Dreams Matthew Weisberg

[Art-lover]

Very pleased that the work of this wonderful artist here was appreciated. Beginning with his first show, he always pleases me. Weisberg love for the great letter, because he is one of the few in the Kiev-minded artists (although it is widely believed that the brains for painters - a luxury) for their ability without vulgarity touch to the universal problems, because he knows how to express the subtlety of human emotions - especially such a dimension of love, tenderness. The latter leads to regret that he did not feel themselves in the children's schedule. (Which would be a curious contrast to Gapchinskaya ).

But I have one tooth on Matthew: peering into the abyss of the universe, it remains too "chamber", too lyrical to explore their dark depths to the bottom (the "human, all too human ..."). I do believe, however, that he has untapped potential. And looked forward to his new show: when he finally made the plunge and will find that the monumentality and strength that will not call him an artist of advances outstanding.

As for the price of his work - I think that it is undervalued in the Ukraine. Maybe he is too refined for the prevailing regional market tastes.

Here is the address of his site: www.mvaisberg.com. Enjoy.

[Yaya]

I also love creativity of this remarkable artist.
I think Matthew is really outstanding.
I was invited to the opening, but I got sick and, alas, failed.
True, most of the work I've seen live.
It is a pity that the photo does not convey the beauty and depth of the pictures Matthew.

[SAH]

Сообщение от Art-lover

As for prices of MV - I think that it is undervalued in the Ukraine. Maybe he is too refined for the prevailing regional market tastes.

Also think so. Special thanks I want to say artinvestment who posted the news about the event here http://artinvestment.ru/news/exhibit...eberg_ukr.html

[Станиславский]

Сообщение от Art-lover

But I have one tooth on Matthew: peering into the abyss of the universe, it remains too "chamber", too lyrical to explore their dark depths to the bottom (the "human, all too human ...")...
... Sic: it is our reality, not its transcendence. For all the narrative metaphysics Weisberg, in his paintings do not feel that transcendence, which emanates from, say, metaphysical de Chirico painting.

And here, with all due respect, I can not agree. Mitya for the "inhuman", supramarginal exactly where it takes the form of ordinary and human, pointing us to the point of contact between the worlds. Here, for example, a few illustrations for "Devils," Dostoevsky:

[fabosch]

Сообщение от Art-lover

The latter makes the regret that he did not feel themselves in the children's schedule. (Which would be a curious contrast to Gapchinskaya ).

I, for some reason it seems that the children's book chart - not exactly his area. Although this artist is fraught with such deep, often, any predictions ...

Сообщение от Art-lover

With all the narrative metaphysics Weisberg, in his paintings do not feel that transcendence, which emanates from, say, metaphysical painting of de Chirico. (However, this essential for me, "Sur" is the moment, most viewers will probably imperceptible).

Apparently, I belong to this majority, who prefer the metaphysical narrative only, not clearly articulated character. Moreover, this is what I like in his work - the lack of sur-aesthetics (which, I confess, did not like), creating a sense of depth and meditative pure plastic means. However, all's not hard to please

Сообщение от Art-lover

Here is the address of his site: www.mvaisberg.com. Enjoy.

Frankly, the site gives the impression of neglect. It does not even have reports of current exhibitions. And here, I thought, work and more are the most recent
http://picasaweb.google.com/msvaisberg

[Art-lover]

Seychas looked vaysbergovsky site: in fact the last small difference is dated 2005. It is a pity, feed better there than on WebPicassa.

Сообщение от Stanislavsky, 1410311

Mitya for the" inhuman ", supramarginal exactly where it takes the form of ordinary and human, pointing us to the point of contact between the worlds.

In clarifying his perception Weisberg venture to draw a parallel with Rembrandt, also Rained mystical light on the ordinary and everyday: respect for genuine talent requires Hamburg account.) Touching the other in the same area, but the effects are slightly different. So it seems to me.

Сообщение от fabosch

I guess I feel about this most preferring metaphysics exclusively narrative is not explicitly articulated character. Moreover, this is what I like in his work - the lack of sur-aesthetics (which, I confess, did not like), creating a sense of depth and meditative pure plastic means. However, all's not hard to please

Weisberg describes his style as a scientist, monologichny and polysyllabic, speaking of the narrative (narrative), I podrumeval this feature. But I understand you correctly), and it is in solidarity about the role of plastics. C syurom "I have my own disassembly (b.ch. buried in the subject Surrealism), which suggests that L. Da Vinci, and Rembrandt to Dali's surreal two heads, and those lines of fantasy, which in common parlance taken hold in the Department of Sur- aesthetics, have no relation to it more than social realism. I hope you understand me now.

[fabosch]

Сообщение от Art-lover

C syurom "I have my own disassembly (b.ch. buried in the subject of Surrealism), which suggests that L. Da Vinci, and Rembrandt to Dali's surreal two heads, and those lines of fantasy, which in common parlance taken hold in the Department of Sur-aesthetics, have no relation to it more than social realism. I hope you understand me now.

If you're referring to the theoretical aesthetics of surrealism, proclaiming to show "sverhvidimoe" behind the simple, everyday reality, then this is the goal of virtually all art in general, and in this sense that Weisberg is quite surreal, because the show is not heaven, more accurately, not only the sky, and quite a plastic element, on its power is quite comparable with the image of the sky in our minds. But in addition to theory there is a particular practice of surrealism, often reduced to a flat and trivial allegory, or even just a nonsense, especially in the works of infinite and malotalantlivyh "followers". This is what causes some on edge

[Art-lover]

Сообщение от fabosch

If you mean the theoretical aesthetics of surrealism, proclaiming to show" sverhvidimoe "behind the simple, everyday reality, then this is the goal of virtually all art in general, and in this sense that Weisberg is quite surreal, as shown does not the sky, or more precisely not only the sky, and quite a plastic element, on its power is quite comparable with the image of the sky in our minds. But in addition to theory there is a particular practice of surrealism, often reduced to a flat and trivial allegory, or even just a nonsense, especially in the works of infinite and malotalantlivyh "followers". This is what causes some teeth on edge

C happy to quote your post, because ready to sign it with every word. Indeed, the aesthetics of surrealism were neither original nor integrity. If we do not encourage monopolistic claims Breton, one would say that the aesthetics - a ghost caught in bondage to the art critics. Great artists never needs to intensify the exploitation of the particles "sur-", "over-", "trans" and so on. to go beyond, to transgress the boundaries and look into the abyss - they just did it. Former boom around these boxes reflected coincidence of interests of analysts writing fraternity, artists, imitators, and the public with not very developed taste.
"Concrete practices" of surrealism was just as much as "surrealist", and the mass circulation in the outcome of sur is not merely caused nauseam, but translated word "surrealist" in the obscene vocabulary. And yet I was not feeling that the fate of the term "surrealism" there was not quite true: in other historical layout of it could be more prosecutors.
In general, down with the Surrealists, long live the surreal.

[Allena]

From the heart I hope that this wonderful conversation, especially the part about actually Weisberg, read in the gallery, "Ducat".
At least for the future.
And if you do not read, then maybe someone would help them?

[манна]

Сообщение от SAH

Well, not so rustic, the picture of the cycle which is called "Heaven." I really like having the work of this particular cycle "On the monitor can not see the depth and subtlety of color on his canvases, a living naamnogo better. They (the paintings) such that I long to see them.

Liked best.

Stanislavsky, SAH, thank you. Artist cool!