Plein Air to abstract

[Вивьен]

It's a bit off my topic, I'm no expert in this area, but will try to answer as I can.

Сообщение от GalARTA

Dear colleagues and friends! By my calculations, those who really are interested in this subject was typed 32 people! I am a newbie on the forum and do not know - a lot or a little. But the statistics - this is quite enough))). I suggest you identify patterns relating to:
1. - "This painting" Sokolowski
2. - "Abstract art" - Peter Lebedinets post 72
3. - To name the top 5 paintings plein air. Alla Alekseeva Kiev-Sevastopol, post 73, photo 2., Kulish post 89. Sokolovskii
4. - Called the best author for visitors. will not answer.
5. - Indicate the number of abstracts that best demonstrates this notion. Novikov, soobschenie150.

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от GalARTA; 1526871"

I suggest you identify patterns relating to:
1. - "This painting"
2. - "Abstract art"
3. - To name the top 5 paintings plein air.
4. - Called the best author for visitors.
5. - Indicate the number of abstracts that best demonstrates this concept.

I am now hard to somehow select the points of one thing.
I will call this:
author of the best plein air - Victor Schupak, though;
author of the best abstrogiruyuschego series (as an example of an embodiment of the idea of plein-air) - E. Vilchukova.
Best (-ies) of the call will not undertake it, sorry.
 

[artcol]

Сообщение от iside

Fed, OK, good joke, the girl somehow saw an exhibition that here we have recently held in a furniture showroom and just decided to make a similar

I had a friend, he always jumps off the heroin and in those moments was trying to fill the void (who in the course - he knows) some crazy projects. He was a doctor by training. Here he came to me one day and said something like this:
"I have this idea that you're in the subject - must evaluate, will go or not. The idea is simple: take 2 glasses of honey they fill a clear nutrient solution and planted there the colony of special bacteria. They multiply in solution and in the process of life brighten all the colors of the rainbow. For a time the colony lives and the picture is changing, then the entire solution is eaten - can be thrown away. "
Well I have difficult than a surprise, I said - it will go ahead, I will take part. He ran away joyful. Your pictures reminded of something his

[artcol]

Add 10 more pictures.

Authors Pashkin, Arzhanov, Avramenko, Chudinov, Danilov, Uchaev, Lavrentiev Sokolov, ETC

[iside]

Сообщение от artcol

I had a friend, he always jumps off the heroin and in those moments was trying to fill the void (who in the course - he knows) some crazy projects ..... He ran away joyful. Your pictures reminded of something his

What great memories! Uh ... ought to laugh?

Dear GalaArta, a task for me to totally unbearable, but out of respect for you, I strained my eyes and brains to bursting. With your permission, not an example of the role of a connoisseur, I'll just list the artists whose paintings I would have considered as an option purchase for yourself. "The only thing that confuses me is their size, although it is still a plein-air, but definitely in the B for format picture lshem would produce an even more impressive.

Vladimir Boychenko, Yuri Manko, Edward Kulish, E. Vilchukova.

[GalARTA]

Сообщение от iside

not an example of the role of a connoisseur, I'll just list the artists whose paintings I would have considered as an option purchase for yourself.

Thank you, Isis. This criterion in the evaluation of the works - one of the most enjoyable for the gallery owner - because that does not like, never hang in your home. I think that our genius, too, was inspired by such praise!

[artcol]

Сообщение от iside

What great memories! Uh ... ought to laugh?

What's so funny?
Me as a man tormented Narzanov abstraction Novikov liked. All 5 work. Pros. Buy mb and not bought, but would hang on the wall. First, for a month. Then mb left, but first a month

[Seriy]

I join the opinion of Mr. Syzran, these authors I have mentioned.

[Тютчев]

Сообщение от GalARTA

quote two authoritative source on this.
NB Avtonomova - leading researcher of the Museum of Private Collections in Moscow: "The thought of how to get rid of objectivity, has long worried about Kandinsky. He went to THIS KNOWINGLY, persistently step by step. .. But preodalet a familiar artistic consciousness was easy. It took years of study, improving skills, learning theory. Now he aims to "spiritual eye to penetrate into the depths of the universe" and hear her secret great music.
   Rejecting the subject image, Kandinsky develops three types of abstract paintings, which formed the basis of his work. The first - is the "impression of" being born from direct experiences "outside of nature", then - "Improvisation", expressing , mostly unconsciously, most of the sudden the "processes of an internal nature, that is the impression of inner nature. Finally, the "composition". It is in their perennial quest Kandinsky get the most complete embodiment of ...
"Composition" has a beautifully-plastic drammaturgiyu. Work on them was slow and hard. Kandinsky conceived their "composition" as some new worlds emerging as arose space - by disasters, like the chaotic roar of the orchestra, eventually spilling into a symphony, whose name is music of the spheres ... the artist creates a new reality, only perceived emotional -sensual, but it will feel the entire complex, full of great upheaval spiritual world the beginning of XX century. "

Present your quote Avtonomova says only that its author is not accurate in their statements, talking about the work of Kandinsky. The inaccuracy lies in the fact that all the work that Wassily Kandinsky called "impressions," Improvisation "and" composition ", it calls the abstract. In fact, many of them the artist retains links with the real objects. And that means they can not be called an abstract in the full sense of the word. In his article "On Kandinsky Dmitry Sarabyanov uses in relation to such works by Kandinsky, the term" semi-abstract ", citing as examples the work of the Lake" (1910).
 
On its way to irrelevance Wassily Kandinsky created a lot of figurative and semi-abstract works, but they can not be called a pure abstraction. These were the approaches to abstraction. The same "approaches" can be detected and Piet Mondrian. He is just doing something similar to what you call a "series of abstracts" in the manner of a "high Cubism" (1912). Unlike Picasso and Braque, he did not set out the tasks Cubism images of an object or natural motifs from all possible viewpoints, using the techniques of rotational view. It eliminates from the composition not only color, which he reduced to black and gray-blue palette, but also the mass, the objectivity which he designated expressive geometric lines, revealing the inner skeleton of architectural and natural motifs. But he went on to Picasso and Braque, and later completely abandoning figurative. After a period of "high-Cubist" followed by a period, relatively speaking, "poluabstraktsii" (1914). In a large oval compositions of ink and charcoal, he likened the facades of churches and marine species geometric structures of the vertical lines. (Your "abstractive series is closer to Mondrian just these periods of" high Cubism "and follows it, than to Kandinsky and his" impressions, "Improvisation" and "composition").

And Kandinsky, and Mondrian discovered for themselves pure abstraction by a complex creative evolution.


The work of Piet Mondrian dokubisticheskogo and Cubist periods:

[Тютчев]

Cubist works of Piet Mondrian and the "semi-abstract" periods: