Yablonskaya Tetyana

[Самвел]

I have one job, s /m was a semi-circle, but there were big losses, 80%is Yablonskaya, look. Maybe this is your probabushka.

[Buscador]

Сообщение от Vivien

the bad quality of moldings, which were decorated work (before the show) Gallery "Charm", catalog, buffet and other amenities the authors calculated in advance for his work at the price set "Charm", the amount of know I will not name - is unethical.

Where did you all know Vivien? Me. For example, we know that in Kiev there are still some 600 directories A. Gavdzinskogo. For them also to calculate? Why not pick up? And for the buffet? He apparently with VIP-guests, too, had cost a pretty penny. A television and the press? As far as I know, there was a channel 4. In general, there arithmetic known.
Can you say that in 2008, the "Charm" was to be held another exhibition of famous painter, whose interests I represent, with the release of the catalog, etc. So to us after the story was denied.

[Вивьен]

Сообщение от Buscador

Where did you all know Vivien? Me. For example, we know that in Kiev there are still some 600 directories A. Gavdzinskogo. For them also to calculate? Why not pick up? And for the buffet? He apparently with VIP-guests, too, had cost a pretty penny. A television and the press? As far as I know, there was a channel 4. In general, there arithmetic known.
Can you say that in 2008, the "Charm" was to be held another exhibition of famous painter, whose interests I represent, with the release of the catalog, etc. So to us after the story was denied.

I know, because personally saw that the work brought back from the exhibition of the Kiev restructure into other frames, as some simply collapsed. I have 2 work with the exhibition of the Kiev, in the same baguette. Catalogs generally something going on sale. And that they can pick up? Write at what price. And why you were denied in an exhibition? What motivated? Only this story?

[Семен Семенович]

Dear Buscador! Big request to you is no longer discuss this subject. It does not apply to, and the cause of failure in the exhibition to explain. Thanks

[color="# 666686"]Added after 3 minutes[/color]

Сообщение от Vivien

I know, because personally saw that the work brought back from the exhibition of the Kiev restructure into other frames, as some simply collapsed. I have 2 work with the exhibition of the Kiev, in the same baguette. Catalogs generally something going on sale. And that they can pick up? Write at what price. And why you were denied in an exhibition? What motivated? Only this story?

Сообщение от Vivien

And why you were denied in an exhibition? What motivated? Only this story?

Dear Vivian! And why do you? This is another story and the other principals!

[Вивьен]

Semen Semenovich, my message is addressed Buscador, so happened until I wrote it, you got me beat. Perhaps it will be interesting to you too. I have a suggestion to stop discussing this event, because the topic about the gallery "Charm" opened not me. And my argument in defense of one hand, clearly will be regarded as the prosecution another. Vuscador, not us with you to understand this misunderstanding. And so it is clear that each of the parties to defend their interests. Being on this forum, I do not purport to deal with any reputation Gallery "Charm", or any other picture, I do not for that reason. But when individual users are raising this question (referring to Theophanes Mukhin - on the idea, I had to ignore his questions, but it would imply my agreement with his charges), and even in the context of the scandal, of course, I express my opinion on this bill. I propose to close this topic on a positive note, and agree on the fact that the gallery with the artist emerged misunderstanding rather than conflict. Neither I nor you are unable to document all of the above (as to who for what was calculated and how it was, as will submit to a public display information from someone else's words). Clearly, buffet and organized a press gallery. And you can confirm the documents that these costs were not included in that amount deducted from the artist in the account referred to them works in the gallery that this amount covers only on the design of pictures and parts catalogs, which gave the artist after the exhibition (the other remained in Kiev on sale)? So I can not document the opposite. I believe that everyone on the site of the gallery would have done the same. If you have solid buyers, why not persuade the artist after the exhibition opened to sell those works which were not originally intended for sale? That's life, it's business. But in place of the artist, each would have done the same for themselves. Some of the work he had already handed in the netting and the reason he had to leave with the best work that was prepared for an exhibition in Odessa, moreover, that an oral agreement was that the exhibition would not be commercial in nature? I know Gavdzinskogo as a man, he would rather overpay, than "not dodast. Only a conscience was clear. One can only conclude that, to avoid misunderstanding by the beginning of an event (where there is commercial interest), it is advisable to confirm the further cooperation in writing not to go after the talk, who spent and who is not, agree on something either "up" or "after". Again, I have no personal or commercial interest respond negatively about the gallery, I just answered the questions put to me by the user (Theophanes Mukhin).

[Семен Семенович]

Dear Vivian! As you probably guessed, I have some relation to the gallery "Charm". And why would not like to read the idle talk about what happened, what did not happen. Albin S. knows all (and only one) and an opinion expressed to me personally for two more years nazad.Esche just wanted to say that he does not deserve to have his name rinsed all and sundry. This is a good and sincere man and blame him proishedshem no no. What happened was something that happened. This topic is closed and would not want to raise it again. Best regards

[Вивьен]

Сообщение от Semen Semenovich

This topic is closed and would not want to raise it again. Regards

Very pleased that we agreed on this issue.

[Tana]

Finally, too, am glad that everything ended well and an excellent example for all of us in the future:
not assign or to spread gossip, do not shake the air and beat the check information, then to not be ashamed and "excruciatingly painful" to those people who offend those rumors!!

[woook]

Сообщение от Altim

Each of them were sons - the good themselves artists

Glushchenko Jr., significantly different from his father, the similarities only superficial and conventional, I know what I'm talking ... held in the hands of the father and son and even saw
forgery Glushchenko-father in one of the famous galleries of Kiev, where she stood out for the original ...

[vyadem]

woook, and I know that sometimes Nikolai Glushchenko seeing his son for work so keen advice and help that he was finishing, or brought into the picture a lot