Mark Rothko

[redbor]

Сообщение от Konstantin; 2290821"

...

Strange logic, it is evident and clear to everyone, for some reason it is not necessary to unwind, let sold for next to nothing (well, everything is relative of course)?
  Can not answer because you do not have an answer. Repeat the pattern of "take and unwind" anyone anyhow to at least 20 000 0000 $ you obviously can not.

 You do not understand: I think Aivazovsky has reached its price and many times will not grow. The user can compare his work with that of, for example, Lagorio, Sudkovsky and so on ...
 Well, for example, there is the price of gold, and you know it will not be much more expensive to buy gold price set for today.
 But if we see that one trader sold the metal is unknown to us at one price, and he sold it in three more, it will give us confidence. that you have to buy the metal, even though we do not know what it is and why you need
 How to compare which is better written: Malevich square or yellow center Rothko?

Сообщение от Konstantin;"

repeat pattern of "take and unwind" anyone anyhow to at least 20 000 0000 $ you obviously can not

Of course I can not, there's no one to cope, it's a process. I was not a trader, and a simple user painting.
 Promotion are recognized experts in their field, and I have no doubt that in the near future of the next abstractionist thunder as "innovation and space jump". So prices accordingly.

[Konstantin]

Сообщение от redbor; 2296111"

I think Aivazovsky has reached its price and many times will not increase .

I think that prices will fall even .

Сообщение от redbor; 2296111"

in the near future of the next abstractionist thunder as "innovation and space jump

Why by the way, just because it is easy to cheat on the novelty ? But the young are no longer young, abstract art , thank God for decades . And most importantly - why Rothko ? By your logic take any and forth to millions , or still not any?
And if not any , then it is at least a reason to study the phenomenon. And the fact that the success of Rothko's phenomenon is a fact.

[Seriy]

redbor, well, is booming, Gerhard Richter-living artist, and the pictures - there are tens of millions, but 20 years ago was worth a measly thousand euros.

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от Seriy; 2296531"

Gerhard Richter-living artist, and the pictures - there are tens of millions

Things Rothko also already during his lifetime were worth a lot of money by the then standards.
Another thing that things Rothko in the market is not so much - main important part of the heritage is still in museums, the Washington National Gallery of Art, for example - there is a gift of Christopher Rothko and Kate has more than 1,000

Gift of The Mark Rothko Foundation, Inc.

, all, in general, is its main scenic 50-60 years things are there.
And the other collectors, knowing that Rothko thought of doing things lots and lots of them exhibit the same, just trying to gather some of the series and it works: in the garage two and a half years ago, was brought and exhibited in a specially built visiting Canadian architect Jamie Fobert black room is a series of 13 paintings from one private collection, which present "an unnamed owner" Ezra Merkin bought for $ 320 million, apparently realizing that the art market seodnya Mark Rothko - synonymous with financial success and fantastcheskogo invstitsionnogo potential.

Well, about " understand Rothko " ...
 Tarkovsky once said that art can not be understood - the art is to feel.
Understanding - is suited to science, not an art.
Rothko many fond and in museums, where it hangs, is always full of people.
And as the Cheka discuss or sravnivat ...
CHK is, in my opinion, today, and not a work of art, and the concept. It is not necessarily something to watch, just know that it exists.
But you can see it in the Tretyakov Gallery in the CHA, there is useful especially in the days to come Antique Salon ...

[Seriy]

why Rothko phenomenon? artist as an artist. Is expensive ? and who from the AAE American abstract expressionists first line is cheap ?
Many of them even easier for technical execution , Motherwell , for example.

Another thing is that since the 1920s, Russia dropped out of the total hudprotsessa and AE do not survive rossobschestvennostyu - perceived wildness. Because there was no art , so no shows, addiction, digestion and more. AAE - is not just anoint something strange , it is a culture color to a new level , this art strokes that we do virtually nonexistent, because photos from magazines and the internet is not visible, and the construction of the composition is the same as the ability to breathe , EM naturally, in the blood.

[uriart]

Rtko - painter, not an artist in the sense of the word.
He would paint the walls of their lanes , then all amazing!
What would have cost money mansions with his paintings, and it is difficult to imagine .
Much higher than the yield for its mazaninu .
What's the point ?
What is perception?
What power ?
Ponapridumyvali what the hell ! And Salvage cut lemons for his " masterpiece ."

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от uriart

Rothko - Painter

He himself so called himself, by the way.

[Pecheneg]

Сообщение от uriart

painter, not an artist in the sense of the word.

Oil oily ...
malaria and translated from Ukrainian as an artist ...

[Игорь Гурьев]

Сообщение от Seriy

from 1920 Russia dropped out of the total hudprotsessa

You are right.

Do you know why she fell?


Just for the lack thereof.

[NATA NOVA]

Сообщение от Igor Guryev , 2297451"

Simply failing this

not for " lack " and for the "impossible" (you know , perhaps, why the recall - " camouflage realism ")
This phase is ignored (and may seichas ignored, I do not know ) at all stages of learning the fine arts of Wu ( see " History of Teaching Fine Arts " in the global- historical section)
Well, no Russian or public tolerance ( historically ) nor steremleniya understand, or mentally , or aesthetically public is not willing to even look (yeah, " ktobinovatichtodelat ")