Rosokhrankultura eliminated, all on vacation

[Konstantin]

Not very clear about what writing russiaart. I asked our translator to connect to, thinking that Google does not make sense. It turned out not Google do with it, the meaning of messages difficult to read.

Сообщение от russiaart; 1742813"

№ 2
What happened to Rosokhrankultura and their publications "lost art"?
U.S. Security Department found that at least one of these publications were full of deceit and fraud.
Only one American auction house, complained that Mr. Petrakov, interim department head, intentionally made a false statement about the picture offered by auction in the U.S. as part of the scheme by extortion.

Who will take responsibility from Rosahrankultury about this?

№ 4
The auction house did not want a scandal, but fraudulent directory "lost art", which I know was the 4th directory - painting by Ivan Godlewski. "Missing pictures" were in fact sold to the French artist in the early '90s. Many of the paintings were actually written in France (including many species of Corsica) and have never been to Russia.
Many of the other papers offered or purchased French auctions. All products fabricated by one employee against another employee and his former partner, who won a court verdict against him in Superior Court in New York. You can check in online court decision on a $ 2 million for fraud and theft Vladimir Kaplunova in New York Courts (Courts of New York).

№ 6
You can find these things on the Internet, including the court's decision against Kaplunova for fraud and theft of art objects. The story of the artist Ivan Godlevsky is documented, as it was the most popular post-war Russian impressionist at auction in Europe in the 90s. Capons had been involved in these auctions, and used his knowledge to make this directory scam.
The fact that Rosokhrankultura published this directory, for me the big question.

№ 8
Capons posted this statement on its website igodlevsky.ru. Catalog - a complete fraud, and absolutely no documentation in the directory. Capons even said on his website that he knew who these pictures, and this person has a conclusion the court against him for theft and fraud in their art business.

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от Konstantin; 1742891"

turned out not Google do with it , the meaning of messages difficult to perceive .

I made ​​everything clear after posesheniya pages Stolen paintingssite about Godlevsky.
And if briefly, a kind of counterpart to work Karpunova Drouot auction got work Godlewski French period (and according to Karpunova took the widow "to" commission " of more than 300 works Godlewski , promising to publish a book and do the show ") , it is now in the U.S. with these work and , as I understood the power of this country just Karpunova Rosokhrankultura and charged with fraud .

[russiaart]

The paintings have been owned by Kaplunov's former business partner since the time they were conducting auctions in France. There has never been any claim made regarding these paintings and their ownership, (which is well documented) was not in dispute for over a decade. After a business dispute and lawsuit ended in a verdict against Vladimir Kaplunov for Fraud and theft, Kaplunov began to file a series of false claims against his former partner. Vladimir Kaplunov also has filed a statement claiming that he, Vladimir Kaplunov, was Mentally ill to avoid contractual obligations. This case kaplunov lost also. Kaplunov then tried to claim these same paintings as stolen from him in New York on his former website Godlevsky.com.

When none of these frauds worked he somehow managed to get Rosokhrankultura to publish this fraudulent claim, without any evidence or legal basis whatsoever. The widow of Godlevsky never made any legal claim regarding these paintings, and there is absolutely no legal documentation supporting this fraudulent claim.

Added after 0 seconds
The business dispute started in 2002 when Sothebys caught Vladimir Kaplunov selling a forged Russian painting under the company name. it was discovered that Kaplunov was also stealing paintings from the owner. in 2002 Kaplunov was actually selling Paintings By Ivan Godlevsky now listed Rosokhrankultura. Documentation that Kaplunov was selling in these paintings he now claims are missing can be found on the internet. Kaplunov also exported and sold paintings by other artists but apparently never paid the artists. he has tried to blame his former business partner, But the truth was all documented in the New York Courts many years ago that Kaplunov is a thief and frraud.

Rossokhrankultura knows that the paintings in the catalog were never missing and that the claims made by Vladimir Kaplunov are a fraud and extortion scheme against his former business partner. They also know that the paintings involved were either lawfully exported by the artist or they have never been in Russia at all. Rosokhrankultura is/was not a Court of law, and has/had no jurisdiction to assert a claim.

[Artem]

Сообщение от russiaart; 1742513"

What happened to Rosokhrankultura and their publication "missing painting?"

The U.S. Department of Homeland Security found that at least one of these publications was completely false and a fraud.

At least one American auction house, complained that Mr. Petrakov, Acting Head of Department, he knowingly made a false statement against the proposed painting at auction in the United States as part of the extortion scheme.

Who is responsible for Rosokhrankultura on these issues?

Specifically asked about this issue - there is the devil himself and break a leg. ... This story stretches for years. One thing I can say for sure, no criminal case does not publish Rosokhrankultura (Detective art) was a statement from the widow. It is for this reason, the picture is wanted, etc.

In my opinion, this should be handled lawyers more so if there is a court decision, etc.


This is not a catalog number 4, it is - a set of postcards. Paintings II Godlewski declared wanted by Rosokhrankultura /Attention, search! (A set of cards), St. Petersburg, 2008. From the site Rosokhrankultura.

Сообщение от Sima; 1742771"

Tell me, gentlemen, and the export permit was given out there? If so - where is now? If not, the issue is ...

Rosokhrankultura did not give permission for export.

Сообщение от russiaart; 1743051"

But the truth is all described in the New York courts many years ago that a thief and a forger Kaplunov.
.

Why is he free? >
-------
In short, shady business ...

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от Artem; 1743323"

Rosokhrankultura did not give permission for export .

Smuggled have taken a picture?
Then Rosokhrankultura should apply for yet another crime: it turned out that the territory of the Russian Federation was taken without permission Rosokhrankultura ku - paintings Godlewski .
Or gave no permission , and a certificate stating that allowed the export of not kn ? But such a statement also Rosokhrankultura issues at the request of the petitioner, and such documents will still come out with the outgoing № №, you can find the ends .

Added after 32 minutes

Сообщение от Artem; 1743323"

This is not a catalog number 4, it is - a set of postcards. Paintings II Godlewski declared wanted by Rosokhrankultura /Attention , search ! (a set of cards ), St. Petersburg, 2008 . From the site Rosokhrankultura .

In addition to images of paintings themselves , this site can be read and a very vague text:

Qualifying affair with the export of 334 paintings by Ivan Godlewski for
from Russia to the police. We alerts
All prospective buyers abroad and at home on faulty
the origin of the collection, from the hands of uplyvshey the artist's widow .
I do not want that the Russians could admire the bright paintings of Ivan
Godlewski only in albums and on postcards . They should be returned
rightful owner.
Once again I urge all art dealers and those who buy the items used
kusstva - be careful , do not trust a beautiful and believable
legends. Check purchased by you , referring to the Office for co-
retention of cultural values ​​Rosokhrankultura .

Added after 32 minutes

Сообщение от Artem; 1743323"

This is not a catalog number 4, it is - a set of postcards. Paintings II Godlewski declared wanted by Rosokhrankultura /Attention , search ! (a set of cards ), St. Petersburg, 2008 . From the site Rosokhrankultura .

In addition to images of paintings themselves , this site can be read and a very vague text:

Qualifying affair with the export of 334 paintings by Ivan Godlewski for
from Russia to the police. We alerts
All prospective buyers abroad and at home on faulty
the origin of the collection, from the hands of uplyvshey the artist's widow .
I do not want that the Russians could admire the bright paintings of Ivan
Godlewski only in albums and on postcards . They should be returned
rightful owner.
Once again I urge all art dealers and those who buy the items used
kusstva - be careful , do not trust a beautiful and believable
legends. Check purchased by you , referring to the Office for co-
retention of cultural values ​​Rosokhrankultura .

[russiaart]

The Collection of cards originally titled catalog #4 contain paintings exported to France by the artist ivan godlevsky himself around 1990, and other paintings painted by the artist while living in France. Many of the paintings in the catalog were offered for sale at auction in France in the 1990s More than 300 Ivan Godlevsky Paintings were Sold at Auction during this time. some paintings from catalog were sold at auction others remain in the possession of the owner. The United States Department of Homeland Security investigated the Claim by Rosokhrankultura made in 2008 (18 years after paintings were documented to be exported to France) and examined extensive documentation concluded the claim was a fraud without any basis at all. Paintings are in possession of lawful owner. Widow of Ivan godlevsky has never made any claim to paintings. Claim is fabricated by Vladimir Kaplunov, against former partner after Kaplunov was caught stealing and selling forgeries in 2002. All is documented in New York State Court, where paintings were located when Kaplunov was involved in the business of selling these same paintings now claimed as "missing". Rosokhrankultura is aware of fraud by Kaplunov, but now is disbanded

A much larger scandal for Rosokhrankultura and Kaplunov happened when Rosokhranktura illegally interfered with an American auction and and Viktor Petrakov was caught making false statements to the Auctionhouse and The United States Department of Homeland Security.

Vladimir Kaplunov explains it on his website igodlevsky.ru like this:

"In November 2008 has offered 21 paintings from her stolen collection to Texas auction Heritage. When artists have found out about it, they have notified Rosokhrankultura( the Federal oficce responsible for art stole from Russia) and have submitted declaration to Saint Petersburg Police Department. Criminal case has been opened. Paintings were withdrawn from Heritage auction sale, thanks to efforts of Rosokhrancultura."

What really happened is that Vladimir Kaplunov actually imported most of these Paintings to the United States himself as Part of a Russian art Business set up in New York with his business partner in 2000. Kaplunov saw paintings at auction and was already extorting and harassing former business partner who had judgment against Kaplunov for fraud and theft, so filed fraudulent claim. when Rosokhrankultura contacted Auction they were provided with documentation proving Kaplunov imported paintings and consigned paintings to a gallery in Florida. A contract signed by Vladimir Kaplunov acknowledging that the paintings were owned by the New York business was provided to Rosokhrankultura but Viktor Petrakov personally insisted that he had extensive written documentation proving the claims.
Department of homeland security and The Auctionhouse demanded documents But Rosokhpankultura did not provide them until after 6 months of demands that Rosokhrankultura provide evidence. 6 month after the auction Rosokhrankultura produced a package of documents, all produced by Vladimir Kaplunov in 2009 after the auction. all of the documents were pictures from the auction catalog all containing the same vague statement about paintings consigned sometime in 2000-2003 many statements were not signed by the artists or relatives as previously claimed by Petrakov, and even the widow of Ivan Godlevsky claimed that she was the owner of paintings by several artists. Many were stunned at the bold fraud and false statements of Viktor Petrakov, and Many in the United States State Department were made aware of the fraudulent claim.

These paintings imported for the business were mostly mid level contemporary Russian artists, all these artists know the truth and can confirm that Vladimir Kaplunov was the person who exported the paintings.

[Artem]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzran; 1743353"

smuggled have taken a picture?

Find the answers to these questions - always very difficult, especially when the known details ...

Сообщение от russiaart; 1743383"

Rosokhrankultura aware of the fraud Kaplunov, but now disbanded

I'm having some issues as you claim that the United States Department of Homeland Security investigated the claims made by Rosokhrankultura in 2008.
And then what? Typically, in such cases - the resolution of legal conflicts going on in different forms and so on What has been done ?...

1. This criminal case was opened in St. Petersburg. It's a fact

2.Pochemu no official documents? What you write. Where are they?: the court decision, etc.

3. How do you say that Kaplunov staged a criminal case - probably, and it really is, and it has been proved, and what do you do? (Participation in the Forum - Although also a good way) >

4. The fact that Rosokhrankultura disbanded, it's not something does not mean - all the correspondence and general documentation delivered to the archive of all organizational units, etc.

[russiaart]

=Artem;1743404]Find the answers to these questions - always very difficult, especially when the known details ...

I'm having some issues as you claim that the United States Department of Homeland Security investigated the claims made by Rosokhrankultura in 2008.
And then what? Typically, in such cases - the resolution of legal conflicts going on in different forms and so on What has been done ?...

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2010...ia-kleptocracy

1. This criminal case was opened in St. Petersburg. It's a fact

I do not know of any legal case in Russia regarding these paintings. Do you have any link or case information? Was the case started after the Catalog was published?

2.Pochemu no official documents? What you write. Where are they?: the court decision, etc.

http://iapps.courts.state.ny.us/webcivil/FCASMain case against Kaplunov -New York county 2003 - this is the same person he claims on igodlevsky.ru has stolen the paintings.