Sotheby's top lots of the shows fall 2011

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от Konstantin

A picture of the 30's were sold with an estimate 50-60t. $ But that is not sold.

This level of things was not.
There were three or four some A30's and all.

Added after 9 minutes

Сообщение от Vladimir; 1813043"

just hard to imagine the motivation of the collector, acquiring his collection in a few insanely expensive strained faces.

And Andy Warhol portrait of Mao Zedong's okay to get in his collection ?
And the lower part naked lady sitting on a bust of Stalin?
A Jeff Koons paired with Chicholinoy
 >

[Vladimir]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzran ; 1813063"

And Andy Warhol portrait of Mao Zedong's okay to get in his collection ?
And the lower part naked lady sitting on a bust of Stalin?
A Jeff Koons paired with Chicholinoy

Absolutely normal, because these are portraits of famous people , not someone's grandmother. You know , this is the only option, when portraits of well- quoted >

[Konstantin]

Сообщение от Vladimir

because it is the portraits of famous people

And that's not enough, people should be in some sense - a cult.

[Vladimir]

Сообщение от Konstantin

And that's not enough, people should be in some sense - a cult.

Another stand out portraits of artists.
Let not the cult, but also sold well.
Probably take to frame the collection.

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от Vladimir

absolutely normal, because these are portraits of famous people, not someone's grandmother.

And what have the portraits?

This is according to your

Not here and not portraits, but rather too genre.

And if a portrait, a portrait of the time, a portrait of the era.

[Vladimir]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzran

And what have the pictures?

In Lentulov - not a portrait, of course.
But from the 11th message it somehow came about portraits of Stalin, Mao, Koons.

[Konstantin]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzran

portrait of the time, a portrait of the era.

And what's wrong with that landmark?
If you do not know that the portrait is written in the 30s is that?

I've now call "the Young" and that?
Or "Ford workers at the plant."
Where are the signs of the times and places?

[fabosch]

Сообщение от Konstantin

And what 's wrong with that landmark ? If you do not know that the portrait is written in the 30s is that ?
I've now call " the Young " and that ? Or " Ford workers at the plant ." Where are the signs of the times and places ?

I did not tell me. Signs of the times in a surly and a senseless concentration of persons. People like tuzhatsya (sorry for such a comparison ), and tuzhatsya something for nothing. There is in this kind of confusion , and this , in fact , the confusion of the artist , not the confusion of these people.
It's a bit more like the head of Filonovsky its expressiveness .
After all, the artist probably wanted the " best way ", and " how best " he can not , even cry. Not yet polachalos squeeze out the past and get completely new. This and the strain . He did not do satire , and a hymn to the working people . And it turned exactly what happened.
Not to recall the Troubetzkoy and his " behemoth on the dresser "

[Тихая Сапа]

Why Benoit later watercolors are lots of top (show them on as many as three) ...
Feshina (best) and have not brought Vereshchagin, limited video presentation.
Cho is a strange .....
It's unfortunate that you can not buy a Warhol piece by piece)))

[Konstantin]

Сообщение от Silent Sapa ; 1813483"

Feshina ( best ) and have not brought Vereshchagin

Explained that it was too big. I do not remember now, but Vereshchagin 4x5 or something.

Сообщение от Silent Sapa ; 1813483"

Why Benoit later watercolors are top -lots

These were not the top lots. During Russian Week will be sold to a collection of watercolors, the total amount of a million, I do not remember what, maybe pounds . Tomorrow I'll specify .