.07.2010 18:51
Tell my how much it costs	римма	Costs, valuation, attribution	2	26.07.2010 10:46
Obrazok, tell me what it costs	John Preston	Costs and attribution of icons	10	13.07.2010 09:34
And contemporary art is now generally how much it costs?	moris	Costs, valuation, attribution	250	20.11.2009 17:35

29.02.2012, 20:14	Язык оригинала: Русский #19
Artforboy Пользователь Регистрация: 08.02.2012 Сообщений: 91 Спасибо: 71 Поблагодарили 52 раз(а) в 36 сообщениях Репутация: 104	Read the article and comments. Guys, forgive, turned out rubbish. This is not earning as solid spekulyanstvo ...)