Pompidou, permanent exhibition

[Meister]

Futurists - a brilliant show, right? and the selection and design work? remember how sorry looked exhibition, which brought Pushkin ...

[fross]

Frankly, I'm delighted I came, but the exhibition of a representative - yes. Want to tease you a little bit on the theme of the exhibition at the Louvre, Picasso and Delacroix? The question was why should such a strange comparison, one lady said, "This is what would was first seen as bad, even compared with the second "

[Meister]

but what is it you do not like?

tease fail)) we're here all intellihentnye people)) I have not seen this exhibition, but was in "Picasso and Monet and Picasso and the old masters." First I generally liked, and the second I, frankly, more interesting were the old masters, particularly the El Greco. And Exhibition Nolde me more like ...

[fross]

Nolde, I did not see, unfortunately. Photo not? A Rouault could you see? I have not had time and now I do not know unfortunately or not.

[Meister]

Nolde is a directory, try to scan something ... Fantatistechkaya exhibition, in my opinion, simply the best that was in late November in Paris ... I always knew, but he has opened for me from an unexpected quarter.
You mean Rouault in the greenhouse or in a Pompidou? I 3 months ago in a Pompidou Rouault was there 4 the room was dedicated to him, mainly his clowns. Despite the seemingly cheerful subjects, they are fantastically emotional expressiveness, and much deeper than just clowns. I am definitely a Rouault became a different attitude after this exhibition.

[fross]

A catalog Rouault not? Scan, please, and Nolde, and Rouault! Very interesting.

[Meister]

Here, found on the Internet for rapid good work Rouault.

[qwerty]

Сообщение от Meister

the best that was in late November in Paris ...

And futurists are good, and Rouault with Nolde, but I was most struck by the later works of Picasso exhibition "Picasso and the old masters." I have never seen in such numbers of late Picasso, and there was simply amazed: maestro was 92 года (!!!), and this energy will not find anybody, even himself in his youth was much weaker. Moreover, many of these works, two or three dozen, and all the size meter and a half or two. How I regret not having bought the catalog, the exhibition was sold only French-speaking, for some reason I decided that I would find in English, but when he realized that there are none, turn to the exhibition has already lined up for hours.: (

[Meister]

qwerty, but El Greco he loses, agree?

[qwerty]

In my opinion they can not be compared. Two of the genius who lived in different times, with their views on the world. Painting is classroom and so-so. In this case it is really cool, just different. And then - a matter of taste. It is difficult to compare different styles: someone loves the old masters, someone - impressionism, someone - a non-objective painting. And how to tell who is better - Malevich or Munch? You can love someone more, someone less, but the rank geniuses, probably not worth it.