Продам: Selling now Oleg Tselkov

[Маруся]

Сообщение от FAIv

and then lived in Moscow for the artist's sister, Lina, and he Oleg quite a cheerful, nothing prevents consult.

So you consult, where he rope on boutonniere zakmenil? Maybe this is a new stage in creativity?

[Тютчев]

Сообщение от Maroussia

So you consult, where he replaced the rope on the boutonniere? Maybe this is a new stage in creativity?

Maroussia, is not buttonhole, and a pot of flower. This durilka was made with this work Tsalkova "Portrait of a flower." (1962, oil on canvas, plywood 75h60) from the collection of Boris Zaborova.

[Маруся]

Although Tyutchev pot and does not smell, rather, what you tried to convince me in a conversation about Krasnopevtsev: smiley in the form of a smiling George Washington. I remember.

[OlegTsi]

Tjutchev, if you can, find the original photo and put together with forgery in the subject Fakes ... fake ... It will be clear and useful.

[ФАИв]

Maroussia, Why should I consult it, let the buyer worries
And then, on the photo of this quality - a copy of the original can be understood with ооочень great difficulty, to put it mildly. Although we have clairvoyants and all of them know

[Тютчев]

Сообщение от FAIv

Maroussia, Why should I consult it, let the buyer worries
And then, on the photo of this quality - a copy of the original can be understood with ооочень great difficulty, to put it mildly. Although we have clairvoyants and all of them know

Leaving aside the lyrics, then you think that this picture has a chance? You want to give advice to the buyer to go to Lina, turn to Oleg, but in any case not to trust the opinion of "seer"?

 Tell me, dear, you call into question all of my statements regarding the authenticity made at this forum, or just this incident made you speak of me with irony?

[ФАИв]

Tjutchev, my dear, do not meddle in the bottle.

See chronology of posts. For example your Post 6 contradicts post 12.Otritsaete that work falls within the 60-m, and then tell that falshak made to work 62-th year. M. B. misprint ?

If you saw this thing and the original, I have no reason to argue with you, your approval, you have it and protect it. I, for example, when talked about falshake Krasnopevtsev at Sotheby's, this falshak in his hands he held what actually put the public in popularity .

With regard to the inscription on the back, ready to repeat that the signature is similar to the signature Tsalkova Oleg Nikolayevich, so far as can be seen in photos posted on the forum.

As for irony, believe me, nothing personal against you. General remark. I do not like categorical judgments: "bullshit", "falshak" on photos exposed on the forum, with the exception of proven and hard-won personal judgments about familiar things.

Sincerely.
Faiv

[Тютчев]

Сообщение от FAIv

Tjutchev, my dear, do not meddle in the bottle.

See chronology of posts. For example your Post 6 contradicts post 12.Otritsaete that work falls within the 60-m, and then tell that falshak made to work 62-th year. M. B. misprint ?

If you saw this thing and the original, I have no reason to argue with you, your approval, you have it and protect it. I, for example, when talked about falshake Krasnopevtsev at Sotheby's, this falshak in his hands he held what actually put the public in popularity .

With regard to the inscription on the back, ready to repeat that the signature is similar to the signature Tsalkova Oleg Nikolayevich, so far as can be seen in photos posted on the forum.

As for irony, believe me, nothing personal against you. General remark. I do not like categorical judgments: "bullshit", "falshak" on photos exposed on the forum, with the exception of proven and hard-won personal judgments about familiar things.

Sincerely.
Faiv

FAIv, believe me I am calm.
 
No contradictions, I do not see. Everyone knows that Tselkov 60-ies. stronger, and late (90-ies.-2000-ies.) - is weaker. Therefore, the first impression that made on me a picture, and found its expression in words, that is - not Tselkov 60's. As a minimum. Analyzing further, I came to the conclusion that it is not Tselkov altogether. Ie my words reflect the course of my thoughts. And they have a certain logic.
 
     Talking about "clairvoyants", it seemed to me that you clearly hinting at me (in this thread except me nobody made categorical statements). That's why I asked you to speak more clearly, in order to understand, you are saying it for the sake of "witty", or you have a good reason? The fact that some on this forum, unfortunately, there is a long tradition - to make statements, for which costs nothing. And then, what is strange is that other person asked for clarification? I am glad that talking about "clairvoyants" You did not tell me exactly, but believe me, that my dogmatism is not unwarranted. If I say that the thing is not true, then the fact there are serious grounds, and I am absolutely sure. In that case, if I am not sure or do not know the subject, I usually do not speak at all. I assure you, sometimes photos just ... What can I do if I see? Do not trust themselves or remain silent out of modesty?
 
No less sincerely, your Tjutchev.

[ФАИв]

All right. Modesty, a direct path to obscurity!

As assessments "strong - weak" I am sure there is a half-dozen collectors who compete with you , since scored late Tsalkova .
Yes, and Oleg his early work is not a fan of

And yet, for me remains a mystery: How to inferior picture, you can judge - a successful picture or not, "flat", etc. Not having this, as in your case, sure that before you falshak.
It is known that in the pictures so much depends on the angle, lighting, color .....

[Iren1974]

Here, simply, to be compared and the fact that in the face. Even not argue about anything!