Pyotr Konchalovsky

[NATA NOVA]

Unusually nteresnaya work. It's very interesting to know he history of the establishment

[Евгений]

Сообщение от Eriksson

Eugene, is all that is on the show? A total of 19 work?

Read carefully:

Сообщение от Eugene

The exhibition presents about 120 paintings and drawings from the collections of museums, organizers and private collections.

[Евгений]

A small photo essay about the exhibition of the remarkable Russian artist, PP Konchalovsky ...
The exhibition is timed to the Year of Russia, France, 2010. 20 graphic works [/QUOTE]

[Евгений]

The State Museum of Fine Arts The Pushkin exhibition of Armenian and Russian paintings stored in the museums of Yerevan. Linens lend the National Gallery of Armenia, house museums Saryan and Yervant Kochar and Museum of Russian Art in Yerevan. Exhibition "Two colors of the rainbow - two destinies reflection ..." will run until November 14.
1.Rabota from the show. Petr Konchalovsky. Still Life with Fruit. 1912.

[Peter]

Finally vybralsya.Vystavka interesting and largely pouchitelnaya.Organizatsiya, design and hanging at the top urovne.Katalog great, even kupil.Tak as the works of the great creative period, it was interesting to not only see but also to think about life and creativity. I want to say this is my personal reasoning and someone can not share them, but ... the interesnee.Konchalovsky except that he is big and the artist's studio (it's already been proven history) apparently was a man of romantic and enthusiastic, if not gambling . Having trained in classical academy he uvmdel that there's a new art, and other ill im.Igra in this new painting fascinated him so much that learning new techniques, he threw himself into dogonku their new idols, but was unable to approach their level isplneniya.Raboty 1907 in impressionism, where a lot of white, but there is no light (it is the fact that impressinizm and writing), then the passion Van Gogh, but without vangogovskogo "sedtsa narazryv. of producing a purely formal experience, then Sezann.Ochen rough Cezanne especially without such fine modelirovok color, for that Cezanne valued as zhivopistsa.Gogenovskie still lifes moving smoothly in portraits Fauves, and those in cubism Pikasso.Nachinaesh think, and where you Pyotr Petrovich as an artist, where your perception of himself by himself, without these multilayer "filters". Or Your consciousness is subdued expression (vision) of the stronger personalities tvorchiskih? One artist told me (which is also very much squinting under a certain manner): "And what if we're painting like-minded?" No brother, "I said to him, associates are over a glass of tea, or say on football when the cheer for nashih.A here painting personal, individual substance, it is the handwriting of the soul! "But I did otvleksya.Vse Konchalovsky manifested itself in my opinion in the later works, when settled, and the revolutionary passions of adolescence" do it "Then more apparent and the harmonious combination of colors, light appeared and skill kompozitsii.K example in the landscape of the thirties, and especially the work of the" polisher "1946 goda.Eto hot on the trail ..

[fabosch]

It so happened that looked Konchalovsky and host in St. Petersburg (RM) and the Tretyakov Gallery. The exhibition in the Russian liked more, because it clearly identified the fact that I do not like to Konchalovsky - obduracy, academic, artistic complacency since the second half of 1920. A sort of Stalinist empire in his left recension. In Russkoi museum exhibit was constructed by the linear principle - a suite of rooms in Moscow is flowing spaces Corps of Engineers is impressed eroded somewhat visually stirring works of different years.
Just the work of 1910 (especially the Sienese), like, some very much so. I do not agree with the assertion that his first bubnovovaletovsky period is not independent, well or, well, he had himself no less than his entire poslebubnovskaya painting, but for me personally so much more. In these studies, it has its own face, which I do not see even in the later. In my opinion it blows from the chill. Probably with me, many will disagree, but for me it was so long ago, and I have not changed their opinion after reading this exhibition.

[Peter]

Always interested in another look, so I will say that just Sienese period I have not liked more vsego.Hudozhnik (in my opinion) writes so simply, that the word "color" the most umestno.Kompozitsii any flat in the forehead, those green coated with windows (why?), briefly jarring close to primitivism (not to a special kind of painting), all blunt-sadly, there is no light voobsche.A because it is sunny Italy in the end. . Stalin's empire, I have not seen, although there were more traditional work, but they (here agree with you) do not have to podarok.Tschatelnee, guys!

[fabosch]

Сообщение от Peter

all dumb-dull, no light voobsche.A because it is sunny Italy in the end. .

Well, you see, it is not necessary to write to Italy as Sylvester Shchedrin. Maybe such a view. Moreover, I think he grabbed some inner essence of Siena, that although the Italian, but the medieval city par excellence, he showed her harshness, its specificity as a center of Sienese school of painting.
And no matter how look, its the Siena painting does not recognize the dismal - in my opinion, it is overflowing with energy.

[Peter]

fabosch, in terms of vitality here probably agree (and you have a pleasant conversation ) Yes, the harshness of the land, the inner core, could well byt.Vidite I not a fan Silvestra.Dazhe admit that the artist captured it so that everyone else (as I said), he felt worthless.

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от Peter

But it's sunny Italy in the end.

Now here I just read a letter from Mashkov Konchalovsky in 1925 from Italy and from France.