Born November 11, Fyodor Dostoevsky

[sur]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzran ; 1842651"

" authors "? What the authors ?

Writers.

Сообщение от Cyril Syzran ; 1842651"

And from Dostoevsky , yes, you can get sick from his misanthropy , his Pharisaic piety, as for me, so just disgusting

Although we at the school and made ​​fun of the phrase " humanism Dostoevsky ' , though I do not see in it a single drop " chelovekonenavisnichestva and hypocrisy , "so deeply to see the human soul, as it saw Dostoevsky, can , in my opinion only truly orthodox writer .


Cyril, if the topic is not against it, we can continue it , just suggest not to write here my personal opinions, and to use quotations from various works of art. But now I do not write more here , because leaving the CHA for the opening of " dominant" . >

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от sur; 1842811"

writers .

Why mennie some writers?
I gave her .

Сообщение от sur; 1842811"

so deeply to see the human soul, as it saw Dostoevsky, can , in my opinion only truly orthodox writer .

Well, here I have the source : I absolutely do not understand the subject - " human soul " and even some religious preference writers I do not Inter, I confess .
I am far from these things , sorry . >

[Ika-Ika]

Moscow has recently opened subway station "Dostoevskaya" Its author, Ivan Nikolaev.Schitayu the artist and the work on the station, something close to genius, or genius, I do not know how to say it.
>

[Santa]

National taynovidets: Fyodor Dostoyevsky

November 11 marks the 190th anniversary birth of Fyodor Mikhailovich Dostoyevsky, the most widely read in the world of the Russian writer.


Chief spokesman Russianness both abroad and in Russia itself. Controversy about him being at the highest political level. Rogozin called him "master nation". And Chubais acknowledged in an "almost physical hatred for this man." Nietzsche wrote that Dostoevsky - the only psychologist from whom he could learn something. In literary Dostoevsky is the brightest representative of "reflexive" school: his characters are not subject to the logic of the narrative, come from the power of the writer and behave in the most paradoxical way.

Source "AN" - President of the Dostoevsky, professor, writer, poet, historian Igor Volgin.

Grateful demons

- Why do we still perceive the Dostoevsky museum as powdered dust of the classic, but as a writer acutely topical, perhaps our contemporary?

- It is also timeless, that is, existing for more than a century, the Russian question. Our Silver Age "suddenly" discovering the author of "The Idiot" as its aesthetic predecessor paved the way to the new art. The first Russian revolution finds itself in the revelations of his heroes, that's why Dmitry Merezhkovsky wrote of him: "Prophet of the Russian Revolution." The October Revolution and subsequent developments have raised to life tale of an old professor allegedly proposed the inscription on the monument, which is conceived to raise the Bolsheviks, "Fyodor Dostoevsky from grateful demons." This is a time not without some surprise finds in Dostoyevsky's own - mostly pretty ugly - features.

Читать дальше... 

I think it's not only a prophetic gift, understood as "pure" prediction. In the specific historical predictions Dostoevsky could be wrong. For example, speaking of the future connection of Catholicism and socialism or declaring that in the end "Constantinople is ours." The strength of his that he learned the depth of human nature, its hidden, including the "devils", the self-defeating and destructive potential. And people rightly notes Voland, little has changed - not that that ever since Dostoevsky, but even from the time of Christ. "Wide man, we ought to narrow down" - that in this "latitude" Dostoevskii see clearly before him hidden, "ultra" part of the spectrum, he - taynovidets our national mentality.

- What can we say about the change of political opinion, Dostoevsky (after replacing the death penalty at the conclusion), for which he was "bitten" by radical contemporaries? And did the writer thought that has rightly been condemned to penal servitude for a public reading of the letter to Gogol?

- Dostoevsky never been a revolutionary in the classical sense of the word. Case Petrashevists called a "process of intent" - and, mind you, most noble intentions were to liberate the peasants, to limit censorship, etc.
Dostoevsky was trying to "prompt" the evolutionary path of power, even in the fortress, in solitary confinement, when in his testimony, gently but firmly points to his superiors in favor of a liberalized regime. "The state is only defended by condemning us" - he would say later. Yes, but a measure of self-defense was clearly exceeded.

On the other hand, he was embroiled in a real conspiratorial venture - an attempt to organize an underground press. But this story - because of high family connections of individual defendants - has been virtually removed from the case. Perhaps Dostoevsky had in mind their utopian dreams, when he said: "We have condemned the Russian people." And again: "Up there, inflicted capital needed to bring me to prison, that I there learned something." Of course, this is not suicidal syndrome: the author of "Poor Folk" is not dreaming of the scaffold. But, I think, then it started to not meet his writing. He felt "slip" and subconsciously Was attracted "to change the fate", as it convicts. He needed a new biographical experience - the experience of suffering. Once, in jest, he said Vladimir Solovyov, that if he went to prison, because he made a "very beautiful and pure Christian." As for belief, not without reason because they are told - the idea of ​​change, but the heart is one thing.

Is not it time

- The highly popular belief, Dostoevsky - Writer fairly grim. But he had to achieve it in a humorous genre. Why did he leave it?

- Yes, he had never left! Take the "Village Stepanchikovo" or "Uncle's Dream" - is largely a comic novel. And in "The Possessed," with all the tragic conflicts of the novel - murders, suicides, fires - an abyss of absurdity, or, if you will, tragikomizma: Stepan Trofimovich Verkhovensky, governesses and ball, and the entire company, "our" ... A peerless master of his genius Lebyadkin grafomanskimi verse: "There Lived a cockroach - a cockroach from childhood. And then got a glass full of muhoedstva ... "By the way, all the poets oberiutov (early and Z, and Harms, and Oleynikov) came out - in a transformed, of course, as -" a greatcoat of "Captain Lebyadkin, this flawed," accident "aesthetic consciousness. Here you have the anticipation of the future of modernity. Yes, and "Brothers Karamazov" are imbued with the Socratic irony.

- Dostoevsky was a passionate man, a gambler, monoman. Whether those affected, obviously, the structural features of his personality at work?

- He was a person at risk. See: the age of 23, having no literary name, and no collateral, but the officer salaries, suddenly resigned, and sits down to write "Poor People." "And do not pristroyu novel, so maybe the Neva. I can not get over the death of my idee fixe ». And if not attached, if it were not for the overwhelming success? Of course, he monoman, bearing in mind his writing. And then, getting involved in "the missing plot", he runs the risk of freedom, and as it turns out, life.

After many years of absence, he dares to return to the literature - and how to get back! Did his first marriage - not the same risk? A man devoid of nobility, a recent convict, pulling in godforsaken Semipalatinsk tough army webbing - with a very conjectural view of the future. A second marriage? Twenty-five years difference: a young inexperienced girl, and destroy disease, oppressed with debts, with the very difficult nature of the writer. Of course, the risk of ... And so - ever. He wrote "The Idiot" and telling A. Maikov the "overarching objective" - ​​a way of positively beautiful man, adds, "ventured, as in roulette."

- It is believed that epilepsy is undermining the talent, and thus its owner is not quite adequate ...

- Maybe undermined, but there happened a miracle. Dostoevsky's work, despite the debilitating "sacred disease", is a crescendo. "The Brothers Karamazov," his latest novel, filled with extraordinary creative power. The author has marked in his notebooks: "The painful work. But the most important is your health is already a disease. And that ye may know in your health? "

- Did the Dostoevsky of the world, our world view, our historical destiny?

- Hard to say. On the one hand, influenced to a great extent. First of all the arts, in literature. His work for mankind - the most important act of self-discovery. "After Dostoyevsky's" we know more about yourself than ever before. But on the other hand, none of his warnings fell on deaf ears so that they can influence the world of social practices. But is not the same Christianity could radically change the world? Whether it is able to destroy all the terrible consequences of lack of love? As said, it seems, Akhmatova, Christianity in Russia is not preached. However, this applies to the rest of the world. So perhaps, while Dostoevsky's also yet to come.

http://www.newsland.ru/news/detail/id/820020/

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от Santa; 1842281"

To all of a scoundrel , a man accustomed to .

Сообщение от Guriev , Igor

This is not Dostoevsky. This Lermontov. ( The hero of " A Hero of Our Time" Maxim , more precisely ).

Fyodor Dostoevsky 's "Crime and Punishment" :

« Sonya Sweet , too, need - he went on , walking down the street and smiled sarcastically , - And this costs money cleanliness ... Hm! But Sonia , then, perhaps , today, and she obankrutitsya , because the same risk , hunting for deer ... Gold mining ... here they are , therefore, the beans tomorrow without my some money ... Ah yes Sonya! Which well, however, to have managed to dig up ! and enjoy ! That is because are the same ! And used . Wept , and are accustomed to. To all of a scoundrel , a man accustomed to !»

[Victor_art]

Boris Grebenshchikov - Dostoevsky (Omsk files)

[Ухтомский]

«Dream of a Ridiculous Man» (1992) - Cartoon by Alexander Petrov based on the same story, Fyodor Dostoyevsky.
Made in the technique of "painting on glass."

[zarajara]

Сообщение от Ika-Ika

Moscow has recently opened subway station "Dostoevskaya" Its author , Ivan Nikolaev.Schitayu the artist and the work on the station, something close to genius , or genius , I do not know how to say it . >

Wonderful work, this Florentine mosaic + painting ?

Posted 1 minute

Сообщение от Santa

National taynovidets : Fyodor Dostoyevsky


Source " AN " - President of the Dostoevsky , professor, writer , poet, historian Igor Volgin.


http://www.newsland.ru/news/detail/id/820020/

Interesting article , pick up a >

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от zarajara

Excellent work, this Florentine mosaic + painting?

A painting is not, it seems only a mosaic - marble and granite.

[tchaika]

Fyodor Dostoevsky in 1838 (ie 17 years), wrote to his elder brother: "I do not know whether subside when my melancholy ideas? Only one state, and given a lot of people: the atmosphere of his soul is from the merger of the sky to the earth, what kind of illegal child person, the law violated the spiritual nature ... It seems to me that our world - Purgatory heavenly spirits, otumanennyh sinful thought. I think the world has a negative value and of a high, graceful spirituality out satire. ... Awful! How cowardly man! Hamlet! Hamlet! When I remember these rough, wild speeches, which sounded numb groaning world, yet neither melancholy murmur or a reproach not squeeze my breast ... soul is so overwhelmed with grief that he is afraid to understand it, not to devour itself. "

And again: "The mind - the ability to only the material, the soul lives with the fact that whispers to her heart. Mind - only a tool or machine, driven by the fire of mind ... " "Philosophy is not necessary to assume a simple mathematical problem, where the unknown - the nature! .. Note that the poet in a fit of inspiration solves God, therefore, fulfills assignment philosophy. Hence the poetic rapture is delighted philosophy. Consequently, philosophy is the same poetry, only the highest degree of it! .. It's strange that you think in the spirit of the current philosophy: how stupid it was born in the systems intelligent flame tubes. "