Help evaluate the picture

[fun_rus]

If this is true ...?
I am very much pleased ...

[vyadem]

fun_rus, so much so ... the price is clearly not 300 dollars

[Кирилл Сызранский]

I confess, I use glasses for reading, but it was a mole-rat myself until this moment did not hold.
Now, trying to picture uglyadet's theme is something even remotely capable of causing me a sense of dealing with that, I'm lost.
I have nothing in this copy is not spotted any in the "$ 300" or the "10000", nothing!

[Toinen]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzransky

Do I have a copy of this screen is not enough

Me too!
A promise to himself that the copy is better than the original, drove me into a stupor!
Throughout his life collecting the originals and as it turned out, in vain?

[kr555]

Сообщение от Toinen

Me too! A promise to himself that the copy is better than the original, drove me into a stupor! Throughout his life collecting the originals and as it turned out, in vain?

I like a man spoiled oriental art, I can say that very often the copy is better than the original. If it did more than a talented artist (and this happened very often, everything is always something to replicate, and often the student was a talented teacher).
To this picture is however not relevant, it is in my opinion no better than the original, but the work is still very pretty.

[vyadem]

if so is the truth, I am the original Sudkovskaya not particularly like.
But as they say the taste.

Yet kartnina 905 years.
Written well.
Need to know who the author.

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от Toinen

A promise to himself that the copy is better than the original, drove me into a stupor!

About it, I really do not say.
I think this applicant stebetsya just like always.
Well, he could not see on a copy of this famous Sudkovskaya clear water, that his trademark technique, which became even subject to litigation.
Or see?
I - no, no clear water in the foreground on the right I can not see not see the stones on the bottom, videm fine through the clear water of the original.

[Toinen]

Сообщение от kr555

is very often a copy is better than the original

I do not know what is better?
Copy - a copy!
And no matter how wonderful it is, it does not interest me.

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Tzhe not understand.

Сообщение от kr555; 1517483"

that is very often a copy is better than the original.

Can give an example of some.
So I imagine the situation: someone has a copy ... Well, I do not know ... "Boatmen" Repin. And who just want to understand this copyist says: "Viktorych-on, and you have a better picture of something ..." My colleague, the viewer, critic, art critic, who? The buyer of the copy?

[artcol]

Or so (p. .. hmm ... podkovyrkoy ):

Сообщение от Cyril Syzransky

"Viktorych-on, and you IT picture of something better to get ..."